Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Professionalization and evaluation: The case of Indian agricultural research

  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

This paper examines the role of evaluation in promoting and sustaining professionalism in agricultural research organizations. The evaluation experience of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) reveals a series of attempts to review and institutionalize the essential features of professionalism: expertise, credentialism, and autonomy. The central thesis is that when evaluations inform or enable major changes in one or more of these features of professionalism, over a period of time, it is a sign of increasing professionalization of research. Following a brief introduction, the evaluation experiences of ICAR are examined in the context of the evolution of the profession of agricultural research. Specific evaluation experiences are then analyzed, with an emphasis on the role of evaluation in resolving the tension between bureaucratic and professional decision making. The paper concludes that unless stringent evaluations are introduced in ICAR, the professionalization of agricultural research in India will remain incomplete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, R.M. (1986). The role of evaluation of national agricultural research systems: A report on the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Agricultural Production Team (1959). Report on India’s food crisis and steps to meet it. Report sponsored by the Ford Foundation. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Food and Agriculture and Ministry of Community Development and Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amark, K. (1990). Open cartels and social closures: Professional strategies in Sweden, 1860–1950. In M. Burrage and R. Torstendahl (eds.). Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions, pp. 94–114. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agricultural Research Service Scientists Forum (ARSSF) (1987). Memorandum of the Agricultural Research Service Scientists Forum to the ICAR review committee. New Delhi: ARSSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, H.K., and Kahlon, A.S. (1977). Methodological issues on measurement of returns to investment in agricultural research. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 32(3):181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala Ravi, S., and Bandyopadhyaya, A. (1988). An analysis of the functioning of the research project design, management and evaluation in the ICAR system. In K.V. Raman, R. Choudhary, A. Bandyopadhyaya, and S. Maiti (eds.). National symposium on the role of scientific research and its management in accelerating socio-economic transformation. pp. 127–142. New Delhi: Agricole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaguru, T. and Raman, K.V. (1988). Agricultural research system in India. In: K.V. Raman, M.M. Anwer, and R.B. Gaddagimath (eds.). Agricultural research systems and management in the 21st Century, pp. 95–121. Proceedings of the International Seminar, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Dec. 8–10, 1987. Rajendranagar, Hyderabad: National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (NAARM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, S. (1990). Professionalization: Borderline authority and autonomy in work. In M. Burrage and R. Torstendahl (eds.). Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of professions, pp. 115–138. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S.D. (1989). The role of management information in agricultural research policy, planning and management in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Report submitted to the ODA and ICAR. Norwich: Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrage, M. and Torstendahl, R. (eds.). (1990). Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of professions. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (1988). Universities for development: Report of the joint Indo-US impact evaluation of the Indian agricultural universities. AID project impact evaluation report No. 68. Washington, D.C.: US Agency for International Development (USAID).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, R. and Dahiya, P.S. (1988). “Agricultural Research Service—An Appraisal After Twelve Years of its Introduction” In Raman et al. (eds.) National symposium on the Role of Scientific Research and its Management in Accelerating Socio-Economic Transformation. pp. 196–202. New Delhi: Agricole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, K., Gaikwad, V.R., and Bhatacharya, S.K. (1972). An organization study of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Ahemedabad: Indian Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elz, D. (ed.). (1984). The planning and management of agricultural research: A World Bank and ISNAR symposium. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R. (1975). Technology generation in agriculture. In L. Reynolds (ed.). Agriculture in development theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R. and Jha, D. (1973). The contribution of agricultural research system to agricultural production in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 28(4):212–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, B.H. (ed.) (1977). The Green Revolution? Technology Change in Rice Growing Areas of Tamil Nadu and SriLanka. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floud, Sir, F.L.C. (1927). The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. London: G.P. Putnams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1984). Are professions necessary? In T.L. Haskell (ed.). The authority of experts: Studies in history and theory. pp. 3–27. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation. (1976). Report of the National Commission on Agriculture. Part XI: Research, education and extension. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture. (1964). Report of the agricultural research review team. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Food and Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., Gaikwad, V.R., Khandwalla, P.N., Pandey, I.M., and Srivastava, U.K. (1991). Reorganization for revitalization: Issues and perspectives. Report on the reorganization of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research headquarters. Ahmedabad: Centre for Management in Agriculture, Indian Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, J.M. (1978). Interest groups and the demand for agricultural research. Journal of Political Economy, 86(3):467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, K. (1993). Institutions and Agricultural Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 27(3):849–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, H.W. (1956). Blue print for a Rural University in India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D. (1986). Assessing the impact of international agricultural research and development programs. World Development, 14(4):453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D. (1990). Assessing the impact of international research: Concepts and challenges. In R.G. Echeverría (ed.). Methods for diagnosing research system constraints and assessing the impact of agricultural research. Vol. 2, pp. 43–66. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D., Ballantyne, P., Peterson, W., Uribe, B., Gapasin, D., and Sheridan, K. (eds.). (1993). Monitoring and evaluating agricultural research: A sourcebook. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W.E. and Miranowski, J.A. (1981). An economic analysis of expenditures on agricultural experiment station research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(1):104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • India, Famine Commission (1901). Report of the Indian Famine Commission, 1901. Calcutta.

