Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the Drinking Motivations of Social, High-Risk, and Extreme Drinkers on Game Day

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed the extent to which the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) correctly predicted college student’s motivation to consume alcohol on game day based on alcohol consumption rates. Three cohorts of 1,000 participants each (N = 3,000) were randomly selected and invited to complete an anonymous web-based survey the Monday following one of three designated college home football games. Path analyses were conducted to determine which of the TPB constructs were most effective in predicting Behavioral Intention and alcohol consumption among social, high-risk, and extreme drinkers. Social drinkers, high-risk, and those drinkers who engage in Extreme Ritualistic Alcohol Consumption (ERAC) were defined as males who consumed 1–4, 5–9, or 10 or more drinks on game day (1–3, 4–8, or nine or more drinks for females), respectively. Attitude Towards the Behavior and Subjective Norm constructs predicted participant’s intentions to consume alcohol and corresponding behavior among all three classifications of drinkers; whereas the Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) construct inconsistently predicted intention and alcohol consumption. Based on Behavioral Intention, the proportion of variance the TPB model explained decreased as participants alcohol consumption increased. It appears that the TPB constructs Attitude Toward the Behavior and Subjective Norm can effectively be utilized when designing universal prevention interventions targeting game day alcohol consumption among college students. However, the applicability of the PBC construct remains in question. While select constructs in the TPB appear to have predictive ability, the usefulness of the complete theoretical framework is limited when trying to predict high-risk drinking and ERAC. These findings suggest that other behavioral theories should be considered when addressing the needs of high-risk and extreme drinkers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2002). Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from four Harvard School of Public Health College alcohol study surveys: 1993–2001. Journal of American College Health, 50(5), 203–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coons, C. J., Howard-Hamilton, M., & Waryold, D. (1995). College sports and fan aggression: Implications for residence hall discipline. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Glassman, T., Werch, C., Jobli, E., & Bian, H. (2007). Alcohol-related fan behavior on college football game day. Journal of American College Health, 56(3), 255–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oster-Aaland, L. K., & Neighbors, C. (2007). The impact of a tailgating policy on students’ drinking behavior and perceptions. Journal of American College Health, 56(3), 281–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health and Human Services (2007). National Survey on Drug Use & Health. Retrieved September 17, 2008, from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k7NSDUH/2k7results.cfm#Ch3.

  6. Neighbors, C., Oster-Aaland, L., & Bergstrom, R. L. (2006). Event-and context-specific normative misperceptions and high-risk drinking: 21st birthday celebrations and football tailgating. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(2), 282–289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neal, J. N., & Fromme, K. (2007). Hook’em horns and heavy drinking: Alcohol use and collegiate sports. Addictive Behaviors, 32(11), 2681–2693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston, K. L., & White, K. M. (2204). Beliefs underlying binge-drinking in young female undergraduate students: A theory of planned behavior perspective. Youth Studies Australia, 23(2), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Callaghan, F., Chant, D., Callan, V., & Baglioni, A. (1997). Models of alcohol use by young adults: An examination of various attitude-behavior theories. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(5), 502–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Norman, P., Bennett, P., & Lewis, H. (1998). Understanding binge drinking among young people: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Health Education Research, 13(2), 163–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlegel, R. P., D’Avernas, J. R., Zanna, M. P., Decourville, N. H., & Manske, S. R. (1992). Problem drinking: A problem for the theory of reasoned action? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 358–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trafimow, D. (1996). The importance of attitudes in the prediction of college students’ intentions to drink. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2167–2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wall, A. M., Hinson, R. E., & McKee, S. A. (1998). Alcohol outcome expectancies, attitudes toward drinking and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59(4), 409–419.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (pp. 54–60). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reinecke, J., Schmidt, P., & Ajzen, I. (1996). Application of the theory of reasoned action to adolescents’ condom use: A panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 749–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glassman, T., Dodd, V., Sheu, J. J., Rienzo, B. A., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2008). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict alcohol consumption among college students on game day. The Journal of Global Drug Policy and Practice, 2(3), from http://www.globaldrugpolicy.org/2/3/4.php.

  18. Collins, S. E., & Carey, K. B. (2007). The theory of planned behvaior as a model of heavy episodic drinking among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(4), 498–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White, A. M., Kraus, C. L., & Swartzwelder, H. S. (2006). Many college freshmen drink at levels far beyond the binge threshold. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 30(6), 1006–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glassman, T., Dodd, V., Sheu, J. J., Rienzo, B. A., & Wagenaar, A. C. (under review) Extreme ritualistic alcohol consumption among college students on game day. Journal of American College Health.

  21. Core Institute at Southern Illinois University. (1994). Alcohol and drug survey long form. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.siu.edu/~coreinst/.

  22. Ajzen, I. (2002–Revised January 2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved April 12, 2009, from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.

  23. Mertler, C., & Vannatta, R. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed., p. 201). Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (pp. 48–50). NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research applications to practice (2nd ed., pp. 494–495). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by grant #Q184H060086 from the U.S. Department of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Education and Rehabilitative Services, University of Toledo, Mail Stop #119, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA

    Tavis Glassman & Robert E. Braun

  2. Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7500, USA

    Virginia Dodd

  3. Alpha Point05, Inc, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7500, USA

    Jeffrey M. Miller

  4. Student Health Care Center, University of Florida, 1 Fletcher Drive, Room 302, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7500, USA

    E. Maureen Miller

Authors
  1. Tavis Glassman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert E. Braun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Virginia Dodd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffrey M. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. Maureen Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tavis Glassman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glassman, T., Braun, R.E., Dodd, V. et al. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the Drinking Motivations of Social, High-Risk, and Extreme Drinkers on Game Day. J Community Health 35, 172–181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-009-9205-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-009-9205-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation