Skip to main content
Log in

Dominant Heat Transfer Mechanisms in the GTAW Plasma Arc Column

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2D steady-state mathematical model of a GTAW electric arc was used to analyze the relative importance of the main heat transfer mechanisms that heat or cool the plasma in the arc column. The analysis consisted of building a map of the dominant mechanisms for heating and cooling the arc in each zone as well as their relative importance in terms of volumetric power. It was found that the primary inputs of energy are due to convection near the anode and Joule heating near the cathode, while the main cooling mechanisms have a complex structure that can be described in the map from cathode to anode, composed of Thomson effect, convection, radiation and conduction. A systematic analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of the arc current, arc length, and plasma gas on the map of dominant mechanisms. The gases considered were Ar and He. The main effect of current is on the intensities and extent of the zones of dominance of the mechanisms. The arc length does not significantly affect the map, and the type of gas influences most of the dominant heat transfer mechanisms. The heat transfer near the anode is governed by the momentum and thermal boundary layers due to the plasma jet, while the cathode heat transfer is dominated by the heat transfer mechanisms associated with current flow. The information provided may be used to perform simple energy balances in specific zones of the arc to gain basic understanding of the physics in the arc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramakrishnan S, Stokes AD, Lowke JJ (1978) An approximate model for high-current free-burning arcs. J Phys D Appl Phys 11:2267–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McKelliget J, Szekely J (1986) Heat transfer and fluid flow in the welding arc. Metall Mater Trans A 17A:1139–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldak J, Bibby M, Moore J, House R, Patel B (1986) Computer modeling of heat flow in welds. Metall Trans B 17B:587–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dilawari AH, Szekely J, Westhoff R (1990) An assessment of the heat and fluid flow phenome inside plasma torches in non-transferred arc systems. ISIJ Int 30:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowke JJ, Morrow R, Haidar J (1997) A simplified unified theory of arcs and their electrodes and their electrodes. J Phys D Appl Phys 30:2033–2042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka M, Terasaki H, Ushio M, Lowke JJ (2002) A unified numerical modelling of stationary tungsten-inert-gas welding process. Metall Mater Trans A 33A:2043–2052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nestor OH (1962) Heat intensity and current density distributions at the anode of high current, inert gas arcs. J Appl Phys 33(5):1638–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu KC, Etemadi K, Pfender E (1982) Study of the free-burning high-intensity argon arc. J Appl Phys 54:1293–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eagar TW (1989) An iconoclast’s view of the physics of welding—rethinking old ideas. In: David SA, Vitek JM (eds) 2nd international conference on trends in welding research, Gatlinburg, Tennessee. ASM International, Materials Park, pp 341–346

  10. Ramírez-Argáez MA, Trapaga G, McKelliget J (2004) A comparison between different numerical formulations for welding arc representations. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1634–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gleizes A, Gonzalez JJ, Freton P (2005) Thermal plasma modelling. J Phys D Appl Phys 38:153–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy AB, Tanaka M, Yamamoto K, Tashiro S (2009) Modelling of thermal plasmas for arc welding: the role of the shielding gas properties and of metal vapour. J Phys D Appl Phys 42(19):194006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy AB (2015) A perspective on arc welding research: the importance of the arc, unresolved questions and future directions. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 35:471–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lowke JJ, Morrow R, Haidar J (1997) A simplified unified theory of arcs and their electrodes. J Phys D Appl Phys 30(14):2033–2042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alireza JS, Choquet I (2016) A review of cathode-arc coupling modeling in GTAW. Weld Word 60:821–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baeva M (2017) Non-equilibrium modeling of tungsten-inert gas arcs. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 37:341–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy AB (2001) Thermal plasmas in gas mixtures. J Phys D Appl Phys 34(20):R151–R173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Terasaki H, Tanaka M, Ushio M (2002) Effects of metal vapor on electron temperature in helium gas tungsten arcs. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 33(4):1183–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen FF, Xiang J, Thomas DG, Murphy AB (2019) Model-based parameter optimization for arc welding process simulation. Appl Math Model 81:386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pichot F, Danis M, Lacoste E (2013) Numerical definition of an equivalent GTAW heat source. J Mater Process Technol 213(7):1241–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan JJ, Yang LJ, Hu SS (2017) Numerical analysis of keyhole formation and collapse in variable polarity plasma arc welding. Int J Heat Mass Transf 109:1218–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ai Y, Jiang P, Shao X (2017) A three-dimensional numerical simulation model for weld characteristics analysis in fiber laser keyhole welding. Int J Heat Mass Transf 108:614–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nezamdost MR, Esfahani MRN, Hasemi SH (2016) Invesitgation of temperature and residual stresses field of submerged arc welding by finite element methods and experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1–4):615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. García-García V, Camacho-Arriaga JC, Reyes-Calderón F (2016) A simplified elliptic paraboloid heat source model for autogeneous GTAW process. Int J Heat Mass Transf 100:536–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu K, Yang F, Wang S, Gao B, Xu C (2018) The research on the heat source characteristics and the equivalent heat source of the arc in gaps. Int J Heat Mass Transf 124:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schnick M, Hertel M, Fuessel U, Uhrlandt D (2013) Energy balance in MIG arcs. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:224002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramírez MA, Trapaga G, McKelliget J (2003) A comparison between two different numerical formulations of welding arc simulation. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 11(4):675–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy AB, Arundell CJ (1994) Transport coefficients of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, argon–nitrogen and argon–oxygen plasmas. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 14:451–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy AB (1997) Transport coefficients of helium and argon–helium plasmas. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 25:809–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cram LE (1985) Statistical evaluation of radiative power losses from thermal plasmas due to spectral lines. J Phys D Appl Phys 18:401–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cressault Y, Rouffet ME, Gleizes A, Meillot E (2010) Net emission of Ar–H2–He thermal plasmas at atmospheric pressure. J Phys D Appl Phys 43:335204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Delgado-Álvarez A, Mendez PF, Ramírez-Argáez MA (2019) Dimensionless representation of the column characteristics and weld pool interactions for a DC argon arc. Sci Technol Weld Join 24(7):634–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Delgado-Álvarez A et al (2021) Generalized representation of arc shape, arc column characteristics and arc-weld pool interactions for DC electric arcs burning in monoatomic gases. J Phys D Appl Phys 54(5):055001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this project was provided by Conacy, Project PAPIIT IN 115617. Insightful conversations with David Apaoblaza and Stefano Sacco from the U. of Chile are gratefully acknowledged. José Alfredo Delgado Álvarez is a Ph. D. student in the ‘Programa de Doctorado en Ingeniería Química’, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). He thanks CONACYT for receiving a doctoral fellowship (Grant Number CVU 446967).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco A. Ramírez-Argáez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velázquez-Sánchez, A., Delgado-Álvarez, A., Méndez, P.F. et al. Dominant Heat Transfer Mechanisms in the GTAW Plasma Arc Column. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 41, 1497–1515 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-021-10192-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-021-10192-5

Keywords

Navigation