Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Breast Size and Areolar Pigmentation in Perceptions of Women’s Sexual Attractiveness, Reproductive Health, Sexual Maturity, Maternal Nurturing Abilities, and Age

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women’s breast morphology is thought to have evolved via sexual selection as a signal of maturity, health, and fecundity. While research demonstrates that breast morphology is important in men’s judgments of women’s attractiveness, it remains to be determined how perceptions might differ when considering a larger suite of mate relevant attributes. Here, we tested how variation in breast size and areolar pigmentation affected perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Participants (100 men; 100 women) rated images of female torsos modeled to vary in breast size (very small, small, medium, and large) and areolar pigmentation (light, medium, and dark) for each of the five attributes listed above. Sexual attractiveness ratings increased linearly with breast size, but large breasts were not judged to be significantly more attractive than medium-sized breasts. Small and medium-sized breasts were rated as most attractive if they included light or medium colored areolae, whereas large breasts were more attractive if they had medium or dark areolae. Ratings for perceived age, sexual maturity, and nurturing ability also increased with breast size. Darkening the areolae reduced ratings of the reproductive health of medium and small breasts, whereas it increased ratings for large breasts. There were no significant sex differences in ratings of any of the perceptual measures. These results demonstrate that breast size and areolar pigmentation interact to determine ratings for a suite of sociosexual attributes, each of which may be relevant to mate choice in men and intra-sexual competition in women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A. (1983). The reproductive role of the human breast. Current Anthropology, 24, 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L. (1988). Breasts, hips and buttocks revisited. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L., Crawford, C. B., Nadeau, J., & Lindberg, T. (1992). Was the Duchess of Windsor right? Across-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biro, F. M., Falkner, F., Khoury, P., Morrison, J., & Lucky, A. (1992). Areolar and breast staging in adolescent girls. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 5, 271–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broer, P. N., Juran, S., Walker, M. E., Ng, R., Weichman, K., Tanna, N., et al. (2014). Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Annals of Plastic Surgery. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. P., Ringrose, C., Hyland, R. E., Cole, A. A., & Brotherston, T. M. (1999). A method for assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 52, 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, C. T., & Munteanu, A. R. (2012). Preferred female body proportions among child-free men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1431–1437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cant, J. G. H. (1981). Hypothesis for the evolution of human breasts and buttocks. American Naturalist, 117, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T. M. (1987). Human breasts: Unsupported hypotheses reviewed. Human Evolution, 2, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T. M., & Sellen, D. W. (1990). The reproductive advantages of fat in women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (2008). Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: Trade-offs between androgen and estrogen-dependent traits. Current Anthropology, 49, 1099–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, P. L., Hancock, P. J., Kiviniemi, V., George, H. R., & Tovée, M. J. (2009). Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, N., Haynes, J., Brennan, J., Neild, T., Goddard, C., Dearman, B., et al. (2005). Nipple areolar pigmentation: Histology and potential for reconstitution in breast reconstruction. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 58, 202–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Watching the hourglass. Human Nature, 21, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011a). Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 43–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011b). Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for female breast size and areolar pigmentation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 51–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Ormsby, D. K., & Dixson, A. F. (2014). Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Vasey, P. L., Sagata, K., Sibanda, N., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011c). Men’s preferences for women’s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1271–1279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, S., Soussignan, R., Sagot, P., & Schaal, B. (2009). The secretion of areolar (Montgomery’s) glands from lactating women elicits selective, unconditional responses in neonates. PLoS ONE, 4(10), e7579.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. F., & Pazhoohi, F. (2012). Natural and augmented breasts: Is what is not natural most attractive? Human Ethology Bulletin, 27, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. L., & Slather, M. L. (2002). Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 584–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., Langevin, R., & Zajac, Y. (1974). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males: A second experiment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 177–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Dias, M., & McClelland, A. (1998). The role of body weight, waist-to hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 34, 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2007). Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G. (1982). Permanent breast enlargement in human females: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garn, S. M., & French, N. Y. (1963). Post-partum and age changes in areolar pigmentation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 85, 873–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garn, S. M., Selby, S., & Crawford, M. R. (1956). Skin reflectance studies in children and adults. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 14, 101–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A., Ronzal, G., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & I. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in visual cognition I: Facial attractiveness (pp. 91–125). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78, 385–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, M. J., & Nduka, C. (2012). Challenges in obtaining aesthetic breast ideals: Reply to ‘Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions-Analysis of the ideal breast’. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 65, 1277–1278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 21–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2013). The ‘one animal in all creation about which man knows the least’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368, 20130072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janif, Z. J., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. (2014). Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair. Biology Letters, 10, 20130958.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janif, Z. J., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). Are preferences for women’s hair color frequency-dependent? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1, 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasieñska, G. (2009). Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 524–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasieñska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1213–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection. Ann Arbor, MI: Museum of Anthropology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2007). Menarche is related to fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 133, 1147–1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2008). Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 322–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, S. A., & Barnes, E. (1974). Letter to the Editor. American Naturalist, 108, 577–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. J. (2006). The breast/nipple/areola complex and human sexuality. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., & Meston, C. (2006). Nipple/breast stimulation and sexual arousal in young men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 3, 450–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linzell, J. L. (1959). Physiology of the mammary glands. Physiological Reviews, 39, 534–576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (1996). Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction, 11, 2090–2096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2014). Sex differences in attraction to familiar and unfamiliar opposite sex faces: Men prefer novelty and women prefer familiarity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 973–981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. S., Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1987). Human hips, breasts and buttocks: Is fat deceptive? Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallucci, P., & Branford, O. A. (2012). Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: Analysis of the ideal breast. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 65, 8–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature, 9, 263–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. A., & Tanner, J. M. (1969). Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 44, 291–303.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mascia-Lees, F. E., Relethford, J. H., & Sorger, T. (1986). Evolutionary perspectives on permanent breast enlargement in human females. American Anthropologist, 88, 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, W., & Macpherson, E. E. (1974). Some neglected aspects of the anatomy of the breasts. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 63, 10–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morán, C., Hernández, E., Ruíz, J. E., Fonseca, M. E., Bermúdez, J. A., & Zárate, A. (1999). Upper body obesity and hyperinsulinemia are associated with anovulation. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 47, 1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muzaffar, F., Hussain, I., & Haroon, T. S. (1998). Physiologic skin changes during pregnancy: A study of 140 cases. International Journal of Dermatology, 37, 429–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niefert, M. R., Seacat, J. M., & Jobe, W. E. (1985). Lactation failure due to insufficient glandular development of the breast. Pediatrics, 76, 823–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B. (1999). Permanent breasts as a side effect of subcutaneous fat tissue increase in human evolution. Homo, 50, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B. (2001). The evolution of gluteal/femoral fat deposits and balance during pregnancy in bipedal Homo. Current Anthropology, 42, 572–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B., & Grabarczyk, M. (2003). Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 144–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, I. G., & Petrakis, N. L. (1975). Comparison of breast pigmentation among women of different racial groups. Human Biology, 47, 441–450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pond, C. (1997). The biological origins of adipose tissue in humans. In M. E. Morbeck, A. Galloway, & A. L. Zihlman (Eds.), The evolving female: A life history perspective (pp. 147–162). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl, L., & Gründl, M. (2011). Males prefer a larger bust size in women than females themselves: An experimental study on female bodily attractiveness with varying weight, bust size, waist width, hip width, and leg length independently. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 35, 693–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, R. V. (1980). The origins of human sexuality. In C. R. Austin & R. V. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals (Vol. 8, pp. 1–33). Human sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simblet, S. (2001). Anatomy for the artist. New York: DK Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T. S., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist-hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. W. (1986). Psychology and evolution of breasts [Letter to the Editor]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1, 285–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltanian, H. T., Liu, M. T., Cash, A. D., & Iglesias, R. A. (2012). Determinants of breast appearance and aging in identical twins. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 32, 846–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013a). Resource security impacts men’s female breast size preferences. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57623.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013b). Men’s oppressive beliefs predict their breast size preferences in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1199–1207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J. M. (1962). Growth at adolescence (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J. M. (1978). Fetus into man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hooff, M. H. A., Voorhorst, F. J., Kaptein, M. B. H., Hirasing, R. A., Koppenaal, C., & Schoemaker, J. (2000). Insulin, androgen, and gonadotropin concentrations, body mass index, and waist to hip ratio in the first years after menarche in girls with regular menstrual cycles, irregular menstrual cycles, or oligomenorrhea. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 85, 1394–1400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandeweyer, E., & Hertens, D. (2002). Quantification of glands and fat in breast tissue: An experimental determination. Annals of Anatomy, 184, 181–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. C. K. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Practice and Research Endocrinology and Metabolism, 21, 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazniewicz, A. M., & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1129–1135.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Barnaby J. Dixson

  2. School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Melanie Duncan & Alan F. Dixson

  3. Statistics New Zealand, Statistics House, Wellington, New Zealand

    Melanie Duncan

Authors
  1. Barnaby J. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melanie Duncan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alan F. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barnaby J. Dixson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixson, B.J., Duncan, M. & Dixson, A.F. The Role of Breast Size and Areolar Pigmentation in Perceptions of Women’s Sexual Attractiveness, Reproductive Health, Sexual Maturity, Maternal Nurturing Abilities, and Age. Arch Sex Behav 44, 1685–1695 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0516-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0516-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation