Abstract
This paper examines the philosophy and evolution of volcanological science in recent years, particularly in relation to the growth of volcanic hazard and risk science. It uses the lens of Science and Technology Studies to examine the ways in which knowledge generation is controlled and directed by social forces, particularly during eruptions, which constitute landmarks in the development of new technologies and models. It also presents data from a survey of volcanologists carried out during late 2008 and early 2009. These data concern the felt purpose of the science according to the volcanologists who participated and their impressions of the most important eruptions in historical time. It demonstrates that volcanologists are motivated both by the academic science environment and by a social concern for managing the impact of volcanic hazards on populations. Also discussed are the eruptions that have most influenced the discipline and the role of scientists in policymaking on active volcanoes. Expertise in volcanology can become the primary driver of public policy very suddenly when a volcano erupts, placing immense pressure on volcanologists. In response, the epistemological foundations of volcanology are on the move, with an increasing volume of research into risk assessment and management. This requires new, integrated methodologies for knowledge collection that transcend scientific disciplinary boundaries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspinall, W. P. (1998). Expert judgement and the Montserrat volcano eruption. In: Mosleh, A. Bari, R. A. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management PSAM4, New York City, 13–18 September 1998. pp. 2113–2118
Aspinall WP (2006) Structured elicitation of expert judgement for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment in volcanic eruptions. In: SCHM Mader, C Connor, L Connor (eds) Statistics in volcanology, 1. Geological Society, London. pp. 15–30
Aspinall WP (2010) A route to more tractable expert advice. Nature 463:294–295
Aspinall W, Sparks RSJ (2004) Volcanology and the law. IAVCEI News 1:4
Aspinall WP, Loughlin SC, Michael FV, Miller AD, Norton GE, Rowley KC, Sparks RSJ, Young SR (2002) The Montserrat Volcano Observatory: its evolution, organization, role and activities. Geol Soc Lond Mem 21(1):71–91
Aspinall WP, Woo G, Voight B, Baxter PJ (2003) Evidence-based volcanology: application to eruption crises. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 128:273–285
Balsiger PW (2004) Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36(4):407–421
Barberi F, Davis MS, Isaia R, Nave R, Ricci T (2008) Volcanic risk perception in the Vesuvius population. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):244
Baxter PJ, Aspinall WP, Neri A, Zuccaro G, Spence R, Cioni R, Woo G (2008) Emergency planning and mitigation at Vesuvius: a new evidence-based approach. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178(3):454
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, New Delhi (German original, 1986)
Bostok D (1978) Editorial: a deontological code for volcanologists? J Volcanol Geotherm Res 4(1–2):1
Chester DK, Duncan AM, Dibben CJL (2008) The importance of religion in shaping volcanic risk perception in Italy, with special reference to Vesuvius and Etna. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):216–228
Clay EB, Barrow C, Benson C, Dempster J, Kokelaar BP, Pillai N, Seaman J (1999) An evaluation of HMG’s response to the Montserrat volcanic emergency. Department for International Development, London
Collins H (2004a) Gravity’s shadow: the search for gravitational waves. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Collins H (2004b) Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 3(2):125–143
Collins H, Evans R (2007) Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
De la Cruz-Reyna S, Tilling RI (2008) Scientific and public responses to the ongoing volcanic crisis at Popocatépetl Volcano, Mexico: importance of an effective hazards-warning system. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 170(1–2):121–134
De Marchi B (2003) Public participation and risk governance. Sci Public Policy 30(3):171–176
Dibben CJL (2008) Leaving the city for the suburbs—the dominance of ‘ordinary’ decision making over volcanic risk perception in the production of volcanic risk on Mt Etna, Sicily. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):288
Dominey-Howes D, Minos-Minopoulos D (2004) Perceptions of hazard and risk on Santorini. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 137:285–310
Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2011) Rationalising a crisis through literature: Montserratian verse and the descriptive reconstruction of an island. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 203(3–4):87–101
Druitt TH, Kokelaar BP (eds) (2002) The eruption of the Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat, from 1995 to 1999. Geological Society of London, London
Evans R, Plows A (2007) Listening without prejudice? Re-discovering the value of the disinterested citizen. Soc Stud Sci 37:827–853
Fergus HA (2003) Volcano verses. Peepal Tree, Leeds
Field A (2000) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage, London
Fischer F (2010) Democracy and expertise: reorienting policy inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Fiske R (1984) Volcanologists, journalists and the concerned local public: a tale of two crises in the Eastern Caribbean. Explosive volcanism: inception, evolution and hazards. National Academy Press, Washington
Foucault M (1968) The archaeology of knowledge. Routledge, Abingdon
Foucault M (1980) Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon, New York
Foucault M (1982) The subject and power. Crit Inq 8(4):777–795
Galle B, Johansson M, Rivera C, Zhang Y, Kihlman M, Kern C, Lehmann T, Platt U, Arellano S, Hidalgo S (2010) Network for Observation of Volcanic and Atmospheric Change (NOVAC); a global network for volcanic gas monitoring: network layout and instrument description. J Geophys Res 115(D5):D05304
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London
Golinski J (1992) Science as public culture: chemistry and enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gregg CE, Houghton BF, Johnston DM, Paton D, Swanson DA (2004) The perception of volcanic risk in Kona communities from Mauna Loa and Hualalai volcanoes, Hawaii. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 130:179–196
Hacking I (1999) The social construction of what? Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Haynes K (2005) Exploring the communication of risk during a volcanic crisis: a case study of Montserrat, West Indies. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia
Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2007) The issue of trust and its influence on risk communication during a volcanic crisis. Bull Volcanol 70(5):605–621
Horlick-Jones T, Sime J (2004) Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36(4):441
IAVCEI Subcommittee for Crisis Protocols (1999) Professional conduct of scientists during volcanic crises. Bull Volcanol 60:323–334, comment and reply in Bull Volcanol 62: 62–64
Irwin A (2008) In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J (eds) STS perspectives on scientific governance. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 583–608
Irwin A, Wynne B (eds) (1996) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jasanoff S (1990) The Fifth Branch: science advisors as policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Jasanoff S (1996) Beyond epistemology: relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Soc Stud Sci 26(2):393–418
Jasanoff S (2003) (No?) Accounting for expertise. Sci Public Policy 30(3):157–162
Jasanoff S (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, Abingdon
Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Jasanoff S (2007) Technologies of humility. Nature 450:33
Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lawrence RJ, Després C (2004) Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36(4):397
Leach M, Scoones I (2004) In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizenship in a global context. Science and citizens: globalisation and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London
Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) (2004) Science and citizens: globalisation and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London
Lynch M, Cole S (2005) Science and technology studies on trial: dilemmas of expertise. Soc Stud Sci 35:269–311
Martello M (2004) Global change science and the Arctic citizen. Sci Public Policy 31(2):107–115
Marzocchi W, Sandri L, Gasparini P, Newhall C, Boschi E (2004) Quantifying probabilities of volcanic events: the example of volcanic hazard at Mount Vesuvius. J Geophys Res 109:201
Metzner-Szigeth A (2009) Contradictory approaches? On realism and constructivism in the social sciences research on risk, technology and the environment. Futures 41:156–170
Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Neri A, Aspinall WP, Cioni R, Bertagnini A, Baxter PJ, Zuccaro G, Andronico D, Barsotti S, Cole PD, Esposti-Ongaro T, Hincks TK, Macedonio G, Papale P, Rosi M, Santacroce R, Woo G (2008) Developing an Event Tree for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment at Vesuvius. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178(3):397
Newhall C, Hoblitt RP (2002) Constructing event trees for volcanic crises. Bull Volcanol 64:3–20
Newhall C, Punongbayan R (1996) In: Scarpa R, Tilling RI (eds) The narrow margin of successful volcanic-risk mitigation. Monitoring and mitigation of volcano hazards. Springer, New York, pp 807–832
Nowotny H (2003) Dilemma of expertise: democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Public Policy 30(3):151–156
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge
Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263(5147):641–646
Pattullo P (2000) Fire from the mountain: the tragedy of Montserrat and the betrayal of its people. Constable, London
Pedynowski D (2003) Science(s) which, when and whose? Probing the metanarrative of scientific knowledge in the social construction of nature. Prog Hum Geogr 27:735–752
Popper K (1963) Towards a rational theory of tradition Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge, London (original lecture, 1949)
Radder H (1998) The politics of STS. Soc Stud Sci 28(2):325–331
Rayner S (2003) Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Sci Public Policy 30(3):163–170
Renn O (2008) Risk governance. Earthscan, London
Shapin S (1984) Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology. Soc Stud Sci 14:481–520
Shapin S (1995) Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge. Annu Rev Sociol 21:289–321
Shapin S (1998) Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Trans Inst Br Geogr 23(1):5
Sparks RSJ (2003) Forecasting volcanic eruptions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 210:1–15
Sparks RSJ, Aspinall W (2004) Volcanic activity: frontiers and challenges in forecasting, prediction and risk assessment. The state of the planet: frontiers and challenges in Geophysics. Geophysical Monograph 150; IUGG Volume 19
Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. EMBO Rep 8(4):309–315
Taleb NN (2007) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Allen Lane, London
Traweek S (1988) Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high-energy physicists. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Turner S (2001) What is the problem with experts? Soc Stud Sci 31(1):123–149
Webster A (2007) Crossing boundaries: social science in the policy room. Sci Tech Hum Values 32(4):458–478
Weill C (2003) Expert and public consultation: can consultation of both experts and the public help developing public policy? Some aspects of the debate in France. Sci Public Policy 30(3):199–203
Wynne B (1989) Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: a case study in communicating scientific information. Environment 31(2):33–39
Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 2(2):111–127
Wynne B (2007) Dazzled by the mirage of influence? STS-SSK in multivalent registers of relevance Science. Technol Hum Values 32(4):491–503
Wynne B, Felt U, Callon M, Gonçalves M, Jasanoff S, Jepsen M, Joly P-B, Konopasek Z, May S, Neubauer C, Rip A, Siune K, Stirling A, Tallacchini M (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously. Expert Group on Science and Governance, Brussels, European Commission D-G Research, Science Economy and Society Directorate
Acknowledgements
AD acknowledges a NERC-ESRC PhD studentship. The authors would like to thank Chris Newhall and Augusto Neri for very thorough and helpful reviews, which significantly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: H. Delgado Granados
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donovan, A., Oppenheimer, C. & Bravo, M. Social studies of volcanology: knowledge generation and expert advice on active volcanoes. Bull Volcanol 74, 677–689 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0547-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0547-z