Skip to main content

Creating Better Abstract Operators

  • Conference paper
Abstraction, Reformulation and Approximation (SARA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3607))

Abstract

Using abstract operators for least commitment in planning has been shown to potentially reduce the search space by an exponential factor. However a naive application of these operators can result in an unbounded growth in search space for the worst case. In this paper we investigate another important aspect of abstract operators – that of their construction. Similar to their application, naive construction of an abstract operator may leave you with little search space reduction even in the best case, and significant penalties in the worst. We explain what it means to be a good abstract operator and describe a method of creating good abstract operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman, M., Weld, D.: Least-commitment action selection. In: AIPS Proc. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teutenberg, J., Barley, M.: Abstract operators: A rather technical report (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joslin, D.: Passive and Active Decision Postponement in Plan Generation. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knoblock, C.: Automatically generating abstractions for problem solving. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fink, E.: Automatic representation changes in problem solving. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sacerdoti, E.: Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces. Artificial Intelligence 5, 115–135 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Tate, A.: Generating project networks. In: IJCAI Proc., pp. 888–893 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nau, D., Au, T., Ilghami, O., Kuter, U., Murdock, W., Wu, D., Yaman, F.: Shop2: An htn planning system. Journal of Artifical Intelligence Research 20, 379–404 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Weld, D.: An introduction to least commitment planning. AI Magazine 15, 27–61 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winograd, T.: Understanding Natural Language. Academic Press, London (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson, J.A.: A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 12, 23–41 (1965)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Teutenberg, J., Barley, M. (2005). Creating Better Abstract Operators. In: Zucker, JD., Saitta, L. (eds) Abstraction, Reformulation and Approximation. SARA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11527862_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11527862_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27872-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31882-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics