Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms for cytoprotection by vitamin U from ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats

  • Esophageal, Gastric, and Duodenal Disorders
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparison was made of the effects of a nonsulfhydryl compound, vitamin U (methylme-thioninesulfonium chloride, MMSC), and a sulfhydryl compound, cysteine (Cys), with regard to the inducement of acute gastric mucosal damage in the presence and absence ofN-ethylmaleimide (NEM), a sulfhydryl-blocking reagent. The effects of MMSC, Cys, or NEM on gastric mucin content were examined using a newly developed biochemical method. MMSC and Cys inhibited mucosal damage due to 50% ethanol. The preinjection of NEM had no effect on cytoprotection of prostaglandins, but prevented the effects of Cys and MMSC. MMSC and Cys increased surface mucin content but lessened that of deep mucin. NEM decreased surface mucin and increased deep mucin. It thus follows that sulfhydryl compounds accelerate the secretion of deep mucin and accumulate surface mucin. The cytoprotective mechanism of MMSC may thus be mediated by sulfhydryl compounds, and the increase in surface mucosal mucin may possibly be related to cytoprotection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salim AS: Sulfhydryls protect patients against complications of crosive gastritis. Dig Dis Sci 35:1436–1438, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salim AS: Sulfhydryl-containing agents stimulate the healing of duodenal ulceration in man. Pharmacology 45:170–180, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salim AS: Sulfhydryl-containing agents: A new approach to the problem of refractory peptic ulceration. Pharmacology 45:301–306, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salim AS: Sulfhydryl-containing agents and the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse. Pharmacology 46:281–288, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salim AS: Administration of sulfhydryls to stimulate the healing of ischemia-induced acute gastric mucosal injury in the rat. J Pharm Sci 80:539–541, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. Salim AS: Role of sulfhydryl-containing agents in the healing or crosive gastritis and chronic gastric ulceration in the rat. J Pharm Sci 81:70–73, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  7. Salim AS: Protection against chronic ulceration in the rat with sulfhydryl-containing agents. J Pharm Sci 81:698–700, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salim AS: Role of oxygen-derived free radicals in mechanism of acute and chronic duodenal ulceration in the rat. Dig Dis Sci 35:73–79, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro SK: Biosynthesis of methionine from homocysteine ands-methylmethionine in bacteria. J Bacteriol 72:730–735, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  10. Szabo S: Sulfhydryl compounds may mediate gastric cytoprotection, Science 214:200–202, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salim AS: Gastric mucosal cytoprotection in the rat by cysteine. J Pharm Pharmacol 39:553–555, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konturek SJ, Brzozowski T, Piastucki I, Radecki T, Dupuy Damina, Szabo S: Gastric mucosal protection by agents altering gastric mucosal sulfhydryls. Digestion 37:65–71, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takeuchi K, Okada M, Niida H, Okabe S: Role of sulfhydryls in mucosal injury caused by ethanol: relation to microvascular permeability, gastric motility and cytoprotection. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 248:836–841, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romano M, Razandi M, Raza A, Szabo S, Ivey J: Cysteamine protects gastric epithelial cell monolayers against drug induced damage: Evidence for direct cellular protection by sulfhydryl compounds. Gut 33:30–38, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loguercio C, Taranto D, Beneduce F, Vecchio Blanco C, Vincentiis A, Nardi G, Romano M: Glutahione prevents ethanol induced gastric mucosal damage and depletion of sulfhydryl compounds in humans. Gut 34:161–165, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lamont JT, Ventola AS, Maull EA, Szabo S: Cysteamine and prostaglandin F2β stimulate rat gastric mucin release. Gastroenterology 84:306–313, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hollander F: The two-component mucous barrier: Its activity in protecting the gastroduodenal mucosa against peptic ulceration. Arch Intern Med 93:107–120, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  18. Komuro Y, Ishihara K, Ishii K, Ota H, Katsuyama T, Saigenji K, Hotta K: A separating method for quantifying mucus glycoprotein localized in the different layer of rat gastric mucosa. Gastroenterol Jpn 27:466–472, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ohara S, Ishihara K, Hotta K: Comparative study on mucus glycoproteins in rat stomach and duodenum. Comp Biochem Physiol 83B:273–275, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F: Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ohara S, Ishihara K, Hotta K: Two types of rat gastric mucus glycoprotein subunits. J Biochem 103:1050–1053, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kosower NS, Kosower EM: The glutathione status of cells. Int Rev Cytol 54:109–160, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  23. Forstner JF, Forstner GG: Gastrointestinal mucus.In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. 3rd ed. LR Johnson (ed.) New York. Raven Press, 1994, pp 1255–1283

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hiraishi H, Terano A, Ota S, Mutoh H, Sugimoto T, Harada T, Razandil M, Ivey KJ: Protection of cultured rat gastric cells against oxidant-induced damage by exogenous glutathione. Gastroenterology 106:1199–1207, 1994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, T., Ohara, S., Ichikawa, T. et al. Mechanisms for cytoprotection by vitamin U from ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Digest Dis Sci 41, 49–54 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208583

Key Words

Navigation