Skip to main content
Log in

Symbols, Meaning, and Origins of Mind

  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mind maps symbols and the extra-symbolic relationships amongst them to specific meanings. When symbols of various levels are placed in a hierarchical ordering, one may look at such ordered classes as distinct worlds where one class represents objects and the other represents the objects’ corresponding meanings. However, such an explanation can only be partial because the number of potential levels in such an ordering is infinite and, therefore, it engenders problems of recursion and infinite regress. There are also logical problems in the form of paradoxes that emanate from the consideration of sets of sets. Given that most prior studies only consider symbols that are classical objects in associative relationships, we argue that there is a need to also consider objects with shifting boundaries and quantum objects. We believe that objects belonging to each of these three classes—that is classical objects, objects with shifting boundaries, and quantum objects—play a role in the workings of the mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ader, R., Felten, D. L., & Cohen, N. (Eds.). (1990). Psychoneuroimmunology. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2008). Is the cell a semiotic system? In M. Barbeiri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics (pp. 179–207). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, M. I., Turin, L., Mershin, A., & Skoulakis, E. M. C. (2011). Molecular vibration-sensing component in Drosophila melanogaster olfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3797–3802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1954). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (1996). Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: a model for consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Riddles of natural categorization. Philosophical Transactions. Royal Society of London, B308, 29–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kak, S. (1996). The three languages of the brain: quantum, reorganizational, and associative. In K. Pribram & J. King (Eds.), Learning as self-organization (pp. 185–219). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kak, S. (2000). Active agents, intelligence, and quantum computing. Information Sciences, 128, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kak, S. (2004). The architecture of knowledge. New Delhi: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kak, S. (2009). The universe, quantum physics, and consciousness. Journal of Cosmology, 3, 500–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kak, S. (2011). The nature of light and epistemology. SPIE Conference on The Nature of Light: What are Photons IV? August 2011.

  • Kak, S. (2012). Higher order and the origin of complex structures. In L. Stillwaggon Swan, R. Gordon, & J. Seckbach (Eds.), Origin(s) of design in nature. Springer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. (1989). Schrődinger: Life and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Page, C. C., Moser, C. C., Chen, X., & Dutton, P. L. (1999). Natural engineering principles of electron tunneling in biological oxidation-reduction. Nature, 402, 47–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (2005). The road to reality. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O. (1985). The man who mistook his wife for a hat. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1965). What is life? New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. M., Stapp, H. P., & Beauregard, M. (2005). Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B29, 1309–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, H. P. (1993). Mind, matter, and quantum mechanics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Swan, L. S., & Goldberg, L. J. (2010a). Biosymbols: symbols in life and mind. Biosemiotics, 3, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, L. S., & Goldberg, L. J. (2010b). How is meaning grounded in the organism? Biosemiotics, 3, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turin, L. (1996). A spectroscopic mechanism for primary olfactory reception. Chemical Senses, 21, 773–791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, E. A. (1995). The conceptual abilities of pigeons. American Scientist, 83, 246–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickaramasinghe, C. (2009). Astrobiology, comets and the origin of life. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhash Kak.

Additional information

Special Issue “Origins of Mind” edited by Liz Stillwaggon Swan and Andrew M. Winters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gautam, A., Kak, S. Symbols, Meaning, and Origins of Mind. Biosemiotics 6, 301–310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9169-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9169-5

Keywords

Navigation