Abstract
We continue here the line of investigation begun in [7], where we showed that on every Banach spaceX=l 1⊗W (whereW is separable) there is an operatorT with no nontrivial invariant subspaces. Here, we work on the same class of Banach spaces, and produce operators which not only have no invariant subspaces, but are also hypercyclic. This means that for every nonzero vectorx inX, the translatesT r x (r=1, 2, 3,...) are dense inX. This is an interesting result even if stated in a form which disregards the linearity ofT: it tells us that there is a continuous map ofX{0\{ into itself such that the orbit {T rx :r≧0{ of anyx teX \{0\{ is dense inX \{0\{. The methods used to construct the new operatorT are similar to those in [7], but we need to have somewhat greater complexity in order to obtain a hypercyclic operator.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. Beauzamy,Operators without invariant subspaces, simplification of a result of P. Enflo, J. Integral Equations and Operator Theory, January 1985.
P. Enflo,On the invariant subspace problem for Banach spaces, Acta Math.158 (1987), 212–313.
R. Ovsepian and A. Pelcynski,The existence in every separable Banach space of a fundamental and total bounded biorthogonal sequence and related constructions of uniformly bounded orthonormal systems in L, Studia Math.54 (1975), 149–159.
C. J. Read,A solution to the invariant subspace problem, Bull. London Math. Soc.16 (1984), 337–401.
C. J. Read,A solution to the invariant subspace problem on the space l 1, Bull. London Math. Soc.17 (1985), 305–317.
C. J. Read,A short proof concerning the invariant subspace problem, J. London Math. Soc. (2)33 (1986), 335–348.
C. J. Read,The invariant subspace problem on a class of nonreflexive Banach spaces, Israel Seminar on Geometrical Aspects of Functional Analysis, to appear.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Read, C.J. The invariant subspace problem for a class of Banach spaces, 2: Hypercyclic operators. Israel J. Math. 63, 1–40 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765019
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765019