Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the Ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative ileus is a significant clinical challenge lacking effective management strategies. Ghrelin-receptor stimulation has promotility effects in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.

Objective

This proof-of-concept, phase 2, randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ghrelin-receptor agonist ipamorelin in the treatment of postoperative ileus following abdominal surgery (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00672074).

Design

The design was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

Settings

The settings include hospital inpatients.

Patients

The patients were adults undergoing small and large bowel resection by open or laparoscopic surgery.

Intervention

The intervention was intravenous infusions of 0.03-mg/kg ipamorelin vs placebo twice daily, on postoperative day 1 to 7 or hospital discharge.

Main outcome measures

Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and laboratory tests. The key efficacy endpoint was time from first dose of study drug to tolerance of a standardized solid meal.

Results

One hundred seventeen patients were enrolled, of whom 114 patients composed the safety and modified intent-to-treat populations. Demographic and disease characteristics were balanced between groups. Overall incidence of any treatment-emergent adverse events was 87.5 % in the ipamorelin group and 94.8 % in placebo group. Median time to first tolerated meal was 25.3 and 32.6 h in the ipamorelin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.15).

Limitations

This proof of concept study was small and enrolled patients with a broad range of underlying conditions.

Conclusions

Ipamorelin 0.03-mg/kg twice daily for up to 7 days was well tolerated. There were no significant differences between ipamorelin and placebo in the key and secondary efficacy analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delaney CP (2004) Clinical perspective on postoperative ileus and the effect of opiates. Neurogastroenterol Motil 169(suppl 2):61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Augestad KM, Delaney CP (2010) Postoperative ileus: impact of pharmacological treatment, laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery pathways. World J Gastroenterol 16:2067–2074

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Senagore AJ (2007) Pathogenesis and clinical and economic consequences of postoperative ileus. Am J Health Syst Pharm 64:S3–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lubawski J, Saclarides T (2008) Postoperative ileus: strategies for reduction. Ther Clin Risk Manag 4:913–917

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kehlet H (2008) Postoperative ileus—an update on preventive techniques. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:552–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ENTEREG [package insert] (2012) Lexington, MA: Cubist Pharmaceuticals; 2012

  9. Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM et al (2004) Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting mu opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 240:728–734

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delaney CP, Wolff BG, Viscusi ER et al (2007) Alvimopan, for postoperative ileus following bowel resection: a pooled analysis of phase III studies. Ann Surg 245:355–363

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poston S, Broder MS, Gibbons MM et al (2011) Impact of alvimopan (entereg) on hospital costs after bowel resection: results from a large inpatient database. P T 36:209–220

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Masuda Y, Tanaka T, Inomata N et al (2000) Ghrelin stimulates gastric acid secretion and motility in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 276(3):905–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Asakawa A, Inui A, Kaga T et al (2001) Ghrelin is an appetite stimulatory signal from stomach with structural resemblance to motilin. Gastroenterology 120(2):337–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tack J, Depoortere I, Bisschops R et al (2006) Influence of ghrelin on interdigestive gastrointestinal motility in humans. Gut 55(3):327–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murray CD, Martin NM, Patterson M et al (2005) Ghrelin enhances gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis: a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Gut 54:1693–1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkova K, Mann W, Nelson R, Greenwood-Van MB (2009) Efficacy of ipamorelin, a novel ghrelin mimetic, in a rodent model of postoperative ileus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 329:1110–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson ED, Hersh T, Brinner RA, Barnett SM, Boyle LP (1979) The effects of metoclopramide on postoperative ileus. A randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 190:27–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan DC, Liu YC, Chen CJ et al (2005) Preventing prolonged post-operative ileus in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy and intra-peritoneal chemotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 11:4776–4781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wren AM, Seal LJ, Cohen MA et al (2001) Ghrelin enhances appetite and increases food intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw M, Pediconi C, McVey D et al (2013) Safety and efficacy of ulimorelin administered postoperatively to accelerate recovery of gastrointestinal motility following partial bowel resection: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56:888–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salvador CG, Sikirica M, Evans A, Pizzi L, Goldfarb N (2005) Clinical and economic outcome of prolonged postoperative ileus in patients undergoing hysterectomy and hemicolectomy. P T 30:590–595

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goldstein JL, Matuszewski KA, Delaney CP, et al (2013) Inpatient economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with abdominal surgery in the United States. P T. 2007;32:82–90. Available at http://www.ptcommunity.com/ptjournal/fulltext/32/2/PTJ3202082.pdf. Accessed 11.26.2013

  23. Iyer S, Saunders WB, Stemkowski S (2009) Economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with colectomy in the United States. J Manag Care Pharm 15:485–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients and all of the Investigators and study staff who participated in this study. Support for developing this manuscript was provided by Helsinn Therapeutics (US), Inc. (Bridgewater, NJ), and copyediting, editorial assistance, and production assistance were provided by The Curry Rockefeller Group, LLC (Tarrytown, NY).

Conflicts of interest and source of funding

This study was supported by Helsinn Therapeutics (US), Inc. The authors’ institutions received grants from Helsinn Therapeutics (US), Inc., to conduct the study. The authors declare no financial or proprietary conflicts of interest.

Contributions

Conception and design: DEB, WBS; data collection: DEB, WBS, MDM; data analysis: DEB; data interpretation: DEB; drafting of manuscript: DEB, WBS, MDM; critical revision: DEB, WBS, MDM; final approval: DEB, WBS, MDM.

Category

Postoperative management

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Beck.

Appendix

Appendix

Ipamorelin 201 study group investigators

Robert Beart, MD, University of Southern California/Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; David Beck, MD, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA; Roberto Bergamaschi, MD, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY; Sander Binderow, MD, Saint Joseph’s Hospital of Atlanta, GA; James Fleshman, MD, Barnes-Jewish West, Creve Coeur, MO; Phillip Fleshner, MD, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Walter Koltun, MD, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA; Martin McCarter, MD, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Christopher Raeburn, MD, Denver VA Hospital, Denver, CO; Janice Rafferty, MD, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH; Bruce Robb, MD, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; Marc Singer, MD, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; Thomas Stahl, MD, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brian Sweeney, MD, University of Massachusetts Memorial Healthcare, Worcester, MA; Theresa Terem, MD, St. Joseph Hospital Franciscan Research Center, Tacoma, WA; Harry Wasvary, MD, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI; Steven Wexner, MD, Cleveland Clinic of Weston, Weston, FL; Sherry Wren, MD, Palo Alto Veterans Hospital, Palo Alto, CA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, D.E., Sweeney, W.B., McCarter, M.D. et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the Ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 1527–1534 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2030-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2030-8

Keywords

Navigation