Abstract
Although it is well-known that high soil strength is a constraint to root and shoot growth, it is not clear to what extent soil strength is the main physical stress that limits crop growth and yield. This is partly because it is difficult to separate the effects of soil drying and high soil strength, which tend to occur together. The aim of this paper is to test the hypothesis that for two different soil types, yield is closely related to soil strength irrespective of difference in soil water status and soil structure. Winter (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Hereward) and spring wheat (cv. Paragon) were grown in the field on two soils, which had very different physical characteristics. One was loamy sand and the other sandy clay loam; compaction and loosening treatments were applied in a fully factorial design to both. Crop growth and yield, carbon isotope discrimination, soil strength, water status, soil structure and hydraulic properties were measured. The results showed that irrespective of differences in soil type, structure and water status, soil strength gave a good prediction of crop yield. Comparison with previous data led to the conclusion that, irrespective of whether it was due to drying or compaction (poor soil management), soil strength appeared to be an important stress that limits crop productivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon (1979) Moisture measurement-forages. ASAE Standard: ASAE S358.1
Atwell BJ (1990) The effect of soil compaction on wheat during early tillering. I. Growth, development and root structure. New Phytol 115:29–35
Barraclough PB, Leigh RA (1984) The growth and activity of winter-wheat roots in the field—the effect of sowing date and soil type on root-growth of high-yielding crops. J Agric Sci 103:59–74
Blum A, Johnson JW, Ramseur EL, Tollner EW (1991) The effect of a drying topsoil and possible non-hydraulic signal on wheat growth and yield. J Exp Bot 42:1225–1231
Brasher BR, Franzmeier D, Valassis V (1966) Use of Saran resin to coat natural clods for bulk-density and water-retention measurements. Soil Sci 101:108–110
Dodd IC (2005) Root-to-shoot signalling: assessing the roles of ‘up’ in the up and down world of long-distance signalling in planta. Plant Soil 274:251–270
Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JD, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Phys 40:503–537
Foulkes MJ, Scott RK, Sylvester-Bradley R (2001) The ability of wheat cultivars to withstand drought in UK conditions: resource capture. J Agric Sci 137:1–16
Gowing DJG, Davies WJ, Jones HG (1990) A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Malus x domestica Borkh. J Exp Bot 41:1535–1540
Jensen CR, Mogensen VO, Poulsen HH, Henson IE, Aagot S, Hansen E, Ali M, Wollenweber B (1998) Soil water matric potential rather than water content determines drought responses in field-grown lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). Aust J Plant Physiol 25:353–363
Masle J (1988) Growth and stomatal responses of wheat seedlings to spatial and temporal variations in soil strength of bi-layered soils. J Exp Bot 49:1245–1257
Masle J, Farquhar GD (1988) Effects of soil strength on the relationship of water-use efficiency and growth to carbon isotope discrimination in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol 86:32–38
Masle J, Passioura JB (1987) The effect of soil strength on the growth of young wheat plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 14:643–656
Materechera SA, Dexter AR, Alston AM (1991) Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 135:31–41
Mooney SJ, Holden NM, Ward SM, Collins JF (1998) The rapid preparation of structural images from undisturbed, non-cohesive material (milled peat). Geoderma 86:159–168
Passioura JB (2002) Soil conditions and plant growth. Plant Cell Environ 25:311–318
Passioura JB (2007) The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. J Exp Bot 58:113–117
Richards RA (2000) Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. J Exp Bot 51:447–458
Sperry JS, Alder FR, Campbell GS, Comstock JP (1998) Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model. Plant Cell Envir 21:347–359
Taylor HM, Ratliff LF (1969) Root elongation rates of cotton and peanuts as a function of soil strength and soil water content. Soil Sci 108:113–119
Verslues PE, Ober ES, Sharp RE (1998) Root growth and oxygen relations at low water potentials. Impact of oxygen availability in polyethylene glycol solutions. Plant Physiol 116:1403–1412
Whalley WR, Cope RE, Nicholl CJ, Whitmore AP (2004) In-field calibration of a dielectric soil moisture meter designed for use in an access tube. Soil Use Manage 20:203–206
Whalley WR, Clark LJ, Gowing DJG, Cope RE, Lodge RJ, Leeds-Harrison PB (2006) Does soil strength play a role in wheat yield losses caused by soil drying? Plant Soil 280:279–290
Whalley WR, Clark LJ, Take WA, Bird NRA, Leech PK, Cope RE, Watts CW (2007a) A porous-matrix sensor to measure the matric potential of soil water in the field. Eur J Soil Sci 58:18–25
Whalley WR, To J, Kay BD, Whitmore AP (2007b) Prediction of the penetrometer resistance of agricultural soils with models with few parameters. Geoderma 137:370–377
Whiteley GM, Dexter AR (1983) Behaviour of roots in cracks between soil peds. Plant Soil 74:153–162
Young IM, Montagu K, Conroy J, Bengough AG (1997) Mechanical impedance of root growth directly reduces leaf elongation rates of cereals. New Phytol 135:613–619
Acknowledgements
Rothamsted Research is grant-aided by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. We thank Mr R. P. White for statistical advice, and Mr C. P. Webster, Mr A. Hunt and Mr R. E. Cope for help with the field experimentation. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Len Wade.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whalley, W.R., Watts, C.W., Gregory, A.S. et al. The effect of soil strength on the yield of wheat. Plant Soil 306, 237–247 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9577-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9577-5