Skip to main content
Log in

Playing Patient, Playing Doctor: Munchausen Syndrome, Clinical S/M, and Ruptures of Medical Power

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article deploys sadomasochism as a framework for understanding medical practice on an institutional level. By examining the case of the factitious illness Munchausen syndrome, this article analyzes the operations of power in the doctor-patient relationship through the trope of role-playing. Because Munchausen syndrome causes a disruption to the dyadic relationship between physicians and patients, a lens of sadomasochism highlights dynamics of power in medical practice that are often obscured in everyday practice. Specifically, this article illustrates how classification and diagnosis are concrete manifestations of the mobilization of medical power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Heym, “The Imposter Patient,” 160.

  2. This observation comes from my review (Fisher 2002) of all the medical literature on Munchausen syndrome from 1951 (the year of the appearance of the original article) to 2000 (578 total publications).

  3. Chancer, Sadomasochism in Everyday Life, 2. Subsequent references to this work appear in the text.

  4. See, for example, RR Linden et al., Against Sadomasochism and M Thompson, Leatherfolk.

  5. Chancer is very careful to point out that sadomasochism is not inherently gendered. That is to say, she stresses that patriarchy has influenced the gendering of institutional hierarchies, not that essential differences between men and women have caused this division.

  6. Starr, The Social Transformation of American Medicine.

  7. Illich, Medical Nemesis, 22.

  8. Nash, “Problems of Deception,” 141.

  9. See B Good and M-JD Good, “Learning Medicine” and C Amirault, “Pseudologica Fantastica.”

  10. Young, Presence in the Flesh.

  11. See H Mandel and H Spiro, When Doctors Get Sick and EE Rosenbaum, A Taste of My Own Medicine.

  12. Schiebinger, Has Feminism Changed Science?

  13. Gramsci, Prison Notebooks.

  14. See both M Foucault, Discipline and Punish and The History of Sexuality: Volume I.

  15. Chancer uses the term “conditions” here to describe the responses from those in power to those challenging their authority.

  16. Hess, Evaluating Alternative Cancer Therapies.

  17. Hess, Selecting Technology, Science, and Medicine.

  18. Haddy, et al., “Munchausen's Syndrome,” 197.

  19. Fisher, Sociopatholigizing Patients.

  20. Asher, “Munchausen's Syndrome,” 339.

  21. See, for example, Haddy, et al.; DO Quest and SE Hyler, “Neurosurgical Munchausen's Syndrome”; DJ Vail, “Munchausen Returns.”

  22. Spiro, “Chronic Factitious Illness,” 574.

  23. See, for example, TP Duffy, “The Red Baron” and S Vaisrub, “Editorial: The Immortal Baron.”

  24. Kass, “Identification of Persons with Munchausen's Syndrome,” 197.

  25. Baudrilliard, Simulacra and Simulation, 3.

  26. MacKendrick, Counterpleasures.

  27. Quest and Hyler, 413.

  28. Hart, Between the Body and the Flesh.

  29. Sale and Kalucy, Munchausen's Syndrome, 525.

  30. Manolis and Sanjana, “Cardiopathia Fantastica,” 528.

  31. CA Pallis and AN Bamji, “McIlroy Was Here,” 973, 974, 975.

  32. AN Bamji and CA Pallis, “McIlroy, the Media, and the Macabre,” 641-2.

  33. Other examples of this detective work can be found in Le Coz et al. 1997 and in Asher 1951.

  34. Ilich, 117.

  35. GC Bowker and SL Star 1999.

  36. DJ Vail, “Munchausen Returns,” 320.

  37. Spiro, 577.

  38. Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital, 113.

  39. RW Moore and K Ullman, “The Doctor's Thorn,” 123.

  40. See E Frankel, “Munchausen's Syndrome”; JEH Stretton, “Munchausen's Syndrome”; B Williams, “Munchausen's Syndrome”; P Wingate, “Munchausen's Syndrome.”

