Abstract
We study the relationships between weakened forms of the Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle (KW), the Axiom of Choice (AC), and the Axiom of Multiple Choice (MC).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blass, A.: Ramsey's theorem in the hierarchy of choice principles. J. Symbolic Logic42, 387–390 (1977).
Blass, A.: Injectivity, projectivity and the axiom of choice. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.255, 31–59 (1979).
Bleicher, M.: Multiple choice axioms and the axiom of choice for finite sets. Fund. Math.57, 247–252 (1965).
Brunner, N.: Dedekind-Endlichkeit und Wohlordenbarkeit. Mh. Math.94, 9–31 (1982).
Brunner, N.: Positive functionals and the axiom of choice. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova72, 9–12 (1984).
Brunner, N.: The Fraenkel-Mostowski method, revisited. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic31, 64–75 (1990).
Cohen, P. J.: Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York: Benjamin. 1966.
Feferman, S.: Applications of forcing and generic sets. Fund. Math.56, 325–345 (1965).
Felgner, U., Jech, T.: Variants of the axiom of choice in set theory with atoms. Fund. Math.79, 79–85 (1973).
Halpern, J., Levy, A.: The Boolean prime ideal theorem does not imply the axiom of choice. In: Axiomatic Set Theory. Proc. Symp. Pure Math (D. Scott ed.)13, 83–134 (1971).
Howard, P.: Limitations of the Fraenkel-Mostowski method of independence proofs. J. Symbolic Logic38, 416–422 (1973).
Howard, P.: Binary consistent choice on pairs and a generalization of König's infinity lemma. Fund. Math.121, 17–31 (1984).
Howard, P., Rubin, H., Rubin, J.: The relationship between two weak forms of the axiom of choice. Fund. Math.80, 75–79 (1973).
Howard P., Rubin, J.: The axiom of choice for well ordered families and for families of well orderable sets. J. Symbolic Logic.60, 1115–1117 (1995).
Jech, T.: The Axiom of Choice. Amsterdam: North Holland. 1973.
Jech, T., Sochor, A.: Applications of the Θ-model. Bull. de l'Acad. Pol. Sci.14, 297–303, 351–355 (1966).
Keremedis, K.: Bases for vector spaces over the two element field and the axiom of choice. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.124, 2527–2531 (1996).
Keremedis, K.: Disasters in topology without the axiom of choice. Preprint (1995).
Kinna, W., Wagner, K.: Über eine Abschwächung des Auswahlpostulates. Fund. Math.42, 75–82 (1955).
Läuchli, H.: The independence of the ordering principle from a restricted axiom of choice. Fund. Math.54, 31–43 (1964).
Levy, A.: Axioms of multiple choice. Fund. Math.50, 475–483 (1962).
Mostowski, A.: Über die Unabhängigkeit des Wohlordnungssatzes vom Ordnungsprinzip. Fund. Math.32, 201–252 (1939).
Pincus, D.: Support structures for the axiom of choice. J. Symbolic Logic36, 28–38 (1971).
Pincus, D.: Zermelo-Fraenkel consistency results by Fraenkel-Mostowski methods. J. Symbolic Logic37, 721–743 (1972).
Pincus, D.: Cardinal representatives. Israel J. Math. Logic18, 321–344 (1974).
Pincus, D.: Adding dependent choice. Ann. Math. Logic11, 105–145 (1977).
Pincus, D.: A note on the cardinal factorial. Fund. Math.98, 21–24 (1978).
Rubin, H.: Two propositions equivalent to the axiom of choice only under the axioms of extensionality and regularity. Notices7, 381 (1960).
Sageev, G.: An independence result concerning the axiom of choice. Ann. Math. Logic8, 1–184 (1975).
Truss, J.: The axiom of choice for linearly ordered families. Fund. Math.99, 133–139 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howard, P., Rubin, A.L. & Rubin, J.E. Kinna-Wagner selection principles, axioms of choice and multiple choice. Monatshefte für Mathematik 123, 309–319 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326766
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326766