Skip to main content

A Method of Airborne Gravimetry by Combining Strapdown Inertial and New Satellite Observations via Dynamic Networks

  • Conference paper
Book cover International Symposium on Earth and Environmental Sciences for Future Generations

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 147))

  • 888 Accesses

Abstract

We revisit the concept of scalar gravity anomaly determination by an airborne strapdown INS–GNSS system. We built on the previously investigated concepts (mainly within 1995–2005 period) while trying to decrease the error spectrum of the system caused by accelerometer biases at lower frequencies and GNSS-position/velocity noise at shorter wavelengths. We propose to determine the random long-term accelerometer bias through combination of −GRACE + GOCE data that provide an unbiased field with 80 km resolution while the decrease in velocity noise is expected by precise-point-positioning (PPP) method that merges satellite-phase observations from GPS and Galileo. In the absence of Galileo constellation we focus our practical demonstration on the gravity-anomaly determination via INS/GNSS data filtering. We present first the modeling of an extended Kalman filter/smoother that determines the gravity anomaly together with the trajectory, which is a preferred method over the cascade determination (i.e. separate estimation of trajectory and specific forces, GNSS acceleration and low-pass filtering of the merged signal). Second, we show how to incorporate the same modeling within the concept of dynamic networks. This approach allows imposing cross-over conditions on the state of gravity anomaly at trajectory intersections while estimating the sensor and trajectory errors at the same time. This is indeed rigorous formulation of the problem that is expected to surpass the conditioning via cross-over adjustment that in previous investigations followed the filtering-smoothing. Despite the remaining challenges of the method of dynamic network caused by large number of parameters (i.e. > 106), we present first assessment of such implementation that was obtained within European FP7 GAL project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bastos L, Tome P, Cunha T, Cunha S (2000) Gravity anomalies from airborne measurements - experiments using a low cost IMU device. In: The International Association of Geodesy Symposia Serie, Banff, vol 123

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Niebauer TM, Klopping FJ (2002) Towards a dynamic absolute gravity system. In: Sideris M (ed) International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 123. Springer, New York, pp 223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Brozena J, Peters M, Salman R (1996) Arctic airborne gravity measurement program. In: IAG symposia GRAGEOMAR, gravity, geoid and marine geodesy, vol 117, pp 131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton A, Glennie C, Schwarz K (1999) Differentiation for high precision GPS velocity and acceleration determination. GPS Solutions 2(4):7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomina I, Blazquez M (2004) A unified approach to static and dynamic modeling in photogrammetry and remote sensing. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sensing Spat Inf Sci 35-B1:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez J, Fernández A, D’Angelo P, Caramagno A (2006) GRANADA: a low-cost commercial simulator for GNSS receivers design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the NAVITEC 2006, Noordjwik, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson S, Hammada Y (2002) Experiences with AIRGrav: results from a new airborne gravimeter. In: Sideris M (ed) International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 123. Springer, New York, pp 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R, Olesen A, Keller K (2002) Airborne gravity survey of the north greenland continental shelf. In: Sideris M (ed) International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 123. Springer, New York, pp 225–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Friess P (1990) Kinematische positionsbestimmung fur die aerotriangulation mit dem navstar global positioning system. Ph.D. thesis, TU Munchen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima T (2012) Numerical computation of spherical harmonics of arbitrary degree and order by extending exponent of floating point numbers. J Geod 86:271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb A (1988) Applied optimal estimation. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach C, Dorobantu R, Ackermann C, Kjorsvik NS, Boedecker G (2010) Preliminary results of a GPS/INS airborne gravimetry experiment over the german alps. In: Mertikas SP (ed) International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 135. Springer, New York, pp 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilardoni M, Reguzzoni M, Sampietro D (2013) A least-squares collocation procedure to merge local geoids with the aid of satellite-only gravity models: the Italian/Swiss geoids case study. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 54(4):303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilardoni M, Reguzzoni M, Sampietro D (2014) Using GOCE to straighten and sew European local geoids: preliminary study and first results. In: Marti U (ed) Gravity, geoid and height systems. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 141. Springer, New York, pp 229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilardoni M, Reguzzoni M, Sampietro D (2016) GECO: a global gravity model by locally combining GOCE data and EGM2008. Stud Geophys Geod 60:228–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennie C (1999) Analysis of airborne gravity by SINS/DGPS. INS, gravity, University of Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennie C, Schwarz K (1999) A comparison and analysis of airborne gravimetry results from two strapdown inertial/DGPS systems. J Geod 73(6):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency (2011) GAL: Galileo for gravity. GSA research project FP7-287193

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P, Johnson AC (1995) Airborne gravity survey in southern palmer land, antartica. In: IAG symposia G4, IUGG XXI general assembly, Boulder, pp 117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingele E, Cocard M, Kahle H, Halliday M (1997) Kinematic GPS as a source for airborne gravity reduction: the airborne gravity survey of Switzerland. J Geophys Res 102(B4):7705–7715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X (2011) Strapdown INS/DGPS airborne gravimetry tests in the Gulf of Mexico. J Geod 85:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Schwarz K, Wei M (1994) The spectral window for airborne gravity and geoid determination. In: International symposium on kinematic systems in geodesy, geomatics and navigation (KIS 1994), pp 445–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Migliaccio F, Reguzzoni M, Sanso F, Tselfes N (2009) An error model for the GOCE space-wise solution by Monte Carlo methods. In: Sideris M (ed) International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 133. Springer, New York, pp 337–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Parés M, Navarro J, Colomina I (2015) On the generation of realistic simulated inertial measurements. In: Proceedings of the DGON 2015 inertial sensors and systems (ISS), Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Reguzzoni M, Tselfes N (2009) Optimal multi-step collocation: application to the space-wise approach for GOCE data analysis. J Geod 83(1):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouzaud D, Skaloud J (2011) Rigorous integration of inertial navigation with optical sensors by dynamic networks. J Inst Navig 58(2):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampietro D, Mansi AH, Amodio A, Sanso F (2015) Gravity anomalies and geoid undulation from strapdown airborne gravimetry: outcomes from the gal project. In: IAG symposia G2, IUGG general assembly 26, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampietro D, Capponi M, Triglione D, Mansi A, Marchetti P, Sansò F (2016) GTE: a new software for gravitational terrain effect computation: theory and performances. Pure Appl Geophys 1–19. doi:10.1007/s00024-016-1265-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarjakoski T (1984) On sparse matrix techniques for computing weight coefficient matrices. ISPRS Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens XXV-A3:932–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz K (1987) Approaches to kinematic geodesy. In: Geodetic theory and methodology. Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz K, Li Y (1995) What can airborne gravimetry contribute to geoid determination? In: IAG Symposia G4, IUGG XXI general assembly, Boulder, pp 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeber G (1993) Satellite geodesy. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Termens A, Colomina I (2006) Network approach versus state-space approach for strapdown inertial kinematic gravimetry. In: International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 131. Springer, New York, pp 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmen L, Bastos L, Forsberg R, Gidskehaug A, Meyer U (1999) Airborne gravity surveying for oceanography, geology and geodesy - the experiences from AGMASCO. In: IAG General Assembly, Birmingham. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 121, pp 118–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tome P (2002) Integration of inertial and satellite navigation systems for aircraft attitude determination. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Schwarz K (1994) An error analysis of airborne vector gravimetry. In: International symposium on kinematic systems in geodesy, geomatics and navigation (KIS 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Schwarz K (1998) Flight test results from a strapdown airborne gravity system. J Geod 72:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this article was conducted within the “Galileo for Gravity” (GAL) project funded by the European Commission (grant 287193), within the 7th European Programme for Research and Development (FP7), and managed by the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency (GSA). GAL was realized by a consortium lead by the Italian company Galileian Plus.

The contribution of GeoNumerics to this article was partially funded by the Spanish project DINA (Ref. SPTQ120-1X005688XV0, Progama Torres y Quevedo, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad,Spain).

The first author thanks to Dr. Alex Bruton for providing a data set and programs for the purpose of comparison.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Skaloud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skaloud, J., Colomina, I., Parés, M.E., Blázquez, M., Silva, J., Chersich, M. (2016). A Method of Airborne Gravimetry by Combining Strapdown Inertial and New Satellite Observations via Dynamic Networks. In: Freymueller, J.T., Sánchez, L. (eds) International Symposium on Earth and Environmental Sciences for Future Generations. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 147. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2016_229

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics