Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Employment following chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma: a prospective case series

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for glioblastoma (GBM) has resulted in longer survival. Uncertainties exist regarding quality of survival. This study aims to determine the rate of patients returning to previous employment (EM) following treatment.

Methods

Eligible patients were diagnosed with GBM, aged 18–70 years, and treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy to 60 Gray and TMZ (EORTC Protocol) between July 2007 and July 2011. EM was defined as paid work. Exclusion criteria included patients without histological confirmation of WHO grade IV glioblastoma, those not in paid employment in the 2-month period prior to diagnosis, or mothers of pre-school aged children not working. Data were collected on EM prior (EM pre) and after RT at 6 and 12 months (EM 6 m, EM 12 m). Rate of EM was analysed in regards to baseline performance status (ECOG), neurological deficits (MRC scale) and median survival.

Results

One hundred twelve patients were identified with median follow-up of 15.5 months and median survival 18 months (95%CI, 15–21 months). Seventy-one patients were working prior to diagnosis and eligible for analysis. Twenty patients returned to work (28 %) by EM 6 months and 19 patients (27 %) by EM 12 months. EM 6 months was strongly associated with ECOG and MRC status, with only 1 of 37 patients (3 %) with neurological deficit returning to work compared with 21 of 36 (58 %) intact patients. Of good performance status patients not returning to work, factors included presence of income insurance, family financial support or treatment-related symptoms.

Conclusion

A modest proportion of patients with GBM return back to work at 6 and 12 months following radiotherapy with the majority demonstrating the lowest level of neurological deficit prior to RT.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Return to work following treatment does occur but it is not a common outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Source: “Statistics on Incidence, Survival Rates and Mortality Associated with Brain Tumours in Australia”, Information Paper for the Australian Brain Tumour Advocacy Group, Denise Chang, June 2003.

References

  1. Chandana SR, Movva S, Arora M, Singh T. Primary brain tumors in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(10):1423–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dobes M, Khurana VG, Shadbolt B, Jain S, Smith SF, Smee R, et al. Increasing incidence of glioblastoma multiforme and meningioma, and decreasing incidence of Schwannoma (2000–2008): findings of a multicenter Australian study. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:176.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJB, Janzer RC, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rønning PA, Helseth E, Meling TR, Johannesen TB. A population-based study on the effect of temozolomide in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro-oncology. 2012;14(9):1178–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson DR, O’Neill BP. Glioblastoma survival in the United States before and during the temozolomide era. J Neurooncol. 2012;107(2):359–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinbach J, Blaicher H, Herrlinger U, Wick W, Nagele T, Meyermann R, et al. Surviving glioblastoma for more than 5 years: the patient’s perspective. Neurology. 2006;66(2):239–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Remer S, Murphy M. The challenges of long-term treatment outcomes in adults with malignant gliomas. Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2004;8(4):368–76 [Review] [36 refs][Erratum appears in Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2004 Oct;8(5):448].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hahn C, Dunn R, Logue P, King J, Edwards C, Halperin E. Prospective study of neuropsychologic testing and quality-of-life assessment of adults with primary malignant brain tumors. Journal of Radiation Oncology. 2003;55(4):992–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Efficace F, Bottomley A. Assessing HRQOL: a neglected issue for high-grade glioma. The Lancet Oncology. 2003;4(1):11–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mauer M, Stupp R, Taphoorn MJB, Coens C, Osoba D, Marosi C, et al. The prognostic value of health-related quality-of-life data in predicting survival in glioblastoma cancer patients: results from an international randomised phase III EORTC Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups, and NCIC Clinical Trials Group study. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(3):302–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyers C, Hess K. Multifaceted end points in brain tumor clinical trials: cognitive deterioration precedes MRI progression. Neuro-Oncology. 2003;5(2):89–95.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinberg L, Wallner K, Malkin MG. Good performance status of long-term disease-free survivors of intracranial gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26(1):129–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschmaier M, Steiner JF. A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2005;14(11):992–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyons M, Orozovic N, Davis J, Newman J. Doing-being-becoming: occupational experiences of persons with life-threatening illnesses. Journal of Occupational Therapy May. 2002;56(3):285–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Freedman RI, Fesko SL. The meaning of work in the lives of people with significant disabilities: consumer and family perspectives. Journal of Rehabilitation. 1996;62(3):49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2010;4(4):415–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Boer AM, Taskila T, Ojajärvi A, van Dijk FH, Verbeek JM. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA. 2009;301(7):753–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dyck PJ, Boes CJ, Mulder D, Millikan C, Windebank AJ, Dyck PJB, et al. History of standard scoring, notation, and summation of neuromuscular signs. A current survey and recommendation. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2005;10(2):158–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Statistics c = AU; o = Commonwealth of A ou = Australian B of. Details—about this release [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 25]. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1220.01997?OpenDocument

  20. Taphoorn MJ, Stupp R, Coens C, Osoba D, Kortmann R, van den Bent MJ, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with glioblastoma: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2005;6(12):937–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Giovagnoli A. Quality of life in patients with stable disease after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for malignant brain tumour. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67(3):358–63.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(5):472–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ganz PA, Haskell CM, Figlin RA, La Soto N, Siau J. Estimating the quality of life in a clinical trial of patients with metastatic lung cancer using the Karnofsky performance status and the Functional Living Index–Cancer. Cancer. 1988;61(4):849–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Butler Jr JM, Case LD, Atkins J, Frizzell B, Sanders G, Griffin P, et al. A phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective randomized clinical trial of d-threo-methylphenidate HCl in brain tumor patients receiving radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(5):1496–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spelten ER, Sprangers MAG, Verbeek JHA. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. 2002;11(2):124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaleita TA, Wellisch DK, Cloughesy TF, Ford JM, Freeman D, Belin TR, et al. Prediction of neurocognitive outcome in adult brain tumor patients. J Neurooncol. 2004;67(1–2):245–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Calvio L, Feuerstein M, Hansen J, Luff GM. Cognitive limitations in occupationally active malignant brain tumour survivors. Occup Med (Lond). 2009;59(6):406–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cecelia Gzell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gzell, C., Wheeler, H., Guo, L. et al. Employment following chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma: a prospective case series. J Cancer Surviv 8, 108–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0311-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0311-9

Keywords

Navigation