Skip to main content
Log in

Darwin’s contributions to genetics

Journal of Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Darwin’s contributions to evolutionary biology are well known, but his contributions to genetics are much less known. His main contribution was the collection of a tremendous amount of genetic data, and an attempt to provide a theoretical framework for its interpretation. Darwin clearly described almost all genetic phenomena of fundamental importance, such as prepotency (Mendelian inheritance), bud variation (mutation), heterosis, reversion (atavism), graft hybridization (Michurinian inheritance), sex-limited inheritance, the direct action of the male element on the female (xenia and telegony), the effect of use and disuse, the inheritance of acquired characters (Lamarckian inheritance), and many other observations pertaining to variation, heredity and development. To explain all these observations, Darwin formulated a developmental theory of heredity — Pangenesis — which not only greatly influenced many subsequent theories, but also is supported by recent evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin CR, Bishop MWH, 1959. Presence of spermatozoa in the uterine-tube mucosa of bats. J Endocrinol 18: R7-R8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley MM, 1992. Darwin and domestication: studies on inheritance. J Hist Biol 25: 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson W, 1906. The progress of genetic research. In: Scientific papers of William Bateson (edited by Punnett, R. C.), 1928, 2: 142–151.

  • Bateson W, 1910. Heredity and variation in modern lights. In: Darwin and modern science. Cambridge University Press: 84–101.

  • Beardmore JA, Lints FA, Al-Baldawi ALF, 1975. Parental age and heritability of sternopleural chaeta number inDrosophila melanogaster. Heredity 34: 71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belyaev DK, Ruvinsky AO, Borodin PM, 1981. Inheritance of alternative states of the fused gene in mice. J Hered 72: 107–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bulant C, Gallais A, 1998. Xenia effects in maize with normal endosperm: I. Importance and stability. Crop Sci 38: 1517–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting J, 1974. Charles Darwin. Bailey Brothers & Swinfen LTD: 114.

  • Burbank L, 1927. The harvest of the years. Boston & New York: Hoghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox CF, 1909. Charles Darwin and the mutation theory. Am Nat 43: 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C, 1872. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 6th ed. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C, 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C, 1987. Charles Darwin’s notebook, 1836–1844. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport CB, 1933. An alleged case of inheritance of acquired characters. Am Nat 67: 549–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denney JO, 1992. Xenia includes metaxenia. Hort Science 27: 722–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, 1910. Intracellular Pangenesis. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co. (translated from the German by C. Stuart Gager): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, 1911. The mutation theory. London: Kegan

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul and Co. Duc G, Moessner A, Moussy F, Mousset-Declas C, 2001. A xenia effect on number and volume of cotyledon cells and on seed weight in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Euphytica 117: 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC, 1973. Xenia and the origin of genetics. Proc Am Philos Soc 117: 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endersby J, 2003. Darwin on generation, pangenesis and sexual selection. In: Hodge J, Radick G, eds. The Cambridge companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press, 69–91.

  • Engel ML, Chaboud A, Dumas C, MCormick S, 2003. Sperm cells ofZea mays have a complex complement of mRNAs. Plant J 34: 697–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel R, 1956. Graft-induced transmission to progeny of cytoplasmic male sterility inPetunia. Science 124: 684–685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galton F, 1871. Experiments in Pangenesis, by breeding from rabbits of a pure variety, into whose circulation blood taken from other varieties had previously been largely transfused. Proc R Soc Lond 19: 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT, 1975. The rationale of Pangenesis, Genetics 79: 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorcynski RM, Kennedy M, Macrae S, Ciampi A, 1983. A possible maternal effect in the abnormal hyporesponsiveness to specific alloantigens in offspring born to neonatally tolerant fathers. J Immunol 131: 1115–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK, 1995. Atavisms and atavistic mutations. Nat Genet 10: 126–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond J, 1958. Darwin and animal breeding. In: Barnet A, ed. A Century of Darwin. London: Heinemann: 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui L, 1989. Why does my newborn daughter resemble my former husband?Family (9): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman OE, 1991. The inheritance of acquired characteristics. Annu Rev Genet 25: 1–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, 2005. Reversion: going back to Darwin’s works. Trends Plant Sci 10: 459–460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, 2006. The historical and modern genetics of plant graft hybridization. Adv Genet 56: 101–129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, 2007. Like father like son: a fresh review of the inheritance of acquired characters. EMBO Rep 8: 798–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, 2008a. A new perspective on Darwin’s Pangenesis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 83: 141–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, 2008b. A novel mechanism for xenia?HortScience 43: 706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizana GB, Prado JAS, 1994. Effects of parents’ age on the level of polymorphism at the Adh locus inDrosophila melanogaster: I. Effects on the genic and genotypic segregation of the offspring. J Hered 85: 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lolle SJ, Victor JL, Young JM, Pruitt RE, 2005. Genome-wide non-Mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic in formation inArabidopsis. Nature 434: 505–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas WJ, Yoo B-C, Kragler F, 2001. RNA as a long-distance information macromolecule in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 849–857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E, 1991. One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei D, 2000. The son who resembles his mother’s former husband. Healthy Life 11: 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michurin IV, 1949. Selected Works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mole, 2006. How we know I: strange dreams. J Cell Sci 119: 1–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JA, 1963. Heredity and development. New York: Oxford University Press: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntzing A, 1959. Darwin’s views on variation under domestication in the light of present-day knowledge. Proc Am Philos Soc 103: 190–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, 1991. Graft-transformation, the mechanism for graft-induced genetic changes in higher plants. Euphytica 55: 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahlavani, MH, Abolhasani K, 2006. Xenia effect on seed and embryo size in cotton. J Appl Genet 47: 331–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sopikov PM, 1954. Changes in heredity by the parenteral administration of blood. Agrobiologiia 6: 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele EJ, Lindley RA, Blanden RV, 1998. Lamarck’s signature: how retrogenes are changing Darwin’s natural selection paradigm. Massachusetts: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegemann S, Bock R, 2009. Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts. Science 324: 649–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroun M, Anker P, 2005. Circulating DNA in higher organisms cancer detection brings back to life an ignored phenomenon. Cell Mol Biol 51: 767–774.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant AH, 1965. A history of genetics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taller J, Yagishita N, Hirata Y, 1999. Graft-induced variants as a source of novel characteristics in the breeding of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Euphytica 108: 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchang TR, Shi XB, Pang YB, 1964. An induced monster ciliate transmitted through three hundred and more generations. Sci Sin 13: 850–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace HM, Lee LS, 1999. Pollen source, fruit set and xenia in mandarins. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74: 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann A, 1904. The evolution theory. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther RG, 2000. Darwin on variation and heredity. J Hist Biol 33: 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. -S. Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y.S., Zhou, X.M., Zhi, M.X. et al. Darwin’s contributions to genetics. J Appl Genet 50, 177–184 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195671

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195671

Keywords

Navigation