Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why the scientific revolution did not take place in China — or did it?

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this study of early Chinese scientific thought and practice, the author examines the manner in which Chinese scientific and technical studies related to the rest of their thought, and how this impaired the mathematization of hypotheses about Nature, and therefore, the development of modern science in China. Taking as a starting point his study of the works of Shen Kua (1031–1095), the author, through a thorough-going critique of previous work on the Scientific Revolution problem which exposes its assumptions, fallacies and inadequacies, suggests that the initial heuristic question of the title has served its purpose and considers some of the factors that would need to be explored before a comparative history of scientific development can become a possibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1971)The Social Construction of Reality. A treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth, England, pp. 110–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodde, D. (1936) The Attitude toward Science and Scientific Method in Ancient China.Tien Hsia Monthly, 2, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. C. (1980) Science and the Arts in the Renaissance: The Search for Truth and Certainty, Old and New.History of Science, 18, 233–246 (esp. p. 235).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubs, H. H. (1929) The Failure of the Chinese to Produce Philosophical Systems.Toung Pao, 26, 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. (1957) The Political Function of Astronomy and Astronomers in Han China. In: J. K. Fairbank (ed.)Chinese Thought and Institutions. Chicago, pp. 33–70, 345–352 (esp. p. 66).

  • Elman, B. (1980) The Unravelling of Neo-Confucianism: The Lower Yangtze Academic Community in Late Imperial China, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (UM 8107740).

  • Freidson, E. (1970)Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York (esp. pp. 23–46).

  • Gellner, E. (1974)Legitimation of Belief. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P. Y. (1972) The System of the Book of Changes and Chinese Science.Japanese Studies in the History of Science, 11, 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jen Hung-chün (1915) The reason for China's lack of science.K'o-hsueh, 1, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. (1950) Foreward toThe I Ching or Book of Changes (translated by R. Wilhelm and C. F. Baynes). Bollingen Series, XIX, Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. R. (1958)Confucian China and its Modern Fate. The Problem of Intellectual Continuity. London, pp. 3–14.

  • Masayoshi Sugimoto and Swain, D. L. (1978)Science and Culture in Traditional Japan. A.D. 600-1854. Cambridge, MA, ch. 5.

  • Miyasita, S. (1976) Su Sung. In: Herbert Franke (ed.)Sung Biographies, III. 3 vols, Wiesbaden. pp. 969–970.

  • Mungello, D. E. (1972) On the Significance of the Question ‘Did China have Science’.Philosophy East and West, 22, 467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphey, R. (1947) The Nondevelopment of Science in Traditional China.Papers on China, 1, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A. (1978)Reason and Society in the Middle Ages, Oxford, pp. 282–314.

  • Needham, J. (1969)The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West, University of Toronto Press, pp. 16 and 190.

  • Needham, J. (1974)Science and Civilisation in China, 5, 2: Spagyrical Discovery and Invention: Magisteries of Gold and Immorality, Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–27.

  • Nishijima Sadao (1966)Chügoku keizaishi kenkyü (Studies in Chinese Economic History), Tokyo, pp. 3–4.

  • Shigeru Nakayama (1977)Characteristics of Scientific Development in Japan, New Delhi, pp. 20–23.

  • Sivin, N. (1973)Philosophy East and West, 23, 413–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng Kuang-ming and Wang Chen-to (1959) Su Sung. In: Institute for the History of Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ed.),Chung-kuo ku-tai k'o-hsueh-chia (Ancient Chinese Scientists). Beijing, pp. 123–124.

  • Thackray, A. (1974) Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model.The American Historical Review, 79, 672–709 (esp. p. 692).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Chin-kuang (1979)Hang-chou ta-hsueh hsueh-pao 3, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1977)Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA.

  • Ya-Ian Fung (1922) Why China Has No Science-An Interpretation of the History and Consequences of Chinese Philosophy.The International Journal of Ethics, 32, 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshio Mikami (1928) The Ch'ou-Jen Chuan of Yüan Yüan.Isis, 11, 125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

    Nathan Sivin

Authors
  1. Nathan Sivin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dr N. Sivin is Professor of both Chinese Culture and the History of Science at the University of Pennsylvania. Much of the substance of this paper was given at a recent Edward H. Hume Lecture at Yale University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sivin, N. Why the scientific revolution did not take place in China — or did it?. Environmentalist 5, 39–50 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239866

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239866

Keywords

Search

Navigation