Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Verbal Event Structure on Online Thematic Role Assignment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Event structure describes the relationships between general semantics (Aktionsart) of the verb and its syntactic properties, separating verbs into two classes: telic verbs, which denote change of state events with an inherent end-point or boundary (catch, rescue), and atelic, which refer to homogenous activities (tease, host). As telic verbs describe events, in which the internal argument (Patient) is affected, we hypothesized that processing of telic verb template would activate syntactic position of the Patient during sentence comprehension. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 20 English speakers, who read sentences with reduced Object relative clauses, in which the verb was either telic or atelic. ERPs in relative clauses diverged on the definite article preceding the Agent: the atelic condition was characterized by larger amplitude negativity at the N100. Such processing differences are explained by activation of the syntactic position for the Patient by the event structure template of telic verbs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astheimer L. B., Sanders L. D. (2009) Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing. Biological psychology 80(1): 23–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy J., Weinberg H. (1981) Brain potentials, perceptual mechanisms and semantic categorisation. Biological psychology 12(1): 43–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. (2009) The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 19–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornkessel I., McElree B., Schlesewsky M., Friederici A. D. (2004) Multi-dimensionsl contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrease structure from case marking. Journal of Memory and Language 51: 495–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M. (2006) The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113(4): 787–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C. M., Hagoort P., ter Keurs M. (1999) Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: Open- and closed-class words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11(3): 261–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman M., Carpenter P. A. (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 450–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikker S., Rabagliati H., Pylkkanen L. (2009) Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition 110(3): 293–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Ferretti R., Rohde H., Kehler A., Crutchley M. (2009) Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential processing. Journal of Memory and Language 61(2): 191–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann N., Taranto G., Shapiro L. P., Swinney D. (2008) The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 39(3): 355–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch S., Schlesewsky M. (2001) The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. NeuroReport 12(15): 3391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort P. (2003) Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(6): 883–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort P., Brown C. M. (2000) ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia 38(11): 1528–1530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort P., Hald L., Bastiaansen M. C. M., Petersson K. M. (2004) Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304(5669): 438–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammill D. D., Brown V. L., Larsen S. C., Wiederholt J. L. (1994) Test of adolescent and adult language. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff R. (1991) Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41(1–3): 9–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff R. (2007) A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research 1146: 2–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Just M. A., Carpenter P. A., Keller T. A., Eddy W. F., Thulborn K. R. (1996) Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 274(5284): 114–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaan E., Wijnen F., Swaab T. Y. (2004) Gapping: Electrophysiological evidence for immediate processing of “missing” verbs in sentence comprehension. Brain and Language 89(3): 584–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim A., Osterhout L. (2005) The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 52: 205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J. W., Kutas M. (1995) Who did what and when? Using word- and causal-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7(3): 376–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera H., Francis W.N. (1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperberg G. R., Kreher D. A., Sitnikova T., Caplan D. N., Holcomb P. J. (2007) The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language 100(3): 223–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperberg G. R., Sitnikova T., Caplan D., Holcomb P. J. (2003) Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17(1): 117–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M., Hillyard S. A. (1980) Reading sensless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207: 203–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M., Hillyard S. A. (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic associations. Nature 307: 161–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lai G., Mangels J. A. (2007) Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage. Neuropsychologia 45(9): 2038–2050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Lubar J. F., Mann C. A., Gross D. M., Shively M. S. (1992) Differences in semantic event-related potentials in learning-disabled, normal, and gifted children. Biofeedback Self Regul 17(1): 41–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald M. C. (1994) Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 157–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden C. J., Zwaan R. A. (2003) How does verb aspect constrain event representations?. Memory and Cognition 31: 663–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliano J. P., Schleich M. C. (2000) Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes 29: 83–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaia E., Wilbur R. B., Weber-Fox C. (2009) ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences. Brain and Language 108(3): 145–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munte T. F., Wieringa B. M., Weyerts H., Szentkuti A., Matzke M., Johannes S. (2001) Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: Class and frequency effects. Neuropsychologia 39(1): 91–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neville H. J., Mills D. L., Lawson D. S. (1992) Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cereb Cortex 2(3): 244–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neville H. J., Nicol J. L., Barss A., Forster K. I., Garrett M. F. (1991) Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(2): 151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Bryan, E. (2003). Event structure in language comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.

  • O’Bryan, E., Folli, R., Harley, H., & Bever, T. (submitted). Event structure affects on-line sentence comprehension.

  • Osterhout L., Holcomb P. J., Swinney D. A. (1994) Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 20: 786–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout L., Mobley L. A. (1995) Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 739–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramchand G. (2008) Verb meaning and the lexicon—the first-phase syntax. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Recchia G., Jones M. N. (2009) More data trumps smarter algorithms: comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods 41(3): 647–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segalowitz S. J., Zheng X. (2009) An ERP study of category priming: Evidence of early lexical semantic access. Biological Psychology 80(1): 122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson R., Crawley R., Kleinman D. (1994) Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 519–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson S., Merlo P. (1997) Lexical structure and parsing complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 12(2/3): 349–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streb J., Hennighausen E., Rosler F. (2004) Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33(3): 175–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tenny C. (1987) Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenny C. (1994) Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend D. J., Bever T. (2001) Sentence comprehention. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkum J. J., Koorneef A. W., Otten M., Nieuwland M. S. (2007) Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research 1146: 158–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Hout A. (2001) Event semantics in the lexicon-syntax interface. In: Tenny C., Pustejovsky J. (eds) Events as grammatical objects. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 239–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valin R. (2007) Some universals of verb semantics. In: Mairal R., Gil J. (eds) Linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wekerly J., Kutas M. (1999) An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 36(5): 559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada Y., Neville H. J. (2007) An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences. Brain Research 1130(1): 167–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evie Malaia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malaia, E., Wilbur, R.B. & Weber-Fox, C. Effects of Verbal Event Structure on Online Thematic Role Assignment. J Psycholinguist Res 41, 323–345 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9195-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9195-x

Keywords

Navigation