Skip to main content
Log in

Positive versus normative economics: what’s the connection? Evidence from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy and the General Social Survey

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research suggests that positive and normative beliefs about economics are largely unrelated. Using questions from two national surveys, this study finds that: (a) the underlying determinants of positive and normative beliefs are strikingly similar; (b) education is by far the strongest overall determinant of both positive and normative beliefs; and (c) the variables known to push positive beliefs in the same direction as formal economic training—education, male gender, income growth, and job security—also push normative beliefs in the same direction. These results strongly suggest that the positive-normative connection has been underestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, R., Kearl, J., & Vaughan, M. (1992). Is there a consensus among economists in the 1990’s? American Economic Review, 82(2), 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blendon, R., Benson, J., Brodie, M., Morin, R., Altman, D., Gitterman, D., Brossard, M., & James, M. (1997). Bridging the gap between the public’s and economists’ views of the economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 105–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A., & Krueger, A. (2004). What does the public know about economic policy, and how does It know it? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 327–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2001). What makes people think like economists? Evidence on economic cognition from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(2), 395–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2002a). Systematically biased beliefs about economics: robust evidence of judgemental anomalies from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Economic Journal, 112(479), 433–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2002b). Sociotropes, systematic bias, and political failure: reflections on the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Social Science Quarterly, 83(2), 416–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2006). How do voters form positive economic beliefs? Evidence from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. Public Choice, 128(3/4), 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B., & Miller, S. (2010). Economic beliefs, intelligence, and ability bias: evidence from the General Social Survey. Unpub ms. http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/iqbeliefej.doc.

  • Citrin, J., & Green, D. (1990). The self-interest motive in American public opinion. Research in Micropolitics, 3, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory. Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. (2005). Self-deception as the root of political failure. Public Choice, 124(3–4), 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, D. (1982). A discourse on semantic priming. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D., & Geide-Stevenson, D. (2003). Consensus among economists: revisited. Journal of Economic Education, 34(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. (1996). Economics, values, and health care reform. American Economic Review, 86(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V., Krueger, A., & Poterba, J. (1998). Economists’ views about parameters, values, and policies: survey results in labor and public economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1387–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Social Survey (2008). http://www.norc.org/GSS+Website/.

  • Glaeser, E., & Sunstein, C. (2009). Extremism and social learning. Journal of Legal Analysis, 1, 263–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1960). The way the world is. Review of Metaphysics, 14(1), 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. (2007). Educated preferences: explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61, 399–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1969). Rational-choice models of political behavior vs. functionalist and conformist theories. World Politics, 21(4), 513–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J., & Alwin, D. (1987). An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1977). Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (Ed.) (1990). Beyond self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2009). Economic bias and ideology: evidence from the General Social Survey. Journal of Private Enterprise, 25(1), 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, M., & Shoesmith, E. (1992). British economic opinion: positive science or normative judgment? American Economic Review, 82(2), 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D., & Funk, C. (1990). Self-interest in Americans’ political opinions. In J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 147–170). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D., Lau, R., Tyler, T., & Allen, H. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and Presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74(3), 670–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(7), 320–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington Post, Kaiser Family Foundation, Harvard University Survey Project (1996). Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy. October 16, #1199. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/1199-econgen.cfm.

  • Whaples, R. (2006). Do economists agree on anything? Yes! The Economists’ Voice, 3(9). http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol3/iss9/art1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen C. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caplan, B., Miller, S.C. Positive versus normative economics: what’s the connection? Evidence from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy and the General Social Survey . Public Choice 150, 241–261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9700-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9700-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation