Skip to main content
Log in

Therapeutic and persistent efficacy of a single injection treatment of ivermectin and moxidectin against Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) on infested cattle

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of a single treatment with either ivermectin or moxidectin was determined by administering a single subcutaneous injection of each endectocide at 200 μg per kg body weight to cattle infested with all parasitic developmental stages (adults, nymphs, and larvae) of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). The percentage reduction in the number of females that reached repletion following treatment (outright kill) was 94.8 and 91.1% for ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. In addition, the reproductive capacity of the females that did survive to repletion was reduced by >99%, regardless of the endectocide. Based on these two factors, the therapeutic level of control obtained against ticks on the cattle at the time of treatment was 99.0 and 99.1% for ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. Engorged females recovered from either group of treated cattle weighed ≈3-times less than untreated females, and the egg masses produced by treated females weighed ≈5–8-times less than egg masses produced by untreated females. Partitioning of data into three separate 7-d post-treatment intervals allowed for an estimation of the efficacy of each endectocide against each individual parasitic development stage (adult, nymph, and larva). Results indicated that both endectocides were ≥99.7% effective against ticks that were in either the adult or nymphal stage at the time of treatment. However, the level of control against ticks in the larval stage of development at treatment was significantly lower at 97.9 and 98.4% for ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. Analysis of the persistent (residual) activity of the two endectocides indicated that neither material provided total protection against larval re-infestation for even 1-wk following treatment. Against larvae infested 1–4 wk following treatment, the level of control with moxidectin ranged from 92.4% (1 wk) to 19.5% (4 wk). These control levels were higher at each weekly interval than for ivermectin, which ranged from 82.4% (1 wk) to 0.0% (4 wk). The potential for the use of these injectable endectocide formulations in the US Boophilus Eradication Program is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • W.S. Abbott (1925) ArticleTitleA method for computing effectiveness of an insecticide J. Econ. Entomol. 18 265–267 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaB2MXhvFGlsQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • G. Aguilar-Tipacamu R.I. Rodriguez-Vivas (2003) ArticleTitleEffect of moxidectin against natural infestation of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae) in the Mexican tropics Vet. Parasitol. 111 211–216 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00355-2 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXivVSrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12531295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • L. Caproni SuffixJr. O. Umehara E. Moro L.C.B. Goncalves (1998) ArticleTitleField efficacy of doramectin and ivermectin against natural infestations of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus Brazil. J. Vet. Parasitol. 7 151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • L.G. Cramer L.A.F. Carvalho A.A. Bridi N.K. Amaral R.A. Barrick (1988a) ArticleTitleEfficacy of topically applied ivermectin against Boophilus microplus (Canestrini1887) in cattle Vet. Parasitol. 29 341–349 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-4017(88)90151-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FntlKktQ%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L.G. Cramer A.A. Bridi N.K. Amaral S.J. Gross (1988b) ArticleTitlePersistent activity of injectable ivermectin in the control of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus Vet. Rec. 122 611–612 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1czgs1Wrsg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Davey E.H. Ahrens (1982) ArticleTitleControl of Boophilus ticks on cattle with a flowable formulation of coumaphos J. Econ. Entomol. 75 228–231 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3s%2FgvVSjtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7119263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Davey E.H. Ahrens J.E. George (1997) ArticleTitleComparative effectiveness of coumaphos treatments applied by different methods for the control of Boophilus mi croplus (Acari: Ixodidae) J. Agric. Entomol. 14 45–54 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXht1alurk%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Davey J.E. George D.E. Snyder (2001) ArticleTitleEfficacy of a single whole-body spray treatment of spinosadagainst Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) on cattle Vet. Parasitol. 99 41–52 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00456-3 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXkvVent7c%3D Occurrence Handle11445154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Davey J.E. George (2002) ArticleTitleEfficacy of macrocyclic lactone endectocides against Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) infested cattle using different pour-on application treatment regimes J. Med. Entomol. 39 763–769 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnvVSkurs%3D Occurrence Handle12349860

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • S.H. Fragoso N. Soberanes M. Ortiz M. Santamaria A. Ortiz (1995) Epidemiologia de la resistencia a ixodicidas piretroides en garrapatas Boophilus microplus en la Republica Mexicana S. Rodriguez H. Fragoso (Eds) Proceeding of the 3rd Seminario International de Parasitologia Animal: Resistencia y control en garrapatas y moscas de importancia veterinaria De Iconica Impresores, Jintepec, Mor Mexico 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • George J.E. and Davey R.B. 2004. The therapeutic and persistent efficacy of a single application of doramectin applied either as a pour-on or injection to cattle infested with Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 41: 402–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales J.C., Muniz R.A., Farias A., Goncalves L.C.B. and Rew R.S. 1993. Therapeutic and persistent efficacy of doramectin against Boophilus microplus in cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 49: 107–119.

  • O.H. Graham J.L. Hourrigan (1977) ArticleTitleEradication programs for the arthropod parasites of livestock J. Med. Entomol. 13 629–658 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE2s3jtVaqug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle328882

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Guglielmone A.J. Mangold M.E. Munoz-Cobenas N. Scherling F. Garcia-Posse O.S. Anziani M. Ioppolo (2000) ArticleTitleMoxidectin pour-on for control of natural populations of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae) Vet. Parasitol. 87 237–241 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00173-9 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXntlegu7k%3D Occurrence Handle10622616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • L.F. Hitchcock (1955) ArticleTitleStudies on the parasitic stages of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acarina: Ixodidae) Aust. J. Zool. 3 145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • A.Y. Li R.B. Davey R.J. Miller J.E. George (2004) ArticleTitleDetection and characterization of amitraz resistance in the southern cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) J. Med. Entomol. 41 193–200 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXltFKgtb0%3D Occurrence Handle15061278 Occurrence Handle10.1603/0022-2585-41.2.193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Maske M.R. Sardey N.G. Bhilegaonkar (1992) ArticleTitleTreatment of tick infestations in cattle with ivermectin Indian Vet. J. 69 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Miller R.B. Davey George (1999) ArticleTitleCharacterization of pyrethroid resistance and susceptibility to coumaphos in Mexican Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) J. Med. Entomol. 36 533–538 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgsVyntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10534945

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • B. Remington P. Kieran R. Cobb D. Bodero (1997) ArticleTitleThe application of moxidectin formulations for control of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) under Queensland field conditions Aust. Vet. J. 75 588–591 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXnsVyrsrg%3D Occurrence Handle9293342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1999. SAS user’s manual, version 8.2 for Windows. SAS InstituteCary, N.C.

  • G.J. Sibson (1994) ArticleTitleThe effects of moxidectin against natural infestations of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) Aust. Vet. J. 71 381–382 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXlt1ehu7k%3D Occurrence Handle7726764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • N.C. Soberanes M.V. Santamaria H.S. Fragoso Z.V. Garcia (2002) ArticleTitleFirst case reported of amitraz resistance in the cattle tick Boophilus microplus in Mexico Tec. Pecu. Mex. 40 81–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald B. Davey.

Additional information

This paper reports the results of research only. Mention of a commercial or proprietary product in this paper does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In conducting the research described in this report, the investigators adhered to protocol approved by the USDA-ARS Animal Welfare Committee. The protocol is on file at the USDA-ARS, Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Laboratory, Tick Research Unit, Kerrville, TX. The U.S. Government’s right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright is acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davey, R.B., Miller, J.A., George, J.E. et al. Therapeutic and persistent efficacy of a single injection treatment of ivermectin and moxidectin against Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) on infested cattle. Exp Appl Acarol 35, 117–129 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-004-2046-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-004-2046-9

Keywords

Navigation