Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An application of Hebbian learning in the design process decision-making

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of a product involves a process in which several different aspects are combined in order to obtain a final, suitable and optimum product. Designers must interact with different stakeholder groups, make decisions and complete the design process. In order to achieve this, different evaluation techniques are used. Depending on the chosen technique and on the field and environment in which each member of the design team was trained, each one of the members will consider one or several aspects of the design project but from a point of view or perspective in line with his/her particular professional background. As a result, all decisions which will affect the design process of the product are focused on these aspects and individual viewpoints. In this paper, an evaluation technique is proposed which allows one to take suitable decisions, taking into account all the factors and perspectives which affect the design process in the best way, searching for a balance among them in relation to the aims and interests of a specific design project. The development of this evaluation technique was inspired by the way in which neurons interact with one another in the brain and it has been based on the Hebbian learning rule for neural networks. Lastly, a real application of the proposed technique is presented to demonstrate its applicability in evaluating industrial designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreasen, M. M., Kahler, S., & Lund, T. (1988). Design for assembly. Bedford: IFS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B. (2000). A toolkit for decision-based design theory. Engineering Valuation & Cost Analysis, special edition on “Decision-Based Design: Status & Promise”, 3(2/3), 85–106.

  • Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., & Knight, W. (2002). Product design for manufacture and assembly. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, G. A. (2001). A neural network model for the handling time of design for assembly. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 19(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, C.-F., Kim, K. H., Liu, B., & Gen, M. (2012). Advanced decision and intelligence technologies for manufacturing and logistics. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), 2133–2135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, F. S., Allen, J. K. & Mistree, F. (1999). Modeling perspectives with living systems theory in the design of complex engineering systems. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference of the international society for the systems sciences, 27 June–2 July 1999 Pacific Grove, CA Paper No. 99037.

  • Cowan, F. S., Allen, J. K., & Mistree, F. (2006). Functional modelling in engineering design: A perspectival approach featuring living systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(3), 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, S. M. (1991). Elicitation of requirements from multiple perspectives. Thesis (PhD). Imperial College, University of London.

  • Easterbrook, S. M. (1994). Resolving requirements conflicts with computer-supported negotiation. In M. Jirotka & J. Goguen (Eds.), Requirements engineering: Social and technical issues (pp. 41–65). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin, S. (1999). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelrigg, G. (1998). A framework for decision-based engineering design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), 653–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (2002). The organization of behaviour: A neuropsychological theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R., & Barnes, C. (2010). Towards an integrated approach to “Design for X”: An agenda for decision-based DFX research. Research in Engineering Design, 21, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 79, 2554–2558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 81, 3088–3092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J. J., & Tank, D. W. (1985). “Neural” computation of decisions of optimization problems. Biological Cybernetics, 52, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G. Q. (1996). Design for X: Concurrent engineering imperatives. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. H., & Zhang, H.-C. (1994). Artificial neural networks in manufacturing: Concepts, applications, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology-Part A, 17(2), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilachinski, A. (2001). Cellular automata: A discrete universe. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Pub. Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kristianto, Y., Gunasekaran, A., Helo, P., & Sandhu, M. (2012). A decision support system for integrating manufacturing and product design into the reconfiguration of the supply chain networks. Decision Support Systems, 52(4), 790–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutschenreiter-Praszkiewicz, I. (2013). Application of neural network in QFD matrix. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(2), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, H.-H., Lin, Y.-C., & Yeh, C.-H. (2005). Form design of product image using grey relational analysis and neural network models. Computers and Operations Research, 32(10), 2689–2711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P. K., Chin, K. S., & Pun, K. F. (2007). Managing conflict in collaborative new product development: A supplier perspective. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(9), 891–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. E., Chen, W., & Schmidt, L. (Eds.). (2007). Decision making in engineering design. New York: ASME Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, M., & Zolfaghari, S. (1999). Machine cell formation considering processing times and machine capacities: An ortho-synapse Hopfield neural network approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 10(5), 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. F., Sun, Y., Veera, C. S., Kyova, Y., & Noguchi, K. (2006). Priority assessment of software process requirements from multiple perspectives. Journal of Systems and Software, 79(11), 1649–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malavé, C. O., & Ramachandran, S. (1991). Neural network-based design of cellular manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2(5), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, M., Allen, J., & Mistree, F. (2000). The decision support problem technique: Integrating descriptive and normative approaches in decision based design. Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis, 3(2), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, S. (1993). Quantum neurons and their fluctuation. In IEEE/INNS international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN’93) (pp. 1610–1613).

  • Matsuda, S., (1999). Theoretical analysis of quantized Hopfield networks for integer programming. In IEEE/INNS international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN’99) (pp. 568–571).

  • McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in neurons activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming, X. G., & Mak, K. L. (2000). Intelligent setup planning in manufacturing by neural networks based approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11(3), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistree, F. & Allen, J. K. (1997). Optimization in decision-based design. In Position paper: Open workshop on decision-based design. Orlando, FL.

  • Nevins, J. L., & Whitney, D. E. (1989). Concurrent design of products and processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum computation and quantum information: 10th Anniversary edition hardcover. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Robbins, S. P. (1989). Organizational behaviour: Concepts, controversies, and applications (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, M., Perttula, M. (2005). Utilization of concept selection methods—a survey of Finnish industry. In ASME international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference. Long Beach, CA.

  • Soleymanpour, M., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2002). A transiently chaotic neural network approach to the design of cellular manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 40(10), 2225–2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Palaniswami, M., & Krishnamoorthy, M. (1996). A hybrid neural approach to combinatorial optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 23(6), 597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J., & Li, F. (2007). Research of product styling design method based on neural network. In IEEE third international conference on natural computation (ICNC 2007) (Vol. 2, pp. 499–504).

  • Taha, Z., & Rostam, S. (2012). A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), 2137–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G. (1992). The mechanical design process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kesteren, I., Kandachar, P., & Stappers, P. J. (2007). Activities in selecting materials from the perspective of product designers. International Journal of Design Engineering, 1(1), 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kesteren, I., de Bruijn, A., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Evaluation of materials selection activities in user-centred design projects. Journal of Engineering Design, 19(5), 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, R., Mulet, E., & Gómez-Senent, E. (2004). Effectiveness of the means of expression in creative problem-solving in design groups. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(3), 1466–1837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, A. A., Hinde, C. J., Messom, C. H., Harrison, R., & Williams, D. J. (2000). Design issues associated with neural network systems applied within the electronics manufacturing domain. Journal of Electronics Manufacturing, 10(1), 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha, X. F. (2005). Soft computing in engineering design: A hybrid dual cross-mapping neural network model. Neural Computing & Applications, 14(3), 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Industrial Engineering, University of Vigo, c/Maxwell s/n, Vigo, 36310, Spain

    Alberto Comesaña-Campos & José Benito Bouza-Rodríguez

Authors
  1. Alberto Comesaña-Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Benito Bouza-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Comesaña-Campos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Comesaña-Campos, A., Bouza-Rodríguez, J.B. An application of Hebbian learning in the design process decision-making. J Intell Manuf 27, 487–506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0881-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0881-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation