Abstract
This study develops a simplified model describing the evolutionary dynamics of a population composed of obligate sexually and asexually reproducing, unicellular organisms. The model assumes that the organisms have diploid genomes consisting of two chromosomes, and that the sexual organisms replicate by first dividing into haploid intermediates, which then combine with other haploids, followed by the normal mitotic division of the resulting diploid into two new daughter cells. We assume that the fitness landscape of the diploids is analogous to the single-fitness-peak approach often used in single-chromosome studies. That is, we assume a master chromosome that becomes defective with just one point mutation. The diploid fitness then depends on whether the genome has zero, one, or two copies of the master chromosome. We also assume that only pairs of haploids with a master chromosome are capable of combining so as to produce sexual diploid cells, and that this process is described by second-order kinetics. We find that, in a range of intermediate values of the replication fidelity, sexually reproducing cells can outcompete asexual ones, provided the initial abundance of sexual cells is above some threshold value. The range of values where sexual reproduction outcompetes asexual reproduction increases with decreasing replication rate and increasing population density. We critically evaluate a common approach, based on a group selection perspective, used to study the competition between populations and show its flaws in addressing the evolution of sex problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal AF (2006) Evolution of sex: Why do organisms shuffle their genotypes? Curr Biol 16:R696–R704
Allee WC (1931) Animal aggregations. A study in general sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Alves D, Fontanari JF (1997) Error threshold in the evolution of diploid organisms. J Phys A 30:2601–2607
Azevedo RBR, Lohaus R, Srinivasan S, Dang KK, Burch CL (2006) Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature 440:87–90
Bell G (1982) The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. Croom Helm, London
Bernardes AT (1997) Can males contribute to the genetic improvement of a species? J Stat Phys 86:431–439
Bernstein H, Byerly HC, Hopf FA, Michod RE (1984) Origin of sex. J Theor Biol 110:323–351
Bruggeman J, Debets AJM, Wijngaarden PJ, de Visser JAGM, Hoekstra RF (2003) Sex slows down the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the homothallic fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 164:479–485
Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B (1999) Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol 14:405–410
Crow JF, Kimura M (1965) Evolution in sexual and asexual populations. Am Nat 99:439–450
Cui Y, Chen RS, Wong WH (2000) The coevolution of cell senescence and diploid sexual reproduction in unicellular organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3330–3335
Drake JW (1999) The distribution of rates of spontaneous mutation over viruses, prokaryotes, and eukaryotes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 870:100–107
Eigen M (1971) Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58:465–523
Hamilton WD, Axelrod R, Tanese R (1990) Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:3566–3573
Hastings IM (1991) Germline selection: population genetic aspects of the sexual/asexual life cycle. Genetics 129:1167–1176
Howard RS, Lively CM (1994) Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex. Nature 367:554–557
Hurst LD, Peck JR (1996) Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex. Trends Evol Ecol 11:46–52
Jokela J, Lively CM (1995) Parasites, sex, and early reproduction in a mixed population of freshwater snails. Evolution 49:1268–1271
Kondrashov AS, Crow JF (1991) Haploidy or diploidy: which is better? Nature 351:314–315
Lee B, Tannenbaum E (2007) Asexual and sexual replication in sporulating organisms. Phys Rev E 76:021909
Maynard-Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Michod RE (1995) Eros and evolution: a natural philosophy of sex. Addison-Wesley, New York
Misevic D, Ofria C, Lensky RE (2006) Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:457–464
Morrison A, Johnson AL, Johnston LH, Sugino A (1993) Pathway correcting DNA replication errors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 12:1467–1473
Muller JH (1964) The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat Res 1:2–9
Nedelcu AM, Marcu O, Michod RE (2004) Sex as a response to oxidative stress: a twofold increase in cellular reactive oxygen species activates sex genes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271:1591–1596
Paland S, Lynch M (2006) Transitions to asexuality result in excess amino-acid substitutions. Science 311:990–992
Pekalski A (2000) Model of evolution with sexual and non-sexual reproduction. Eur Phys J B 13:791–796
Penna TJP (1995) A bit-string model for biological aging. J Stat Phys 78:1629–1633
Perrot V, Richerd S, Valéro M (1991) Transition from haploidy to diploidy. Nature 351:315–317
Rosas A, Ferreira CP, Fontanari JF (2002) Evolution of protein synthesis in a lattice model of replicators. Phys Rev Lett 89:188101
Stauffer D (1999) Why care about sex? Some Monte Carlo justification. Physica A 273:132–139
Stauffer D, de Oliveira PMC, de Oliveira SM, dos Santos RMZ (1996) Monte Carlo simulations of sexual reproduction. Physica A 231:504–514
Tannenbaum E (2006) Selective advantage for sexual reproduction. Phys Rev E 73:061925
Tüzel E, Sevim V, Erzan A (2001) Evolutionary route to diploidy and sex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13774–13777
de Visser JAGM, Elena SF (2007) The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nat Genet 8:139–149
Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Xu J (2005) Cost of interacting with sexual partners in a facultative sexual microbe. Genetics 171:1597–1604
Acknowledgments
JFF thanks the hospitality of the School of Biology at the Georgia Institute of Technology, where this research was initiated. JFF is supported in part by CNPq and FAPESP, Project No. 04/06156-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tannenbaum, E., Fontanari, J.F. A quasispecies approach to the evolution of sexual replication in unicellular organisms. Theory Biosci. 127, 53–65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-008-0023-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-008-0023-2