Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying division of labor: borrowing tools from sociology, sociobiology, information theory, landscape ecology, and biogeography

  • Review article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

How do we quantify division of labor? We review several fields (sociology, landscape ecology, statistics, information theory, and biogeography) that have been cognizant of these questions and been somewhat successful at answering them. We review fourteen indices for quantifying division of labor, sensu lato, which can be categorized into four families: Shannon’s index/entropy, Simpson’s index, geometric mean, and standard/absolute deviation (including coefficients of variation). We argue that those indices using matrix inputs will simultaneously quantify the interplay between all individuals and all tasks and will thus best capture the essence of division of labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Gorelick.

Additional information

Received 29 March 2006; revised 16 November 2006; accepted 12 February 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorelick, R., Bertram, S.M. Quantifying division of labor: borrowing tools from sociology, sociobiology, information theory, landscape ecology, and biogeography. Insect. Soc. 54, 105–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-007-0923-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-007-0923-z

Keywords:

Navigation