Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging, imagining and representation: Muslim visual artists in NYC

  • Published:
Contemporary Islam Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is based on ethnographic fieldwork I conducted with Muslim visual artists in New York City. It assumes that art is a particular medium or media form that not only gives us insight into the processes of creative expression, but helps us understand the relationship between global media events and their localized practices. For Muslim visual artists, and Muslims in general, “9/11” has become a significant marker of time in thinking about issues of identity, belonging and representation. Even in the art worlds, the larger tropes of Islam/Muslims—terrorism, violence, veiling, patriarchy, the Middle East—become the normative frames and images within and against which Muslim artists do their work. I outline the ways Muslim artists as cultural producers are not only contesting art world boundaries in terms of new and emerging forms of identification, but also the various sites where they are being forged. Muslim artists explore new ways of thinking about being Muslim, not necessarily as a theological or aesthetic unity, but as a minority identification in the West/America. I focus on the work of two artists, Nigerian-born Fatimah Tuggar and Pakistani-born Shahzia Sikander.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Throughout my work, I use the artists’ real names since they are public figures and some even “celebrities” in the New York art worlds. The artists and their works are already found in many art and other publications and I see my own research as one more writing on their lives and works. In addition, since many of us have become friends, through the course of my research, the first name usage seems appropriate.

  2. I borrow and extend this expression from the title of chapter two in Geertz’s (1985) Local Knowledge, “Found in Translation: On the Social History of the Moral Imagination.”

  3. Professor of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University and one of the leading scholars of Islam in the United States.

  4. Michael Kimmelman, “Shahzia Sikander, Brent Sikkema,” The New York Times (New York), 7 February 2003, Sec. D: Fine Arts, 12.

  5. Laura Auricchio, Time Out New York, 23–30 January 2003.

  6. O, The Oprah Magazine, July 2001.

  7. After her initial training at the prestigious National College of Arts in Lahore, almost all of Shahzia’s schooling and professional life has been in the United States, first in Houston and then New York City, as well as Providence, where she graduated with an MFA from the Rhode Island School of Design in 1995.

  8. Shahzia’s work, Reinventing the Dislocation 1997, was selected as part of American Visionaries 2001 publication. It was also this same work that made the cover of one of Public Culture’s Millennial Quartet volumes, Alternative Modernities (2001), in which there are excerpts of Shahzia Sikander’s interview with Homi Bhabha. The interview was first published in the catalogue accompanying Shahzia’s exhibit at the Renaissance Society at the University of Chicago

  9. American Visionaries, The Whitney Museum of American Art Publications, (New York, 2001), 154.

  10. David Hunt, Bomb, summer 2001, 46.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (ed). (1996). Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickelman, D. F. & Anderson, J. W. (eds). (1999). New media in the Muslim world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1985). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, I. & Lavine, S. (1991). Exhibiting cultures: the poetics and politics of museum display. Washington: Smithsonian Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, B. (ed). (1996). Making Muslim space in North America and Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, F. (2002). Painting culture: the making of an aboriginal fine art. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. & Steiner, C. (eds). (1999). Unpacking culture: art and commodity in colonial and postcolonial worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, V. (1990). Constructing a sociology of the arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, V. (ed). (1997). Outsider art: contesting boundaries in contemporary culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Appadurai, A. (ed). (1986). The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1989). The transformation of the avant-garde: the New York art world, 1940–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1990). The ideology of the aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington, S. (1998). The death of authentic primitive art and other tales of progress. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiwa, M. (2004). Aestheticizing politics and politicizing aesthetics: visual artists and the production and representation of Muslim identities in the United States. Ph.D. Dissertation: Columbia University.

  • Karp, I., Kreamer, C., & Lavine, S. (1992). Museums and communities: the politics of public culture. Washington: Smithsonian Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G., & Myers, F. (eds). (1995). The traffic in culture: refiguring art and anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, F. (1991). Representing culture: the production of discourse(s) for aboriginal acrylic paintings. Cultural Anthropology, 6(1), 26–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. (1989). Primitive art in civilized places. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohat, E., & Stam, R. (1998). Narrativizing visual culture: towards a polycentric aesthetics. In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.), The visual culture reader (pp. 37–59). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, B. (ed). (1984). Art after modernism: rethinking representation. New York: Godine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegar, J. (2003). Claiming Egypt: the cultural politics of artistic practice in a Postcolonial Society. Ph.D. Dissertation: New York University.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my colleagues in the Muslims in New York City Project at Columbia University (2004) and especially Professor Lila Abu-Lughod for overseeing this research. Many thanks to the Ford Foundation for its generous funding that made this research possible. Thanks also to the colleagues in this volume, for the discussions and suggestions during and subsequent to our Muslims and Media workshop at Princeton University, May 2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munir Jiwa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiwa, M. Imaging, imagining and representation: Muslim visual artists in NYC. Cont Islam 4, 77–90 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-009-0102-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-009-0102-2

Keywords

Navigation