Abstract
This article interrogates the relationship between the human and non-human in Ursula Le Guin’s Earthsea texts. Arguing that children’s literature, and ecocritical treatment of that literature, inherits a vocabulary of ‘nature’ from literary and philosophical Romanticism, it suggests that, as conceived in this discourse, ‘nature’ emerges as a problematic category. Le Guin’s writing is shown to participate in a tradition of children’s literature that engineers a separation between and alienation of the non-human and human, which it then proceeds to negotiate. Offering readings of the dragons and episodes of metamorphosis in Le Guin’s Earthsea texts, I argue that Le Guin’s writing gestures towards a reconciliation of the human and the non-human. This remediation, described as Romantic, is basically ideological and incomplete as the texts ultimately re-inscribe this distinction. Dragons function in the texts as a synecdoche for the entire plenum of non-human animals, serving as a foil against which the human defines itself. ‘Like and unlike men’, the ambiguous animality of the dragons is a site of anxiety in the Earthsea texts and not an opportunity for a Romantic reparation of the human/non-human division. Further, acts of metamorphosis in the Earthsea texts suggest a contiguity of human and non-human. However, I demonstrate that the narrative structure of Le Guin’s texts co-opt and contain the worrying dissolution of the human/nature boundary. The ‘Anthropocene’, a term coined to designate the new, human-dominated geological epoch we now inhabit, is invoked to work through the tension which animates Le Guin’s writing. This concept is used to exert pressure on received methodologies of reading ‘nature’ in children’s literature and in Le Guin’s own critical work.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Jacqueline Rose, taking J.M. Barrie’s Peter Pan as metonymic of children’s fiction as a genre, writes that ‘[Peter Pan] gives us the child, but it does not speak to the child. In fact so rarely has it spoken to the child throughout its history, that it led me to ask whether there might not be some relation between this all-too-perfect presence of the child and a set of problems, or evasions, in the very concept of children’s literature itself. Children’s fiction rests on the idea that there is a child who is simply there to be addressed and that speaking to it might be simple (1993,1; emphasis in the original).
The tale of The Woman of Kemay is repeated in The Other Wind, pages 101 and 125 (2003).
References
Allen, Jude. 2013. ‘A Search for the Metamorphic Text: Human Animal Transformation in Twentieth Century Literature.’ PhD dissertation, Bath Spa University.
Altman, Peter S. 1976. Ursula K. Le Guin: Damsel with a Dulcimer. In Joseph Olander and Martin Harry Greenberg (Eds.), Ursula K. Le Guin (pp. 64–77). Edinburgh: Paul Harris Publishing.
Baldick, Chris. 2001. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bernardo, Susan M. and Graham J. Murphy. 2006. Ursula K. Le Guin: A Critical Companion. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Bradford, Clare, Kerry Mallan, John Stephens, Robyn McCallum. 2008. New World Orders in Contemporary Children’s Literature: Utopian Transformations.
Buse, Katherine. 2013. Genre, Utopia and Ecological Crisis: World-Multiplication in Le Guin’s Fantasy. Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism17(3), pp. 264–289.
Carson, Rachel. 2000/1962. Silent Spring. London: Penguin.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry, 35, pp.197–222.
Clark, Timothy. 2011. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, Bruce. 1995. Allegories of Writing: The Subject of Metamorphosis. New York: SUNY Press.
Colebrook, Claire. 2012. Not Symbiosis, Not Now: Why Anthropogenic Climate Change is Not Really Human. The Oxford Literary Review, 34(2), pp.185–211.
Crutzen, Paul J. 2002. Geology of Mankind. Nature 415(3). Accessed April 4 2022 from https://www.nature.com/articles/415023a.
Culler, Jonathan. 1981. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. London: Routledge
Curry, Alice. 2013. Environmental Crisis in Young Adult Fiction: A Poetics of Earth. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Gooding, Richard. 2011. Clockwork: Philip Pullman’s Posthuman Fairy Tale. Children’s Literature in Education 42.
Hunt, Peter and Lenz, Millicent. 2003. Alternative Worlds in Fantasy Fiction. London: Continuum.
Latour, Bruno. 2014. Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History 45(1), pp.1–18.
Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Polity.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1964(a). The Word of Unbinding. Fantastic: Stories of Imagination 13(1), pp. 66–114.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1964(b). The Rule of Names. Fantastic: Stories of Imagination 13(4), pp. 79–88.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1973. The Farthest Shore. London: Victor Gollancz.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1989. Science Fiction and Mrs Brown. In Susan Wood (Ed.), The Language of the Night: Essays on Science Fiction and Fantasy (pp. 86–103). London: The Women’s Press.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1994/1968. A Wizard of Earthsea. London: Puffin.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 1992/1990. Tehanu. London: Puffin.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 2003/2001. The Other Wind. London: Orion.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 2003 (a). Tales from Earthsea. London: Orion.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 2009. Cheek by Jowl: Talks and Essays on How and Why Fantasy Matters. Seattle: Aqueduct.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 2014. Lecture presented at ‘Anthropocene: Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet’, University of California, Santa Cruz. Accessed 22 September 2021 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BW8YmRAoW4.
Lippit, Akira Mizuta. 2000. Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Morton, Timothy. 2009. Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Myers, K. Sara. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Olmsted, Wendy. 1996. On the Margins of Otherness. Metamorphosis and Identity in Homer, Ovid, Sidney and Milton. New Literary History27(2), pp.167–184.
Payne, Tonia L. 2007. Dark Brothers and Shadow Souls: Ursula K. Le Guin’s Animal Fables. In Dave Aftandilian, Marion W. Copeland and David Scofield Wison (Eds.), What are the Animals to Us? Approaches from Science, Religion, Folklore, Literature and Art (pp. 169–179). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Rose, Jacqueline. 1993. The Case of Peter Pan or, The Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Shippey, T.A. 1977. The Magic Art and the Evolution of Words: Ursula Le Guin’s Earthsea Trilogy. Mosaic 10, pp.148–163.
Stephens, John. 2010. Impartiality and Attachment: Ethics and Ecopoeisis in Children’s Narrative Texts. International Research in Children’s Literature 3(2), pp. 205–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doherty, P. Reading children’s literature in the Anthropocene: the representation of ‘nature’ in Ursula K. Le Guin’s Earthsea fiction. Child Lit Educ 55, 248–262 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-022-09490-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-022-09490-z