Skip to main content
Log in

Females make tough neighbors: sex-specific competitive effects in seedlings of a dioecious grass

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If males and females of a species differ in their effect on intraspecific competition then this can have significant ecological and evolutionary consequences because it can lead to size and mortality disparities between the sexes, and thus cause biased population sex ratios. If the degree of sexual dimorphism of competitive effect varies across environments then this variation can generate sex ratio variation within and between populations. In a California population of Distichlis spicata, a dioecious grass species exhibiting extreme within-population sex ratio variation (spatial segregation of the sexes), I evaluated the intraspecific competitive effects of male and female D. spicata seedlings in three soil types. The sex of seedlings was determined using a RAPD-PCR marker co-segregating with female phenotype. Distichlis spicata seedlings, regardless of sex, were six times larger when grown with male versus female conspecific seedlings in soil from microsites where the majority of D. spicata plants are female, and this sexual dimorphism of competitive effect was weaker or did not occur in other soil types. This study suggests that it is not just the higher costs of female versus male reproduction itself that cause spatial segregation of the sexes in D. spicata, but that differences in competitive abilities between the sexes—which occur as early as the seedling stage—can generate sex ratio variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ågren JK, Danell K, Elmqvist T, Ericson L, Hjältén J (1999) Sexual dimorphism and biotic interactions. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 217–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams PB (1980) Life history patterns in marine fishes and their consequences for fisheries management. Fish Bull 78:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetle A (1943) The North American variations of Distichlis spicata. Bull Torrey Bot Club 70:638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertiller MB, Sain CL, Bisigato AJ, Coronato FR, Ares JO, Graff P (2002) Spatial sex segregation in the dioecious grass Poa ligularis in northern Patagonia: the role of environmental patchiness. Biodivers Conserv 11:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P, Eckhart V (1988) Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. Am Nat 132:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conn JS, Blum U (1981) Differentiation between the sexes of Rumex hastatulus in net energy allocation, flowering, and height. Bull Torrey Bot Club 108:446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1990) Apparent versus “real” competition in plants. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives in plant competition. Academic, San Diego, pp 9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TE, Geber MA (1999) Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 175–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF (1999) Sexual dimorphism in life history. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 149–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart V M (1999) Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescence. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 123–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppley SM (2000) Intrapopulation sex ratio variation and sexual specialization in the Dioecious grass Distichlis spicata. Dissertation, University of California

  • Eppley SM (2001) Gender-specific selection during early life-history stages in the dioecious grass Distichlis spicata. Ecology 82:2022–2031

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppley SM, Stanton ML, Grosberg RK (1998) Intrapopulation sex ratio variation in the salt grass Distichlis spicata. Am Nat 152:659–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Flachowsky H, Schumann E, Weber WE, Peil A. (2001) Application of AFLP for the detection of sex-specific markers in hemp. Plant Breeding 120:305–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman DC, Klikoff LG, Harper KT (1976) Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193:597–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1988) Plant size, spacing patterns, and host-plant selection in Osyris quadripartita, a hemiparasitic dioecious shrub. J Ecol 76:995–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock AS (1971) Manual of the grasses of the United States. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias MC, Bell G (1989) The small-scale spatial distribution of male and female plants. Oecologia 80:229–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpelainen H (1991) Sex ratio variation and spatial segregation of the sexes in populations of Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella (Polygonaceae). Plant Syst Evol 174:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Bot Rev 43:177–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokker C, Susko D, Lovett-Doust L, Lovett-Doust J (1994) Population genetic structure of Vallisneria americana, a dioecious clonal macrophyte. Am J Bot 81:1004–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett-Doust J, O’Brien G, Lovett-Doust L (1987) Effect of density on secondary sex characteristics and sex ratio in Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 74:40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher TR (1994) The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). II. Response to sex-specific selection. Evolution 48:939–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller J, Lovett Doust J (1987) The effects of plant density and snail grazing on female and male spinach plants. New Phytol 107:613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Weeden NF, Kesseli R, Carroll SB (1992) DNA probes for the Y-chromosome of Silene latifolia, a dioecious angiosperm. Sex Plant Reprod 5:86–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyekwelu SS, Harper JL (1979) Sex ratio and niche differentiation in spinach (Spinacea oleracea L.). Nature 282:609–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Promislow DEL, Harvey PH (1990) Living fast and dying young: a comparative analysis of life-history variation among mammals. J Zool 220:417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purrington CB, Schmitt J (1995) Sexual dimorphism of dormancy and survivorship in buried seeds of Silene latifolia. J Ecol 83:795–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain PD, Harper JL (1972) Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. V. Mechanisms governing the sex ratio in Rumex acetosa and Rumex acetosella. J Ecol 60:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1996) JMP for windows. Release 3.1.6.2. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea MM, Dixon PM, Sharitz, RR (1993) Size differences, sex ratio, and spatial distribution of male and female water tupelo, Nyssa aquatica (Nyssaceae). Am J Bot 80:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R (1989) Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q Rev Biol 64:419–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank M. Shah, A. Shaw, and D. Thiede for help in the greenhouse. I am grateful to R. Grosberg for lab space and support and to B. Cameron for help in the lab. I thank R. Buggs, R. Grosberg, D. Obbard, J. Pannell, A. Shaw, M. Shaw, M. Stanton, S. Strauss and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Research was supported by University of California Bodega Marine Laboratory, Center for Population Biology at U.C. Davis, NSF grant DEB 97-01338, NSF grant INT 0202645, and a US Environmental Protection Agency STAR fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah M. Eppley.

Additional information

Communicated by Christian Koerner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eppley, S.M. Females make tough neighbors: sex-specific competitive effects in seedlings of a dioecious grass. Oecologia 146, 549–554 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0026-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0026-3

Keywords

Navigation