Abstract
The scalable XCAT voxelised phantom was used with the GATE Monte Carlo toolkit to investigate the effect of voxel size on dosimetry estimates of internally distributed radionuclide calculated using direct Monte Carlo simulation. A uniformly distributed Fluorine-18 source was simulated in the Kidneys of the XCAT phantom with the organ self dose (kidney ← kidney) and organ cross dose (liver ← kidney) being calculated for a number of organ and voxel sizes. Patient specific dose factors (DF) from a clinically acquired FDG PET/CT study have also been calculated for kidney self dose and liver ← kidney cross dose. Using the XCAT phantom it was found that significantly small voxel sizes are required to achieve accurate calculation of organ self dose. It has also been used to show that a voxel size of 2 mm or less is suitable for accurate calculations of organ cross dose. To compensate for insufficient voxel sampling a correction factor is proposed. This correction factor is applied to the patient specific dose factors calculated with the native voxel size of the PET/CT study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Denis-Bacelar AM, Romanchikova M, Chittenden S, Saran FH, Mandeville H, Du Y, Flux GD (2013) Patient-specific dosimetry for intracavitary 32p-chromic phosphate colloid therapy of cystic brain tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 40:1532–1541
Zankl M, Petoussi-Henss N, Fill U, Regulla D (2003) The application of voxel phantoms to the internal dosimetry of radionuclides. Radiat Protect Dosim 105(1–4):539
Segars W, Tsui B (2009) Mcat to xcat: the evolution of 4-d computerized phantoms for imaging research. Proc IEEE 97(12):1954–1968
Piegl L (1991) On nurbs: a survey. Comput Graph Appl 11(1):55–71
Stabin M, Sparks R, Crowe E (2005) Olinda/exm: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 46(6):1023
Jan S, Santin G, Strul D, Staelens S, Assié K, Autret D, Avner S, Barbier R, Bardiès M, Bloomfield PM et al (2004) Gate: a simulation toolkit for pet and spect. Phys Med Biol 49:4543–4561
Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Araujo H, Arce P, Asai M, Axen D, Banerjee S, Barrand G et al (2003) Geant4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Method Phys Res Sect A 506(3):250–303
Jan S, Santin G, Strul D, Staelens S, Assié K, Autret D, Avner S, Barbier R, Bardiès M, Bloomfield PM, et al. (2007) GATE users guide. http://www.opengatecollaboration.org
Loevinger R, Budinger T, Watson E (1988) Mird primer for absorbed dose calculations. The Society of Nuclear Medicine, New York
Stabin M, Siegel J, Sparks R, Eckerman K, Breitz H (2001) Contribution to red marrow absorbed dose from total body activity: a correction to the Mird method. J Nucl Med 42(3):492
Williams L, Liu A, Yamauchi D, Lopatin G, Raubitschek A, Wong J (2002) The two types of correction of absorbed dose estimates for internal emitters. Cancer 94(S4):1231–1234
Howell R, Wessels B, Loevinger R, Watson E, Bolch W, Brill A, Charkes N, Fisher D, Hays M, Robertson J et al (1999) The Mird perspective 1999. Medical internal radiation dose committee. J Nucl Med 40(1):3S–10S
Cloutier RJ, Edwards CL, Snyder WS (1970) Medical radionuclides: radiation dose and effects. J Radiat Biol 18(4):399
Browne J, De Pierro A (1996) A row-action alternative to the em algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 15(5):687–699
Saunder T (2006) Wasabi, medical image quantitative analysis and visualisation package. http://wasabi.petnm.unimelb.edu.au/index.html
Snyder W, Ford M, Warner G, Watson S (1975) S”: absorbed dose per unit cumulated activity for selected radionuclides and organs. Mird pamphlet no. 11. Society of Nuclear Medicine, New York
Stabin M (1996) Mirdose: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 37(3):538
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the assistance of staff from the Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Rick Franich, Dr. Jianfeng He, Mr. Tim Saunder, Mr. Gareth Jones and Dr. Sylvia J Gong.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hickson, K.J., O’Keefe, G.J. Effect of voxel size when calculating patient specific radionuclide dosimetry estimates using direct Monte Carlo simulation. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 37, 495–503 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0277-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0277-6