Abstract
This article explores international governance issues related to a possible future use of geoengineering techniques. Despite the serious arguments against geoengineering, policy-makers may start to take an interest in it in the medium term. The article identifies non-technical characteristics of geoengineering which might influence governance models, and then discusses three broad approaches: through the United Nations, by one state unilaterally, and through a consortium of states. An examination of international legal instruments reveals none that would pose an insuperable barrier to geoengineering. Finally, the article argues for early exploration of the technological, environmental, political and regulatory issues raised by geoengineering, to maximize the chances of good, science-based multilateral decision making if and when geoengineering’s day arrives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel R (2006) Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange pont (L1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(46):17184–17189
Barrett S (2003) Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Bengtsson L (2006) Geo-Engineering to confine climate change: is it at all feasible? Clim Change 77:229–234
Bodansky D (1996) May we engineer the climate? Clim Change 33:309–321
Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (2003) Charter for the carbon sequestration leadership forum: a carbon capture and storage technology initiative. Available at www.cslforum.org. Signed 25 June 2003.
Chayes A, Chayes AH (1993) On compliance. Int Organ 47–42:175–206
Cicerone RJ (2006) Geoengineering: encouraging research and overseeing implementation. Clim Change 77:221–226
Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma. Clim Change 77:211–220
The Economist (2008) A changing climate of opinion. The Economist, 6 September 2008
Govindasamy B, Caldiera K, Duffy PB (2002) Geoengineering earth’s radiation balance to mitigate climate change from a quadrupling of CO2. Glob Planet Change 37:157–168
Hass PM (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46:1–35 Winter 1992
IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. International Panel on Climate Change
IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for policy-makers. (Working group 2 contribution to the fourth assessment report.) International Panel on Climate Change
IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Summary for policy-makers. (Working group 3 contribution to the fourth assessment report.) International Panel on Climate Change
Jamieson D (1996) Ethics and intentional climate change. Clim Change 33:323–336
Keith DW (2000) Geoengineering the climate: history and prospect. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25:245–284
Keohane RO (1984) After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Lawrence MG (2006) Geoengineering: to speak or not to speak? Clim Change 77:245–248
Levy MA, Haas PM, Keohane RO (1992) Institutions for the Earth: promoting international environmental protection. Environment 34:12–17
Lovelock J (2006) The revenge of Gaia. Allen Lane, London/New York
Lunt DJ, Ridgwell A, Valdes PJ, Seale A (2008) “Sunshade world”: a fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12710
MacCracken MC (2006) Geoengineering: worthy of cautious evaluation? Clim Change 77:235–243
Merrill TW (1997) Golden rules for transboundary pollution. Duke Law J 46:932–934, 958–967
Michaelson J (1998) Geoengineering: a climate change Manhattan project. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, Stanford CA, January 1998
Schelling TC (1996) The economic diplomacy of geoengineering. Clim Change 33:303–307
Schelling TC (2005) An astonishing sixty years: the legacy of Hiroshima. Nobel Prize Lecture, 8 December 2005
Schneider SH (1996) Geoengineering: could—or should—we do it? Clim Change 33:291–302
Schneider SH (2001) Earth systems engineering and management. Nature 409:417–421
Schweickart RL (2003) The need for a United Nations asteroid deflection treaty to establish a system for trustworthy mission design and execution. B612 Foundation Occasional Paper 0301. Houston, Texas
Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. HM Treasury, London
Teller E, Hyde R, Ishikawa M, Nuckolls J, Wood L (2004) Active climate stabilization: presently-feasible albedo-control approaches to prevention of both types of climate change (presentation to a symposium held in Cambridge, England on 7–9 January 2004)
Thompson A (2006) Management under anarchy: the international politics of climate change. Clim Change 78:11, 7–29
Tilmes S, Muller R, Salawitch R (2008) The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes. Science 320:1201–1204
Weiss C (2006) Can there be science-based precaution? Environ Res Lett, 30 October 2006
Wigley TM (2006) A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science 314:452–454
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Virgoe, J. International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change. Climatic Change 95, 103–119 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9523-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9523-9