Skip to main content

Rudists

  • Reference work entry
Paleontology

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Earth Science ((EESS))

The evolution of modern types of coral reefs started early in the Mesozoic Era, when the rootstocks of living hermatypic corals, hydrozoans, crustose algae, sponges, and other reef-forming organisms first appeared. During the Triassic and Jurassic Periods, 136–225 m yr ago, these reef-associated organisms evolved rapidly; radiated into most of the major ecological niches that they occupy today; and, by the end of the Triassic, combined to form extensive “barrier” reefs (aligned bioherms), isolated bioherms, and patch reefs of modern proportions. These were reefs of great ecological complexity, composed of diverse organisms and zoned into distinct communities. In all probability, the complex symbiotic relationships between hermatypic corals (especially Thamnasteroids, Microsalenids, Latomeandroids, Synastreids, and Amphastreids) and intracellular zooxanthellae had formed by Jurassic time. All evidence indicates that reef communities dominated by hermatypic corals, hydrozoans, and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 519.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bein, A., 1976. Rudistid fringing reefs of Cretaceous shallow carbonate platform of Israel, Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 60, 258–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, A. G., 1977. Jamaican coral-rudist frameworks and their geologic setting, Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Stud. Geol., 4, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coogan, A. H., 1977. Early and middle Cretaceous Hippuritacea (rudists) of the Gulf Coast, Bur. Econ. Geol., Univ. Texas, Rept. Inv., 89, 32–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechaseaux, C., 1952. Classe de Lamellibranches, in J. Piveteau, ed., Traité de Paleontologie, T. II. Paris: Masson et Cie, 220–364. (Rudistae, 323–364)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechaseaux, C., 1969. Origin and extinction, in Moore, 1969, N765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvillé, H., 1935. Les Rudistes et leur évolution, Bull. Soc. Géol. France, Sér. 5, 5, 319–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. G., 1964. The Lofer cyclothems of the Alpine Triassic, Geol. Surv. Kansas Bull., 169(1), 107–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, E. G., 1974. Cretaceous assemblages, communities, and associations: Western Interior United States and Caribbean Islands, in A. M. Ziegler et al., Principles of Benthic Community Analysis (notes for a short course). Sedimenta IV, Comp. Sed. Lab., Div. Mar. Geol. Geophys., Rosensteil Sch. Mar. Atmos. Sci., Univ. Miami, 12.1–12.27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, E. G., and Sohl. N. F., 1974. Structure and evolution of Antillean Cretaceous rudist frameworks, Verhandl. Naturf. Ges. Basel, 84, 399–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinghardt, F., 1931. Die Rudisten, Teil III. Biologie und Beobachtungen an anderen Muschelen. Berlin: privately printed, 60p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanović, B., 1933. Les problèmes paléobiologiques et bio-stratigraphiques des Rudistes, Mém. Serv. Géol. Yugoslavie, 194p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C., ed., 1969. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, pt. N. Mollusca 6, Bivalvia vol. 2. Lawrence, Kansas: Geol. Soc. Amer. and Univ. Kansas Press, N751–N765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, B. F., 1969. Rudist morphology, in Moore, 1969, N751–N764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, B. F., 1974. Paleoecology of a rudist reef complex in the Comanche. Cretaceous, Glenrose Limestone of central Texas, Geoscience and Man, 8, 131–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, J., 1972. Paléoécologie des formations à rudistes du Crétacé supérieur: L'exemple du sudest de la France, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 12, 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, P. W., 1976. Functional morphology of the Hippuritidae. Lethaia, 9, 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, P. W., 1978. The evolution of functional design in rudists (Hippuritacea) and its taxonomic implications, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B., 284, 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toucas, A., 1903-1904. Etudes sur la classification et Pévolution des Hippurites, Soc. Géol. France, Paléont. Mém., 30, 128p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonge, C. M., 1967. Form, habit, and evolution in the Chamidae (Bivalvia) with reference to conditions in the rudists (Hippuritacea), Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, 252, 49–105.

    Google Scholar 

Cross-references

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kauffman, E.G., Sohl, N.F. (1979). Rudists . In: Paleontology. Encyclopedia of Earth Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31078-9_123

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31078-9_123

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-87933-185-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31078-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics