Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive strategies of the orang-utan: New data and a reconsideration of existing sociosexual models

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent field data indicate that MacKinnon’s model of the orang-utan’s sexual and agonistic activity needs to be revised. In this model, male reproductive activity is concentrated in an extended phase of subadulthood and in early adulthood. According to this model, the role of older adult males is primarily that of range guardian, and in that role they would ensure that the offspring they had generated earlier would have safe access to food resources. This study presents cases suggesting that subadult males, even though sexually active, may have low reproductive success. In previous studies adult males were shown to display less sexual initiative than subadult males. In this study an adult male was at times involved infrequent mating activity in response to proceptive activity of females in the course of consortship. This adult male proved to be a successful breeder, thus refuting the hypothesis of adult male sterility. The female is most likely to conceive through cooperative mating in lengthy consortships with the dominant resident adult male. We hypothesize that the extended subadult phase represents a submissive strategy, allowing subadult males to remain in the home range of adult males but with minimal reproductive success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, S. A., and Altmann, J. (1980).Baboon Ecology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulmann, G. (1932). Geglückte Nachzucht eines Orang-Utan im Uüsseldorfer Zoo.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 5: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, G. (1929). Die Backenwülste des Orang-Mannes.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 1: 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, G. (1931). Wie alt wird der Orang-utan?Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 4: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, G. (1931b). Das Wachst um der Menschenaffen im Vergleich zu dem des Menschen in Kurven dargestelt.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 4: 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, G. (1939).Buschi. Vom Orang-SÄugling zum Backen wülster, Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N. (1979). The evolution of concealed ovulation.Am. Nat. 114: 835–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H., and Rudder, B. (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates.Nature (London) 269: 797–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. H. (1972). Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 231–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. H., and Gartlan, J. S. (1966). Evolution of primate societies.Nature (London) 210: 1200–1203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devore, I., and Washburn, S. L. (1963). Baboon ecology and human evolution. In Howell, F. C., and Bourlière, F. (eds.),African Ecology and Human Evolution, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 335–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, R. B. (1975). The relative body weight of Bornean and Sumatran orangutans.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 42: 349–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197: 215–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. (1978).Orangutan Adaptation at Tanjung Puling Reserve, Central Borneo, Ph.D. dissertation,’University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. (1979). Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve: Mating and ecology. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Part, Calif., pp. 194–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. (1981). Orangutan reproduction in the wild. In Graham, C. E. (ed.),Reproductive Biology of the Great Apes: Biomedical and Comparative Perspectives, Academic Press, New York, pp. 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J., Bandora, A., Bergmann, E., Busse, C., Matama, H., Mpongo, E., Pierce, A., and Riss, D. (1979). Intercommunity interactions in the chimpanzee population of the Gombe National Park. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Part, Calif., pp. 13–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horr, D. A. (1972). The Borneo orang-utan. Population structure and dynamics in relationship to ecology and reproductive strategy. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists.

  • Horr, D. A. (1975). The Borneo orang-utan: Population structure and dynamics in relationship to ecology and reproductive strategy. In Rosenblum, L. A. (ed.),Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horr, D. A. (1977). Orang-utan maturation: Growing up in a female world. In Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S., and Poirier, F. E. (eds.),Primate Bio-Social Development: Biological, Social and Ecological Determinants, Garland, New York, pp. 289–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A. (1972).The Evolution of Primate Behavior, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. L. (1968). Longevity of primates in captivity.Int. Zoo. Yb. 8: 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. L. (1976). Fact sheet on Orang Utans in captivity (Pongo pygmaeus).Am. Assoc. Zool. Parks Aquar. Newslett. 14.

  • Leutenegger, W. (1978). Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body size and breeding system in primates.Nature (London) 272: 610–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., and Kelly, J. T. (1977). Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid apes.Primates 18: 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. R. (1971). The orang-utan in Sabah today.Oryx XI(2-3): 141–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. R. (1974). The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus).Anim. Behav. 22: 3–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. R. (1979). Reproductive behavior in wild orangutan populations. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif. pp. 256–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1972). Sexual selection and natural selection. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, R. D. (1981). Laboratory research on sexual behavior of the great apes. In Graham, C. E. (ed.),Reproductive Biology of the Great Apes: Biomedical and Comparative Perspectives, Academic Press, New York, pp. 191–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, A. (1979). Intercommunity transfer of chimpanzees in Gombe National Part. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif, pp. 464–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksen, H. D. (1978).A Field Study on Summatran Orang Utans (Pongo pygmaeus abeliiLesson 1827). Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation, Ph.D. dissertation, Agricultural University, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S. (1973). Population composition and adaptive organization among orang-utans of the Kutai Reserve. In Michael, R. P., and Crook, J. H. (eds.),Comparative Ecology and Behaviour of Primates, Academic Press, London, pp. 171–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S. (1979). Individual activity patterns and the solitary nature of orangutans. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif., pp. 234–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann, C. L. (1981). Courtship and mating behavior of wild orangutans in Sumatra. In Chiarelli, A. B., and Corruccini, R. S. (eds.),Primate Behavior and Sociobiology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann, C. L. (1982). Mating behaviour of wild orang utans. In de Boer, L. E. M. (ed.),Biology and Conservation of the Orang Utan, Junk, The Hague, pp. 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, A. (1969a). Einige Feststellungen zur Pflege und Aufzucht von Orang-Utans,Pongo pygmaeus Hoppius 1763.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 36: 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, A. (1969). Notes on the body weights of new-born and young orang-utans.Int. Zoo Yb. 9: 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, C. E. G. (1980). Reproductive behaviour of wild chimpanzees in the Gombe National Part, Tanzania.J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 28: 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, F. A. (1958). Rusty becomes a backenwulster.Am. First Zoo Philadelphia Zool. Gard. 10(2).

  • van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1981). Inleiding in de evolutionaire verklaring van sociaal gedrag. In de Waal, F. B. M. (ed.),Sociobiologie ter Discussie, Boon, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht, pp. 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems.Behaviour 85(1–2): 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975).Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Belknap Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schürmann, C.L., van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. Reproductive strategies of the orang-utan: New data and a reconsideration of existing sociosexual models. Int J Primatol 7, 265–287 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736392

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736392

Key words

Navigation