Skip to main content
Log in

The Gentle Neoliberalism of Modern Anti-bullying Texts: Surveillance, Intervention, and Bystanders in Contemporary Bullying Discourse

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author argues for the concept of "gentle" neoliberalism to account for how discourse in anti-bullying texts has increasingly presented itself as gentle and kind, while simultaneously reinforcing systems of surveillance and control. Results, based on a grounded theory analysis of 22 anti-bullying books, reveal that the texts generally decoupled bullying from power relations based on sexuality, overlooking homophobia and heteronormativity and marginalizing the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. Further, findings demonstrate a shift over time in the texts from an explicitly harsh description of the bullies to a seemingly kinder emphasis on reporting and intervening on behalf of the individual being bullied. This shift to interventionist discourse potentially expands mechanisms of control and reinforces inequalities based on race and social class, as bystanders are increasingly held accountable and students are encouraged to report their peers to authority figures. In response to neoliberal anti-bullying discourse, the author argues for scholarship and policy solutions that undermine unequal power structures and yet also oppose surveillance strategies of monitoring, reporting, and intervening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, M. (1983). Social research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, O., & Jindasurat, C. (2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and hiv-affected hate violence in 2013. National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, Retrieved 1 July 2015, from http://www.avp.org/storage/documents/2013_ncavp_hvreport_final.pdf.

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansel, P., Davies, B., Lewis, C., & Linnell, S. (2009). Bullies, bullying and power in the contexts of schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015). The agency line: a neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, A. (2004). Theoretical coding: text analysis in grounded theory. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steink (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 270–275). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brank, E. M., Hoetger, L. A., & Hazen, K. P. (2012). Bullying. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: on the surveillance of blackness. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2013). Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 26–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, M. A., & Cohen, J. N. (2012). The arc of neoliberalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. W., & Brooks, R. A. (2014). Confronting school bullying: kids, culture, and the making of a social problem. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K., van Beusekom, G., Bos, H., & Sandfort, T. (2013). Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression related peer victimization in adolescence: a systematic review of associated psychosocial and health outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3-4), 299–317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J. (2011). The end of neoliberalism? What is left of the left. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 637(1), 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Randall, D., Ambrose, A., & Orand, M. (2015). “I was bullied too”: stories of bullying and coping in an online community. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2011). The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S. (2014). “Who’s to blame?” Constructing the responsible sexual agent in neoliberal sex education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(3), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, P. K. (2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 857–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. A. (2001). Bad boys: public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (2010). The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode, 41(s1), 166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, J., Mamo, L., Gilbert, J., & Lesko, N. (2014). Beyond bullying. Contexts, 13(4), 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., Freudenberg, N., Payne, Y., Perkins, T., Smith, K., & Wanzer, K. (2003). “Anything can happen with police around”: urban youth evaluate strategies of surveillance in public places. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, V. (2015). Constructing the victim in the bullying narrative: how bullying discourses affirm rather than challenge discriminatory notions of gender and sexuality. Crime, Media, Culture, 11(2), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formby, E. (2013). Understanding and responding to homophobia and bullying: contrasting staff and young people’s views within community settings in England. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 10(4), 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formby, E. (2015). Limitations of focusing on homophobic, biphobic and transphobic ‘bullying’ to understand and address LGBT young people’s experiences within and beyond school. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 15(6), 626–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galitz, T., & Robert, D. (2014). Governing bullying through the new public health model: a Foucaultian analysis of a school anti-bullying programme. Critical Public Health, 24(2), 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlinger, J., & Turner, S. F. (2015). California’s public safety realignment correctional policy based on stakes rather than risk. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(8), 805–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, I. (2011). Neoliberal agency. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2008). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25(1), 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: The Sociological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M., Bobrowicz, A., & Ang, C. S. (2015). The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community online: discussions of bullying and self-disclosure in YouTube videos. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(7), 704–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzanka, P. R., & Mann, E. S. (2014). Queer youth suicide and the psychopolitics of “it gets better.” Sexualities, 17(4), 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgers, M. (2013). Embodying neoliberalism: thoughts and responses to critics. Social Anthropology, 21(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfield, P., & Celinska, K. (2011). Beyond fear: sociological perspectives on the criminalization of school discipline. Sociology Compass, 5(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L. (2013). Publishers revel in youthful cruelty (p. C1). New York: The New York Times.

  • Kupchik, A., & Monahan, T. (2006). The new American school: preparation for post‐industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(5), 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marying, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steink (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 266–269). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. (2014). Resisting hate crime discourse: queer and intersectional challenges to neoliberal hate crime laws. Critical Criminology, 22(1), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. (2015). Violence against queer people: race, class, gender, and the persistence of anti-LGBT discrimination. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: how neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oppliger, P., & Davis, A. (2015). Portrayals of bullying: a content analysis of picture books for preschoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0734-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paceley, M., & Flynn, K. (2012). Media representations of bullying toward queer youth: gender, race, and age discrepancies. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(4), 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2013). Notes on a sociology of bullying: young men’s homophobia as gender socialization (pp. 87–104). QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, Inaugural Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, E., & Smith, M. (2013). LGBTQ kids, school safety, and missing the big picture: how the dominant bullying discourse prevents school professionals from thinking about systemic marginalization or…why we need to rethink LGBTQ bullying (pp. 1–36). QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, Inaugural Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2010). Postneoliberalism and its malcontents. Antipode, 41(s1), 94–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2012). Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the great recession. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(2), 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving ophelia: saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T., & Meiners, E. R. (2013). From anti-bullying laws and gay marriages to queer worlds and just futures (pp. 149–176). QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, Inaugural Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J. (2008). “Just be friends”: exposing the limits of educational bully discourses for understanding teen girls’ heterosexualized friendships and conflicts. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(5), 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2010). Normative cruelties and gender deviants: the performative effects of bully discourses for girls and boys in school. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., Kupferberg, A., Mora-Merchan, J., Samara, M., Bosley, S., & Osborn, R. (2012). A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: a follow-up after six years. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spade, D. (2011). Normal life: administrative violence, critical trans politics and the limits of law. Brooklyn: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (2013). Surveillance schools: security, discipline and control in contemporary education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R. (2011). “She’s weird!”—the social construction of bullying in school: a review of qualitative research. Children & Society, 25(4), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, G. (2005a). “Bullying widespread”: a critical analysis of research and public discourse on bullying. Journal of School Violence, 4(1), 91–118.

  • Walton, G. (2005b). The notion of bullying through the lens of Foucault and critical theory. Journal of Educational Thought, 39(1), 55–73.

  • Wayne, R. (2013). The social construction of childhood bullying through U.S. news media. Journal of Contemporary Anthropology, 4(1), Article 3. Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jca/vol4/iss1/3.

  • Weaver, L. M., Brown, J. R., Weddle, D. B., & Aalsma, M. C. (2013). A content analysis of protective factors within states’ antibullying laws. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 156–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, K. (2016). Animate planet: making visceral sense of living in a high-tech ecologically damaged world. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doug Meyer.

Ethics declarations

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, D. The Gentle Neoliberalism of Modern Anti-bullying Texts: Surveillance, Intervention, and Bystanders in Contemporary Bullying Discourse. Sex Res Soc Policy 13, 356–370 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0238-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0238-9

Keywords

Navigation