Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term results of different treatment modalities in 37 patients with glomus jugulare tumors

  • Head and neck oncology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of different forms of treatment of 37 patients with previously untreated glomus jugulare tumors were compared retrospectively. According to the Fisch classification system, 6 patients presented with class B tumors, 19 class C and 12 patients with class D. Twenty-eight patients underwent surgery and 9 patients had primary radiation therapy (to 50 Gy). In 20 of the surgical cases (71%), radical tumor removal could be achieved and required no further treatment over a follow-up period of 8.6 years (range 2–15 years). Incomplete tumor resection with postoperative radiation therapy resulted in progressive tumor growth in three cases. One patient in this group experienced subarachnoid bleeding that had to be managed by salvage surgery. After primary radiation therapy, glomus jugulare tumors were still evident on magnetic resonance imaging scans, but showed no signs of disease progression. As a result of our experience, we found that a one-stage radical tumor resection performed in collaboration by otologic surgeons and neurosurgeons was the best treatment for patients with large glomus jugulare tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 9 April 1998 / Accepted: 21 December 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gstoettner, W., Matula, C., Hamzavi, J. et al. Long-term results of different treatment modalities in 37 patients with glomus jugulare tumors. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 256, 351–355 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050050162

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050050162

Navigation