Skip to main content
Log in

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) adaptively monitor uncertainty while multi-tasking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As researchers explore animals’ capacity for metacognition and uncertainty monitoring, some paradigms allow the criticism that animal participants—who are always extensively trained in one stimulus domain within which they learn to avoid difficult trials—use task-specific strategies to avoid aversive stimuli instead of responding to a generalized state of uncertainty like that humans might use. We addressed this criticism with an uncertainty-monitoring task environment in which four different task domains were interleaved randomly trial by trial. Four of five macaques (Macaca mulatta) were able to make adaptive uncertainty responses while multi-tasking, suggesting the generality of the psychological signal that occasions these responses. The findings suggest that monkeys may have an uncertainty-monitoring capacity that is like that of humans in transcending task-specific cues and extending simultaneously to multiple domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson RC, Juola JF (1974) Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In: Krantz DH, Atkinson RC, Luce RD, Suppes P (eds) Learning, memory and thinking. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 242–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ, Smith JD, Redford JS, Washburn DA (2006) Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) monitor uncertainty during numerosity judgments. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 32:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring EG (1920) The control of attitude in psychophysical experiments. Psychol Rev 27:440–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Carpenter M (2001) Do apes and children know what they have seen? Anim Cogn 4:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers P (2008) Meta-cognition in animals: a skeptical Look. Mind Lang 23:58–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernberger SW (1914) The effect of the attitude of the subject upon the measure of sensitivity. Am J Psychol 25:538–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34:906–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote A, Crystal J (2007) Metacognition in the rat. Curr Biol 17:551–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup GG (1982) Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. Am J Primatol 2:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghetti S, Lyons K, Lazzarin F (2008) The development of metamemory monitoring during retrieval: the case of memory strength and memory absence. J Exp Child Psychol 99:157–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton RR (2001) Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5359–5362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A (1993) How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychol Rev 100:609–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A (2007) Metacognition and consciousness. In: Zelazo PD, Moscovitch M, Thompson E (eds) The Cambridge handbook of consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A, Ma’ayan H, Nussinson R (2006) The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. J Exp Psychol Gen 135:36–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornell N, Son L, Terrace H (2007) Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychol Sci 18:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn D (2000) Metacognitive development. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockl K, Schneider W (2002) Developmental trends in children’s feeling-of-knowing judgements. Int J Behav Dev 26:327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J (2000) Metamemory: theory and data. In: Tulving E, Craik FIM (eds) The Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 197–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson TO (ed) (1992) Metacognition: core readings. Allyn and Bacon, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson TO (1996) Consciousness and metacognition. Am Psychol 51:102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust J (2003) Does metacognition necessarily involve metarepresentation? Behav Brain Sci 26:352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust J (2007) Metacognition and metarepresentation: is a self-directed theory of mind a precondition for metacognition? Synthese 2:271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers CM, von der Linden N, Schneider W, Howie P (2007) Children’s metamemorial judgments in an event recall task. J Exp Child Psychol 97:117–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM, Richardson WK, Washburn DA, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Hopkins WD (1989) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), video tasks, and implications for stimulus-response spatial contiguity. J Comp Psychol 103:32–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz BL (1994) Sources of information in metamemory: judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychon Bull Rev 1:357–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields WE, Smith JD, Guttmannova K, Washburn DA (2005) Confidence judgments by humans and rhesus monkeys. J Gen Psychol 132:165–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin RM, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychol Rev 84:127–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Shields WE, Allendoerfer KR, Washburn WA (1998) Memory monitoring by animals and humans. J Exp Psychol Gen 127:227–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Shields WE, Washburn DA (2003) The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behav Brain Sci 26:317–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Beran MJ, Redford JS, Washburn DA (2006) Dissociating uncertainty states and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of metacognition. J Exp Psychol Gen 135:282–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Beran MJ, Coutinho MVC, Couchman JC (2008) The comparative study of metacognition: Sharper paradigms, safer inferences. Psychon Bull Rev 154:679–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Beran MJ, Couchman JJ, Coutinho MVC, Boomer J (2009) Animal metacognition: problems and prospects. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 4:33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Suda-King C (2008) Do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) know when they do not remember? Anim Cogn 11:21–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton JE, Shettleworth SJ (2008) Memory without awareness: Pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching-to-sample. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 34:266–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn DA, Rumbaugh DM (1992) Testing primates with joystick-based automated apparatus: lessons from the Language Research Center’s Computerized Test System. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 24:157–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn DA, Smith JD, Shields WE (2006) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) immediately generalize the uncertain response. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 32:85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson CS, Kellogg SC, Kawanishi DT, Lucas PA (1973) The uncertain response in detection-oriented psychophysics. J Exp Psychol 99:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD-38051 and by Grant BCS-0634662 from the National Science Foundation. All applicable institutional rules and regulations regarding animal care and use were followed in the care and testing of the monkeys, and the experiment complied with all laws of the United States of America. The authors thank Theodore Evans for his assistance with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. David Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, J.D., Redford, J.S., Beran, M.J. et al. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) adaptively monitor uncertainty while multi-tasking. Anim Cogn 13, 93–101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0249-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0249-5

Keywords

Navigation