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1944). Memorandum on the development of agriculture and animal husbandry in India from the Advisory Board of the Imperial Council of Agricultural Research. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1955). Report of the joint Indo-American team on agricultural research and education. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1960). Report of the second Indo-American team on agricultural education research and extension. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1973). Report of the ICAR Enquiry Committee. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1978). Report of the review committee on agricultural universities. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1979). 50 years of agricultural research and education. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1988). Report of the ICAR review committee. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (1998). The National Agricultural Technology Project—Project Summary. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlon, A.S., Bal, H.K., Saxena, P.N., and Jha, D. (1977). Returns to investment in agricultural research in India. In T.M. Arndt, D.G. Dalrymple, and V.W. Ruttan (eds.). Resource allocation and productivity in national and international agricultural research. pp. 124–147. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, A. (ed.). (1975). Self immolation of a scientist: A memoir to Dr. Vinod H. Shah, M.Sc., Ph.D. Ahmedabad: J.H. Shah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lele, U. and Goldsmith, O. (1989). The development of national agricultural research capacity: India’s experience with the Rockefeller Foundation and its significance for Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 37(2):305–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. and Longhurst, R. (1985). Modern varieties, international agricultural research, and the poor. CGIAR Study Paper No. 2. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, R. (1974). Contribution of research and extension to productivity change in Indian agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 9(39):97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, K.C. and Sankaram, A. (1972). History of agricultural universities in India. New Delhi: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, B.P. (1979). Organization and growth. I: ICAR. (Ed.). 50 years of agriculture research and education. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, I. (1972). Science and agricultural production. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardey, G.P. and Roseboom, J. (1989). ISNAR Agriultural Research Indicator Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paroda, R.S. (1998) Untitled communication. ICAR News. 4(1):20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, R.G. and Waghmare, R.E. (1977). The contribution of sugarcane research and development to sugarcane production in Maharashtra (A summary). Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 32(3):239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñeiro, M. and Trigo, E.J. (eds.). (1983). Technical change and social conflict in agriculture: Latin American perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahladachar, M. (1983). Income distribution effects of the green revolution in India: A review of empirical evidence. World Development, 11(11):927–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raina, R.S. (1996). The evolution of Indian agricultural research: Organizational insights. ISNAR Discussion Paper No. 96-2. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raina, R.S. (1997). Public Patronage and Political Neutrality in Agricultural Research: Lessons from British experience, Economic and Political Weekly, 32(39):2473–2485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeswari, S. (1992). The organization of agricultural research in India: An economic analysis of technology generation, 1860–1990. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the University of Kerala. Trivandrum: Centre for Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeswari, S. (1995). Agricultural research effort: Conceptual clarity and measurement. World Development, 23(4):617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, K.V., Anwer, M.M., and Gaddagimath, R.B. (eds.). (1987). Agricultural research systems and management in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the NAARM International Seminar, Rajendranagar, December 10, 1987. Rajendranagar, Hyderabad: National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (NAARM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, K.V., Choudhary, R., Bandyopadhyaya, A., and Maiti, S. (eds.). (1988). National symposium on the role of scientific research and its management in accelerating socio-economic transformation. New Delhi: Agricole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, M.S. (1986). A history of agriculture in India (IV). New Delhi: Imperial Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, N.S. (1987). Organization of agricultural research: An overview of its organization, management and operations. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheteau, G., Bennel, P., McLean, D., and Elliot, H. (1988). Organizational, Financial and Human Resource Issues Facing West African agricultural research systems. ISNAR Working Paper, No. 9. The Hague: ISNAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockefeller Foundation (1982). Science for agriculture: The Winrock Report. Workshop on Critical Issues in American Agricultural Research, Arkansas NY, June 14–15, 1982. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. and Evenson, R. (1985). The political economy of agricultural research and extension: Grants, votes and reappointment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Agriculture (RCA). (1928). Report of the Royal Commission on Agriculture. Bombay: Government of India, Central Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E.J., Sir (1966). A history of agricultural science in Great Britain, 1620–1954. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, P.N. (1979). Returns on investment in research and education. In ICAR (ed.). 50 years of agriculture research and education. pp. 150–155. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, S. (1990). Associative strategies in the process of profesionalization: Professional strategies and scientification of occupations. In M. Burrage and R. Torstendahl (eds.), Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of professions. pp. 139–150. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. (1977). Returns to investment on agricultural research in the Punjab. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 32(3):202–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaraman, B. (1991). Bitter sweet: Governance of India in transition (Memoirs of B. Sivaraman). New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, C. (1972). A new strategy in agriculture. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M.S. (1969). Scientific implications of HYV program. Economic and Political Weekly, 4(1):67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigo, E.J. (1984). Evaluating research programs and institutions: A management perspective. In D. Elz (ed.). The planning and management of agricultural research: A World Bank and ISNAR Symposium. pp. 112–117. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) (1974). The social and economic implications of large-scale introduction on new varieties of food grain: Summary of conclusions of a global research project. Geneva: UNRISD

