Skip to main content

PLM to support hazard identification in chemical plant design

  • Conference paper
Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development
  • 1684 Accesses

Abstract

A complete plant design is described through an huge amount of data organized in a big number of documents of different types logically linked each other by complex relationships; managing information about plants is a complex and expensive task. The techniques commonly adopted for hazard identification require high costs and time for their development; many specialists in different disciplines need to be involved for all the time necessary to complete the plant documentation analysis. The research project here presented is based on the idea of taking advantage of the organization of the information typically offered by Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems in order to allow designers to evaluate specific plant aspects, in particular those concerning possible hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Heikkila, A.M., 1999, Inherently Safety in Process Plant Design – An Index-based Approach, VTT Publications 384, PhD1999, ISBN 951–38-5372–1 http://www.inf.vtt.fi/pdf/publications/1999/P384.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hendershot, D.C., Post, R.L., 2000, Inherent Safety and Reliability in Plant Design. Proc. of Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center, 2000 Annual Symposium: Beyond Regulatory Compliance, Making Safety Second Nature, Texas, October 2000

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hendershot, D.C., 1995. Some Thoughts on the Difference Between Inherent Safety and Safety. Process Safety Progress 14, October 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kletz, T.A., 1992b, Inherently safer design – a review. 7th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, SRP Partners, Rome, Vol. I, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Inherent Safety Approach – http://process-safety.tamu.edu

    Google Scholar 

  6. INSIDE Project, “The INSET toolkit” http://www.aeat-safety-and-rsk,com/html/inset.html

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hendershot, D.C., 2002. A Check List for Inherently Safer Chemical Reaction Process Design Workshop on Risk and Reliability. Proc. of International Conference and Workshop on Risk and Reliability, Center for Chemical process Safety, October 2002

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kletz, T.A., 1992. HAZOP and HAZAN- Identifying and Assessing Process Industry Hazards. 3rd ed. Rugby: IChemE.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M., Ashford, N.A., Perspectives for combining cleaner production with inherently safer production in industrial firms, UNEP IE, Nov. 2001

    Google Scholar 

  10. Howat, C. S., - Process Hazard Identification Using Hazard and Operability Studies - University of Kansas, 2002,lecture notes, http://www.engr.ukans.edu/~ktl/

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, P.W.H., Yang, S., HAZARD analysis and support tool for computer controlled processes, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, November 1998

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chung, P.W.H., McCoy, S.A., 2001. Trial of the “HAZID” tool for computer-based HAZOP emulation on the medium-sized industrial plant, HAZARDS XVI, IChemE Symposium Series No. 148, Manchester, UK, 2001, pp. 391–404, ISBN 0–85295-441.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer, C., Chung, P.W.H., 1999. Verifying Signed Directed Graph Models for Process Plants, Computers and Chemical Engineering Supplement, Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Palmer, C., Chung, P.W.H., 2001. Verification of process plant models – Proceedings of the 2001 AAAI Symposium on Model-Based Validation of Intelligence, Stanford, 2001, AAAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Venkatasubramanian, J. Zhao, S. Viswanathan. Intelligent system for HAZOP analysis of complex plants. Computer and Chemical Engineering 24 (2000) pp. 2291–2302, Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ansaldi, S., Bragatto, P., Giannini, F., Ludovisi, G., Monti, M., 2003, Criteri di sicurezza intrinseca per la progettazione di impianti di processo attraverso strumenti CAD, CAE e PDM, Convegno Scientifico Nazionale “Sicurezza nei sistemi complessi”, Atti del Convegno, Bari, October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lees, F.P., 1980. Loss prevention in the Process Industries – volume 1, Butterworths

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giannini, F., Monti, M., Ansaldi, S., Bragatto, P. (2006). PLM to support hazard identification in chemical plant design. In: Brissaud, D., Tichkiewitch, S., Zwolinski, P. (eds) Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4617-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4617-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4601-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4617-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics