Skip to main content
Log in

Mesh terminology 101

Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In any collaborative endeavor, when fields like medicine and bioengineering overlap, the proper use of technical vocabulary takes on added importance. It is important that scientists and clinicians, while coming from different backgrounds and educational systems, agree upon and utilize a common language based on mutually understood concepts and definitions. Regarding biomaterial testing applications, numerous terms are used to describe a wide variety of material behaviors when test specimens are subjected to mechanical, chemical, electrical and thermal stressors. In this discussion we will limit ourselves to the mechanical properties of materials which are utilized for soft tissue or fascial-based repairs. Following a literature search combining the keywords surgical mesh and biomaterials testing, common terms used to describe the mechanical properties of mesh were selected. Our analysis seeks to define the following terms and describe their applicability within the context of biomaterials for hernia repair: elasticity, stiffness, flexibility, tensile strength, distension, deformation, bending stiffness, and compliance. Unfortunately, in the technical literature, terms are often altered or extrapolated without adequate explanation. In other cases, related but technically different terms are mistakenly used interchangeably. With the mounting interest in biomaterials for the use in repair of abdominal wall defects, there is a need to standardize the terminology used to describe the biomechanical properties of mesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop W, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk E, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–585

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. EU Hernia Trialist Collaboration (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods on open groin hernia repair. Systematic review of randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 87:854–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Debord JR (1998) The historical development of prosthetics in hernia surgery. Surg Clin North Am 78:973–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13:545–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. American Society for Testing and Materials. http://www.astm.org

  6. Park JB (1992) Characterization of materials. In: Park JB, Lakes RS (eds) Biomaterials: an introduction. Plenum Press, New York, pp 29–62

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chao EYS, Aro HT (1991) Biomechanics of fracture fixation. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC (eds) Basic orthopaedic biomechanics. Raven Press, New York, pp 330–333

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carew EO, Cooke FW, Lemons JE, Ratner BD, Vesely I, Vogler E (2004) Properties of materials. In: Ratner BD et al (eds) Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, pp 23–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. S. Cobb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cobb, W.S., Peindl, R.M., Zerey, M. et al. Mesh terminology 101. Hernia 13, 1–6 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0428-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0428-3

Keywords

Navigation