Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in sexuality among medical students: Effects of increasing socioeconomic status

Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has consistently shown that, compared to men, women are more cautious and selective and maintain greater marital aspirations in entering and maintaining sexual relationships. One explanation of this sex difference is that women have traditionally had inferior access to earning power and social status and consequently were forced to acquire socioeconomic status (SES) through their choice of marriage partners. A contrasting view is that this difference is a component of the basic sex difference identified in the Kinsey studies: Men are more likely than women to dissociate coitus from emotional attachment and to desire and seek coitus with a variety of partners. These two explanations were explored in open-ended interviews with matched samples of 20 male and 20 female medical students. The results were more consistent with the perspective of basic sex differences than with the differential resources explanation. Increasing female SES does not appear to eliminate or even substantially reduce this sex difference. Increasing SES tends to enlarge the pool of acceptable, available sexual and marital partners for men while it tends to reduce the pool for women. Increasing SES thus tends to have different effects on men and women and may cause sex differences in the tendency to associate coitus with emotional attachments and marital aspirations to be more, rather than less, apparent. Extensive case data with verbatim quotations are presented to reveal the emotions and desires underlying subjects' overt behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alzate, H. (1984). Sexual behavior of unmarried Columbian University Students: A five-year follow-up.Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 121–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P., and Weinberg, M. S. (1978).Homosexualities Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P. (1983).American Couples Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, I. D. (1975). A comparison of men's and women's intergenerational mobility in the United States.Amer, Sociol. Rev. 40: 483–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, U., Schmidt, G., and Kruse, M. (1984). Changes in sex differences in sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 99–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, N. W., Field, J. K., and Quadagno, D. (1984). Sex differences in sexual needs and desires.Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 233–245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. L., and Dion, K. K. (1973). Correlates of romantic love.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 4: 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. L., and Dion, K. K. (1976). Love, liking, and trust in heterosexual relationships.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2: 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. N., and Booth, A. (1976). Sexual behavior in and out of marriage.J. Marr. Fam. 38: 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt, A. (1985). The psychobiology of gender. In Rossi, A. (ed.),Gender and the Life Course Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. (1969). Appearance and education in marriage mobility.Amer. Sociol. Rev. 34: 519–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, N., Westoff, C., and Hammerslough, C. (1984). Demography of the marriage market in the United States.Population Index 50: 5–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1959). The theoretical importance of love.Amer. Sociol. Rev. 24: 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1979). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. In Levinger, G., and Moles, O. C. (eds.),Divorce and Separation Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1976).The Hite Report: A Nationwide Study of Female Sexuality Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht, S. K., and Spanier, G. B. (1980). Marital disruption and higher education among women in the United States.Sociol. Quart. 21: 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J., Davidson, K. R., and Scheck, S. R. (1970). A research note on male-female differentials in the experience of heterosexual love.J. Sex Res. 6: 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoth, R., Boyd, K., and Singer, B. (in press). Empirical tests of sexual selection theory.J. Sex. Res.

  • Lewin, B. (1982). The adolescent boy and girl: First and other early experiences with intercourse from a representative sample of Swedish school adolescents.Arch. Sex. Behav. 11: 417–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1961). Sex hormones and other variables in human eroticism. In Young, W. C., and Corner, G. W. (eds.),Sex and Internal Secretions, Vol. 2, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1965). Influence of hormones on sexual behavior.Ann. Rev. Med. 16: 67–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. W., and Pope, H. (1980). Divorce and female remarriage mobility.Soc. Forces 58: 726–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. (1980). Mate selection in the 1970's.J. Marr. Fam. 42: 777–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persky, H., Lief, H. I., Strauss, D., Miller, W. R., and O'Brien, C. P. (1978). Plasma testosterone level and sexual behavior of couples.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 157–168.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, W. B. (1972).Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1983).Intimate Strangers Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoof-Tams, K., Schlaegel, J., and Malczak, L. (1976). Differentiation of sexual morality between 11 and 16 years.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 353–370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B. (1985a). A comparison of evolutionary and environmental theories of erotic response, Part I.J. Sex Res. 21: 229–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B. (1985b). A comparison of evolutionary and environmental theories of erotic response, Part II.J. Sex Res. 21: 345–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Formal and informal sex education as determinants of premarital sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 39–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979).Evolution of Human Sexuality Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, C. A. (1975).The Homosexual Matrix Signet, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (1977). The importance of being beautiful.Amer. J. Sociol. 83: 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, R., Deven, F. R., and Coleman, S. J. (1982). Cross-national comparison of the relative influence of male and female age on the frequency of marital intercourse.J. Biosoc. Sci. 14: 1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1938).The Family Dryden, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Townsend, J.M. Sex differences in sexuality among medical students: Effects of increasing socioeconomic status. Arch Sex Behav 16, 425–444 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541424

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541424

Key words

Navigation