Skip to main content

A STIT-Extension of ATL

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4160))

Abstract

A problem in many formalisms for reasoning about multi-agent systems, like ATL or PDL, is the inability to express that a certain complex action (as in PDL), choice or strategy (as in ATL) is performed by an agent. However, in so called STIT-logics, this is exactly the main operator: seeing to it that a certain condition is achieved. Here we present an extension of ATL, introducing ideas from STIT-theory, that can express that a group of agents A perform a certain strategy. As a demonstration of the applicability of the formalism, we show how it sheds new light on the problem of modelling ‘uniform strategies’ in epistemic versions of ATL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Henzinger, T., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 1997), pp. 100–109. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Henzinger, T., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 49(5), 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Belnap, N., Perloff, M.: Seeing to it that: A canonical form for agentives. Theoria 54, 175–199 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap, N., Perloff, M.: Seeing to it that: A canonical form for agentives. In: Kyburg, H.E., Loui, R.P., Carlson, G.N. (eds.) Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning, pp. 167–190. Kluwer, Boston (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., Xu, M.: Facing the future: agents and choices in our indeterminist world. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horty, J.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: Knowing How to Play: Uniform Choices in Logics of Agency. In: Weiss, G., Stone, P. (eds.) 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS 2006), Hakodate, Japan, pp. 209–216. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Müller, T.: On the formal structure of continuous action. In: Schmidt, R., Pratt-Hartmann, I., Reynolds, M., Wansing, H. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 5, pp. 191–209. King’s College Publications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jamroga, W., Ågotnes, T.: Constructive knowledge: what agents can achieve under incomplete information. Technical Report IfI-05-10, Institute of Computer Science, Clausthal University of Technology, Clausthal-Zellerfeld (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Broersen, J., Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: From coalition logic to stit. In: Proceedings LCMAS 2005. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goranko, V., Jamroga, W.: Comparing semantics of logics for multi-agent systems. Synthese 139(2), 241–280 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Pauly, M.: A modal logic for coalitional power in games. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(1), 149–166 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Jamroga, W., Hoek, W.v.d.: Agents that know how to play. Fundamenta Informaticae 63(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoek, W.v.d., Wooldridge, M.: Cooperation, knowledge, and time: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Studia Logica 75(1), 125–157 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Neumann, J.v., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chisholm, R.: Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis 24, 33–36 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wansing, H.: Obligations, authorities, and history dependence. In: Wansing, H. (ed.) Essays on Non-classical Logic, pp. 247–258. World Scientific, Singapore (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Broersen, J., Herzig, A., Troquard, N. (2006). A STIT-Extension of ATL. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4160. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-39625-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39627-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics