Abstract
Skinner is commonly accused of being against neurophysiological explanations of behavior. However, in his writings, he did not criticize neuroscience itself as an important independent field from behavior analysis. The problem was in how some authors were using a pseudo-physiology in the explanation of behavior. Skinner was explicit in showing which authors and theories were using physiology incorrectly. Therefore, my goal is to present an analysis of the main targets of Skinner’s critiques against neurophysiological explanations of behavior. This analysis will be divided as follows: (a) the targets of Skinner’s critiques, (b) when the critiques were presented, and (c) the specific critiques that were made. The analysis was based upon 73 papers written by Skinner that were selected through keywords related to the issue. When placed in proper historical context, Skinner did not criticize neuroscience, but the misuse of pseudo-physiological theories in the explanation of behavior.
Notes
Skinner used different terms such as physiology, neurology, and neural science when referring to the sciences dedicated to studying the physiological mechanisms related to behavior. I chose to use neuroscience here because it is the most common term used in contemporary literature on the subject.
It is important to note that I only used the material present in the bibliography section of Morris et al. (2004). Although their analysis started with 289 texts, only a part of this material was selected for analysis and therefore mentioned in the bibliography. That is the reason why the present analysis was conducted with a smaller number (148) of texts.
References
Adolphs, R. (2013). The biology of fear. Current Biology, 23(2), 79–93.
Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.
Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
Burgos, J. E., & Donahoe, J. W. (2006). Of what value is philosophy to science? A review of max R. Bennett and P. M. S. Hacker’s Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003). Behavior and Philosophy, 34, 71–87.
Donahoe, J., & Palmer, D. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Feinstein, J., Buzza, C., Hurlemann, R., Follmer, R., Dahdaleh, N., Coryell, W., Welsh, M., Tranel, D., & Wemmie, J. (2013). Fear and panic in humans with bilateral amygdala damage. Nature Neuroscience, 16(3), 270–273. doi:10.1038/nn.3323.
Fermi, E. (1956). Thermodynamics. New York: Dover.
Fernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M. L. (2002). Cause and effect theories of attention: the role of conceptual metaphors. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 153–165.
Finger, S. (2000). Minds behind the brain: a history of the pioneers and their discoveries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Jacobson, M. (1993). Foundations of neuroscience. New York: Plenum.
Jones, F. N. (1939). Review of B. F. Skinner’s the behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 52(4), 659–660.
LeDoux, J. (2013). The slippery slope of fear. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 155–156.
Lee, V. (1985). Scientific knowledge as rules that guide behavior. The Psychological Record, 35, 183–192.
Loucks, R. B. (1941). The contribution of physiological psychology. Psychological Review, 48(2), 105–126.
Machamer, P. (2009). Learning, neuroscience, and the return of behaviorism. In J. Bickle (Ed.), The oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience (pp. 166–176). New York: Oxford University Press.
Marr, M. J., & Zilio, D. (2013). No island entire of itself: reductionism and behavior analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 14, 241–257.
Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 141–144.
Moore, J. (1981). On mentalism, methodological behaviorism, and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 9, 55–67.
Moore, J. (1994). On introspections and verbal reports. In S. Hayes, L. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 281–299). Reno: Context.
Moore, J. (2002). Some thoughts on the relation between behavior analysis and behavioral neuroscience. The Pyschological Record, 52, 261–279.
Moore, J. (2008). Conceptual foundations of radical behaviorism. New York: Sloan.
Moore, J. (2010). Behaviorism and the stages of scientific activity. Behavior Analyst, 33, 47–63.
Morris, E. K., Lazo, J. F., & Smith, N. G. (2004). Whether, when, and why Skinner published on biological participation in behavior. Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 153–169.
Panksepp, J. (1990). Can “mind” and behavior be understood without understanding the brain?: A response to Bunge. New Ideas in Psychology, 8(2), 139–149.
Pavlov, I. P. (1955). The conditioned reflex (S. Belsky, Trans.). In J. Gibbons (Ed.), I. P. Pavlov: selected works (pp. 245–270). Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House (Original work published 1934).
Pavlov, I. P. (1960). Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). New York: Dover. Original work published 1927.
Robinson, J. D. (2001). Mechanisms of synaptic transmission: bridging the gaps (1890-1990). New York: Oxford University Press.
Schaal, D. W. (2005). Naming our concerns about neuroscience: a review of Bennett and Hacker’s Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84(3), 683–692.
Schnaitter, R. (1984). Skinner on the “mental” and the “physical”. Behaviorism, 12(1), 1–14.
Schnaitter, R. (1986). Behavior as a function of inner states and outer circumstances. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), The analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 247–274). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Skinner, B. F. (1944). Review of principles of behavior by Clark L. Hull. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 276–281.
Skinner, B. F. (1946). Reviewed work(s): mathematical biophysics of the central nervous system by A. S. Householder, H. D. Landahl. The American Journal of Psychology, 59(1), 167–169.
Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57(4), 193–216.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). Critique of psychoanalytic concepts and theories. The Scientific Monthly, 79(5), 300–305.
Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. The American Psychologist, 11(5), 221–233.
Skinner, B. F. (1961a). The concept of reflex in the description of behavior. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Cumulative record: a selection of papers (2ªth ed., pp. 319–346). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1931).
Skinner, B. F. (1961b). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Cumulative record: a selection of papers (2ªth ed., pp. 347–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1935).
Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and human behavior. New York: Free (Original work published 1953).
Skinner, B. F. (1966a). Some responses to the stimulus “Pavlov”. Conditional Reflex: A Pavlovian Journal of Research & Therapy, 1(2), 74–78.
Skinner, B. F. (1966b). The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1938).
Skinner, B. F. (1966c). What is the experimental analysis of behavior? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9(3), 213–218.
Skinner, B. F. (1967). B. F. Skinner. In E. G. Boring & G. Lindzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 387–413). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969a). Contingencies of reinforcement: a theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969b). The inside story. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Contingencies of reinforcement: a theoretical analysis (pp. 269–297). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969c). The machine that is man. Psychology Today, 2(20–25), 60–63.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1975). The steep and thorny way to a science of behavior. American Psychologist, 30(1), 42–49.
Skinner, B. F. (1977). Why I am not a cognitive psychologist. Behaviorism, 5, 1–10.
Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist: part two of an autobiography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1980). Notebooks. New Jersey: Prentice-hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1983a). A matter of consequences: part three of an autobiography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1983b). Can the experimental analysis of behavior rescue psychology? Behavior Analyst, 6, 9–17.
Skinner, B. F. (1984). The shame of American education. American Psychologist, 39, 947–954.
Skinner, B. F. (1985). Cognitive science and behaviourism. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 291–301.
Skinner, B. F. (1986a). Review’s of Laurence D. Smith. Behaviorism and logical positivism: a reassessment of the alliance. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 23, 206–210.
Skinner, B. F. (1986b). Some thoughts about the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 229–235.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42(8), 780–786.
Skinner, B. F. (1988). Comments. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior: the operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: comments and consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1989a). The behavior of organisms at 50. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Recent issues in the analysis of behavior (pp. 121–136). Ohio: Merrill Publishing Company.
Skinner, B. F. (1989b). The operant side of behavior therapy. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Recent issues in the analysis of behavior (pp. 73–84). Ohio: Merrill Publishing Company (Original work published 1988).
Skinner, B. F. (1989c). The origins of cognitive thought. American Psychologist, 44, 13–18.
Skinner, B. F. (1989d). The place of feeling in the analysis of behavior. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Recent issues in the analysis of behavior (pp. 3–12). Ohio: Merrill Publishing Company.
Skinner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? American Psychologist, 45(11), 1206–1210.
Skinner, B. F. (1993). A world of our own. Behaviorology, 1, 3–5.
Skinner, B. F. (1998). The experimental analysis of operant behavior: a history. In R. W. Rieber & K. D. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: theoretical-historical perspectives (2ªth ed., pp. 289–298). Washington: American Psychological Association (Original work published 1980).
Skinner, B. F. (2009). Conversation between B. F. Skinner and E. O. Wilson. In P. Naour, E. O. Wilson, & B. F. Skinner (Eds.), A dialogue between sociobiology and radical behaviorism (pp. 61–85). New York: Springer.
Thompson, T. (2007). Relations among functional systems in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 423–440.
Zilio, D. (2013a). Filling the gaps: Skinner and the role of neuroscience in the explanation of behavior. Behavior and Philosophy, 40, 33–59.
Zilio. D. (2013b). Sherrington and the conceptual nervous system: an analysis of Skinner’s criticism of synapse. Paper session presented at the 39th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI). Minneapolis, MN.
Zilio, D. (2015). Sobre as críticas de Skinner à fisiologia: Indicadoras de orientação antifisiológica ou contribuições relevantes? [On Skinner’s criticisms of physiology: indicative of anti-physiological position or pertinent contributions?]. Acta Comportamentalia, 23(4), 465–482.
Zilio, D., & Carrara, K. (2008). Mentalismo e explicação do comportamento: Aspectos da crítica behaviorista radical à ciência cognitiva [Mentalism and the explanation of behavior: aspects of the radical behaviorist criticism of cognitive science]. Acta Comportamentalia, 16(3), 399–417.
Zuriff, G. E. (1979). Covert events: the logical status of first-person reports. The Psychological Record, 29, 125–133.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by FAPESP–São Paulo Research Foundation (2009/18324-1, 2013/17950-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zilio, D. Who, What, and When: Skinner’s Critiques of Neuroscience and His Main Targets. BEHAV ANALYST 39, 197–218 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0053-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0053-x