Abstract
The official GFZ RL05 monthly GRACE gravity models were processed in a two-step approach. In the first step the orbits were determined. In the second step corrections to the gravity field parameters were estimated, while the orbits were kept fixed. This led to a significant de-noising of the resulting monthly models, but accidentally also to a regularization, i.e., the estimated gravity field coefficients were biased towards the a priori model. We compare the GFZ RL05 models to a revised version RL05a that was determined in a common estimation of orbit and force model parameters. A large number of gravity field coefficients is significantly affected. We relate this effect to the one-hourly stochastic accelerations estimated for orbit determination, and to ignoring the correlations.
In the main part of this paper we study the interaction between pseudo-stochastic orbit parameters and gravity field coefficients. To explain this interaction we make use of a time-wise approach to gravity field determination. We apply the linear perturbation theory developed by Hill for circular orbits to compute lumped coefficients of the inter-satellite range-rate observations. We illustrate that the pseudo-stochastic orbit parameters act as a high-pass filter on the lumped coefficients spectra of the range-rates. Because the lumped coefficients are related to the spherical harmonics coefficients via a summation over all degrees, the whole range of gravity field coefficients is affected.
This result is of relevance for all approaches to gravity field estimation from orbit observations, where dynamic orbits are introduced a priori and the arc-specific parameters are kept fixed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Not to be confused with the lumped coefficients introduced by Gooding (1971) for resonant analyses.
References
Beutler G, Jäggi A, Mervart L, Meyer U (2010a) The celestial mechanics approach: theoretical foundations. J Geodesy 84:605–624. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0401-7
Beutler G, Jäggi A, Mervart L, Meyer U (2010b) The celestial mechanics approach: application to data of the GRACE mission. J Geodesy 84:661–681. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0402-6
Dahle C, Flechtner F, Gruber C, König D, König R, Michalak G, Neumayer KH (2012) GFZ GRACE level-2 processing standards document for level-2 product release 0005. Scientific Technical Report STR12/02. doi:10.2312/GFZ.b103-1202-25
Flechtner F, Dahle C, Gruber C, Sasgen I, König R, Michalak G, Neumayer KH (2013) Status GFZ RL05 and RL05a GRACE L2 products. In: Proceedings of the GRACE science team meeting 2013, Austin, Texas, 23–25 Oct 2013. Available at http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace/GSTM/
Gooding RH (1971) Lumped fifteenth-order harmonics in the geopotential. Nat Phys Sci 231:168–169. doi:10.1038/physci231168a0
Hill GW (1878) Researches in the lunar theory. Am J Math I:5–26, 129–147, 245–260
Kaula WM (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, pp 30–37
Luthcke SB, Rowlands DD, Lemoine FG, Klosko SM, Chinn D, McCarthy JJ (2006) Monthly spherical harmonic gravity field solutions determined from GRACE inter-satellite range-rate data alone. Geophys Res Lett 33:L02402. doi:10.1029/2005GL024846
Meyer U, Jäggi A, Beutler G, Bock H (2013) The role of a priori information in gravity field determination. Geophysical Research Abstracts 15, EGU2013-9008. Presentation available at http://www.bernese.unibe.ch/publist/2013/pres/EGU2013_UM.pdf
Sneeuw N (1992) Representation coefficients and their use in satellite geodesy. Manuscr Geodaet 17:117–123
Sneeuw N (2000) A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C 527:22–34
Visser PNAM (2005) Low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking: a comparison between analytical linear orbit perturbation theory and numerical integration. J Geodesy 79:160–166. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0455-0
Wagner CA (1983) Direct determination of gravitational harmonics from low-low GRAVSAT data. J Geophys Res 88:10309–10321. doi:10.1029/JB088iB12p10309
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank P. Visser and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which helped to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Meyer, U., Dahle, C., Sneeuw, N., Jäggi, A., Beutler, G., Bock, H. (2015). The Effect of Pseudo-Stochastic Orbit Parameters on GRACE Monthly Gravity Fields: Insights from Lumped Coefficients. In: Sneeuw, N., Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sansò, F. (eds) VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 142. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_67
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_67
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24548-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30530-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)