  41. AM Karnik, et al., “A Unique Case,” 701.

  42. T Nadelson, “The Munchausen Spectrum,” 175.

  43. JO Cavenar and AA Maltbie, “Munchausen's Syndrome,” 349-50.

References

  • C. Amirault, “Pseudologica Fantastica and Other Tall Tales: The Contagious Literature of Munchausen Syndrome.” Literature and Medicine 14 (2) (1995): 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Asher, “Munchausen's Syndrome.” Lancet, 1 (1951): 339–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. N. Bamji, and C. A. Pallis, “McIlroy, the Media, and the Macabre.” British Medical Journal, 280 (1980): 641–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. C. Bowker, and S. L. Star,Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. “Weekly Clinicopathological Exercises: Case 28-1984.” New England Journal of Medicine, 311 (2) (1984): 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. O. Cavenar, and A. A. Maltbie, “Munchausen's Syndrome.” Military Medicine, 143, (1978): 349–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. S. Chancer, Sadomasochism in Everyday Life: The Dynamics of Power and Powerlessness (Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. P. Duffy, “The Red Baron.” New England Journal of Medicine, 327 (1992): 408–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Fisher, Sociopathologizing Patients: The Social Construction of Munchausen Syndrome (Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Random House, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Foucault, The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1 (New York: Random House, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Frankel, “Munchausen's Syndrome.” Lancet, 1 (1951): 911.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Good, and M. –J. D. Good, “Learning Medicine: The Constructing of Medical Knowledge at Harvard Medical School.'' In S. Lindenbaum & M. Lock (eds.), Knowledge, Power, and Practice (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Gramsci, Prison Notebooks (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. I. Haddy, R. M. Weber and A. S. Joglekar, “Munchausen's Syndrome.” American Family Physician, 27 (1983): 193–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Hart, Between the Body and the Flesh: Performing Sadomasochism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hess, Evaluating Alternative Cancer Therapies (New Brunswick: Rutgers, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hess, Selecting Technology, Science, and Medicine: Alternative Pathways in Globalization. Volume 1 (Niskayuna, NY: Letters & Sciences Publishing Co., 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Heym, “The Impostor Patient: Munchausen's Syndrome with Report of a Case.” Delaware Medical Journal, 45 (1973): 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Illich, Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health (New York: Pantheon Books, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Karnik, S. Farah, M. Khadadah, H. al−Duwaisan, and F. M. Denath, “A Unique Case of Munchausen's Syndrome.” British Journal of Clinical Practice, 44 (1990): 699–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. C. Kass, “Identification of Persons with Munchausen's Syndrome: Ethical Problems.” General Hospital Psychiatry, 7 (1985): 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. J. Le Coz, B. J. Cribier, N. Boehm, B. Schubert, E. Hied, and E. M. Grosshans, “Munchausen's Syndrome with Congenital Generalized Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex.” Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 77 (1997): 88–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. R. Linden, D. R. Pagano, D. E. H. Russell and S. L. Star, eds. Against Sadomasochism: A Radical Feminist Analysis (San Francisco: Frog in the Well, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. MacKendrick, Counterpleasures. Part of J. Natoli, (ed.), The SUNY Series in Postmodern Culture (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999).

  • H. Mandel, and H. Spiro. When Doctors Get Sick (New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Manolis, and V. M. Sanjana, “Cardiopathia Fantastica and Arteritis Factitia as Manifestations of Munchausen Syndrome.” Critical Care Medicine, 15 (1987): 526–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. W. Moore, and K. Ullman, “The Doctor's Thorn.” Medical Annals of the District of Columbia, 42 (1973): 121–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Nadelson, “The Munchausen Spectrum: Borderline Character Features.” General Hospital Psychiatry, 1 (1) (1979): 11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Naish, “Problems of Deception in Medical Practice.” Lancet, 2 (1979): 139–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Pallis, and A. N. Bamji, “McIlroy Was Here. Or Was He?” British Medical Journal, 1 (1979): 973–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. O. Quest, and S. E. Hyler, “Neurosurgical Münchausen's Syndrome: Case Report.” Neurosurgery 7 (1980): 412–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. E. Rosenbaum, A Taste of My Own Medicine: When the Doctor is the Patient (New York: Random House, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Sale, and R. Kalucy. “Munchausen's Syndrome.” Medical Journal of Australia, 2 (1978): 523-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Schiebinger, “Has Feminism Changed Science?” (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999).

  • H. R. Spiro, “Chronic Factitious Illness. Munchausen's Syndrome.” Archives of General Psychiatry, 18 (5) (1968): 569–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Starr, The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry (New York: Basic Books, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. H. Stretton, “Munchausen's Syndrome.” Lancet, 1 (1951): 474, 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Thompson, ed. Leatherfolk: Radical Sex, People, Politics, and Practice (Boston: Alyson Publications, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Vail, “Munchausen Returns.” Psychiatric Quarterly, 36 (1962): 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Vaisrub, “Editorial: The Immortal Baron.” The Journal of the American Medical Association, 230 (1) (1974): 90–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Williams, “Munchausen's Syndrome.” Lancet, 1 (1951): 527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Wingate, “Munchausen's Syndrome.” Lancet, 1 (1951): 412–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Young, Presence in the Flesh: The Body in Medicine (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill A. Fisher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, J.A. Playing Patient, Playing Doctor: Munchausen Syndrome, Clinical S/M, and Ruptures of Medical Power. J Med Humanit 27, 135–149 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-006-9014-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-006-9014-9

Keywords

Navigation