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu, K., Subba Rao, K.V., and Raghavendra Rao, V. (1987). Management of all India co-ordinated research projects and their role in national agricultural research system. In K.V. Raman, M.M. Anwer, and R.B. Gaddagimath (eds.). Agricultural research systems and management in the 21st Century, Proceedings of the NAARM International Seminar, Rajendranagar, December 10, 1987. pp. 135–146. Rajendranagar, Hyderabad: National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (NAARM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voelcker, J.A. (1893). Report on the improvement of Indian agriculture. London, UK: Eyre and Spottiswoode for her Majesty’s Government. Reprinted in 1986 by Agricole Reprints Corporation, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1990). Agricultural research in India: Prologue, performance and prospects. Agricultural Operations Division, Asia region. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NISTADS, Dr. KS Krishnan Road, 110 012, Pusa, New Delhi, India

    Rajeswari Sarala Raina (economist at the Technological and Social Change Group)

Authors
  1. Rajeswari Sarala Raina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeswari Sarala Raina.

Additional information

Graduated in agricultural sciences at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, she obtained her doctoral degree at the Kerala Agricultural University in 1994. She started her professional career as an agricultural extension officer at the State Department of Agriculture in Kerala. She has published on research organization, measurement of research efforts, history and evolution of agricultural science, priority setting, research decision-making, and reforms in agricultural education and training. Her current research focuses on impact of soil-science technologies, development of key disciplines in agricultural chemistry within an evolutionary economics perspective, and institutional and policy implications of changes in agricultural science.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raina, R.S. Professionalization and evaluation: The case of Indian agricultural research. Know Techn Pol 11, 69–96 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-999-1004-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-999-1004-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation