Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Coercion Victimization and Perpetration in Heterosexual Couples: A Dyadic Investigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual coercion (SC), or making another person engage in sexual activity despite his or her unwillingness to do so, has been shown to have negative consequences for victims, namely depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and a negative view of one’s sexual self. The goals of the present study were to investigate the rate of SC victimization and perpetration, inter-partner agreement concerning its occurrence, in addition to its degree of reciprocity within a sample of 222 heterosexual couples. SC within previous romantic relationships was also examined. Results showed that less than 30% of couples agreed on the occurrence of sexual coercion within their ongoing relationship. Moreover, dyadic responses rather than individual responses provided a more accurate estimation of the frequency of SC. Over one in two couples reported experiencing some SC. More specifically, 45% of couples reported female victimization, 30% reported male victimization, and 20% reported reciprocal SC. Conversely, both men and women reported more SC victimization within previous relationships than in their current one. Findings suggest that SC is a common, pervasive problem within couples and that it is underreported by both victims and perpetrators, regardless of gender. Consequently, more systematic research, prevention and intervention efforts are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, A., Parkhill, M. R., & Koss, M. P. (2005). The effects of frame of reference on responses to questions about sexual assault victimization and perpetration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. B., & Sorensen, W. (1999). Male and female differences in reports of women’s heterosexual initiation and aggression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 243–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga, X. B. (2002). Joking violence among highly committed individuals. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, K. C. (2002). Prevalence of wife rape and other intimate partner sexual coercion in a nationally representative sample of women. Violence and Victims, 17, 511–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caetano, R., Schafer, J., Field, C., & Nelson, S. M. (2002). Agreement on reports of intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1308–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S., Madura, M., & Weaver, L. (1998). Premarital sexual aggressors: A multivariate analysis of social, relational, and individual variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Visser, R. O., Rissel, C. E., Richters, J., & Smith, A. M. A. (2007). The impact of sexual coercion on psychological, physical, and sexual well-being in a representative sample of Australian women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 676–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa. I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, S. L. (2005). Measuring gender differences in partner violence: Implications from research on other forms of violent and socially undesirable behavior. Sex Roles, 52, 725–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harney, P. A., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1991). Rape. In E. Grauerholz & M. A. Koralewski (Eds.), Sexual coercion: A sourcebook on its nature, causes, and prevention (pp. 3–15). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, C., Desmarais, S., & Hennig, K. (2007). Characteristics of male and female victims of sexual coercion. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2005). Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Personal Relationships, 12, 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchical terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 95–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I. M., & Sigler, R. T. (2000). Forced sexual intercourse among intimates. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolivas, E. D., & Gross, A. M. (2007). Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Siebel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in victim’s experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Scheinberger-Olwig, R., & Bieneck, S. (2003a). Men’s report of nonconsensual sexual interactions with women: Prevalence and impact. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 165–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Waizenhöfer, E., & Möller, I. (2003b). Women’s sexual aggression against men: Prevalence and predictors. Sex Roles, 49, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., & Turner, A. P. (1999). Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms. Sex Roles, 40, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrance, K.-A., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. A., Buddie, A. M., Testa, M., & VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2004). The role of sexual precedence in verbal sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S.-L., Vivian, D., & O’Leary, K. D. (1998). Men’s sexual aggression in marriage: Couples’ reports. Violence against Women, 4, 415–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Krueger, R. F., Magdol, L., Margolin, G., Silva, P. A., & Sydney, R. (1997). Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment, 9, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., Slep, A. M. S., Avery-Leaf, S., & Cascardi, M. (2008). Gender differences in dating aggression among multhiethnic high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 473–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., & Williams, M. C. (2006). Agreement about acts of aggression in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 656–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F., Byers, E. S., & Finkelman, L. (1998). A comparison of male and female college students’ experiences of sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offman, A., & Matheson, K. (2004). The sexual self-perceptions of young women experiencing abuse in dating relationships. Sex Roles, 51, 551–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A. R., & Fromuth, M. E. (2005). Courtship violence using couple data: Characteristics and perceptions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1078–1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poitras, M., & Lavoie, F. (1995). A study of the prevalence of sexual coercion in adolescent heterosexual dating relationships in a Quebec sample. Violence and Victims, 10, 299–313.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Próspero, M. (2008). The effect of coercion on aggression and mental health among reciprocally violent couples. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramisetty-Mikler, S., Caetano, R., & McGrath, C. (2007). Sexual aggression among White, Black and Hispanic couples in the U.S.: Alcohol use, physical assault and psychological aggression as its correlates. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33, 31–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. (1998). Sexual coercion in courtship relations. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (pp. 179–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. (1999). An analysis of empirical estimates of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14, 241–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Anderson, P. B. (2003). Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won’t take No for an answer. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 76–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szinovacz, M. E., & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviours: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, M., VanZile-Tamsen, C., Livingston, J., & Koss, M. (2004). Assessing women’s experiences of sexual aggression using the sexual experiences survey: Evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. L., & Frieze, I. H. (2005). Patterns of violent relationships, psychological distress, and marital satisfaction in a national sample of men and women. Sex Roles, 52, 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Bergeron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brousseau, M.M., Bergeron, S., Hébert, M. et al. Sexual Coercion Victimization and Perpetration in Heterosexual Couples: A Dyadic Investigation. Arch Sex Behav 40, 363–372 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9617-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9617-0

Keywords

Navigation