Skip to main content

Postpartum Tubal Ligation

  • Chapter
Obstetric Anesthesia Handbook
  • 1002 Accesses

Abstract

Many obstetricians prefer to perform postpartum tubal ligation immediately after the delivery or before the women are discharged from the hospital. This procedure has a few distinct advantages:

  1. 1.

    Immediately after delivery, the uterine fundus lies between the umbilicus and symphysis pubis, so the fallopian tubes remain easily accessible.

  2. 2.

    Uncomplicated postpartum sterilization does not increase the hospital stay.

  3. 3.

    There is less medical cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Roberts RB, Shirley MA: Reducing the risk of acid aspiration during cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:859.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blouw R, Scatliff J, Craig DB: Gastric volume and pH in postpartum patients. Anesthesiology 1976; 45:456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Uram M, Abouleish E, McKenzie R, et al: The risk of aspiration pneumonitis with postpartum tubal ligation (abstract). Presented at the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Jackson Hole, WY, 1982. p 2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James CF, Gibbs CP, Banner T: Postpartum perioperative risk of aspiration pneumonia. Anesthesiology 1984; 61:756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Datta S, Lambert DH, Gregus J, et al: Differential sensitivities of mammalian nerve fibers during pregnancy. Anesth Analg 1983; 61:1070.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks GZ, Mandel ALZ: The early postpartum dermatomal spread of epidural 2-chloroprocaine, in Abstracts of Scientific Papers. Annual meeting of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, San Antonio, 1984, p 25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy D, Nally B, Gardiner J, et al: Effect of metoclopramide on gastric emptying before elective and emergency caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56:1113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Datta S, Hurley RJ, Naulty JS: Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid progesterone concentrations in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Anesth Analg 1986; 65:950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Norris MC, Honet JE, Leighton BL, et al: A comparison of meperidine and lidocaine for spinal anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander, Wetchler BV, Thompson RE: Bupivacaine infiltration of the mesosalpinx in ambulatory surgical laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Can J Anaesth 1987; 34:362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bucklin BA, Smith CV: Postpartum tubal ligation safety, timing and other implications for anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:1269.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Postpartum Tubal Ligation. In: Obstetric Anesthesia Handbook. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31529-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31529-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-26075-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-31529-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics