Skip to main content
Log in

Intraspecific classification of melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cucumis melo L. (melon) genotypes differ widely in morphological and biochemical traits. Intraspecific classification of such variability has been difficult, and most taxonomists still rely on the work of Naudin (1859). A collection of 54 accessions representing diverse genotypes from 23 countries was surveyed. Morphological traits related to the vegetative and flowering stages and mature fruit morphology and quality parameters, e.g., taste, aroma, sugar composition and pH, were scored. These were used to construct a “botanical-morphological” dendrogram that generally reflected the classification ofCucumis melo into several horticultural varieties. DNA polymorphism among the accessions was assessed using the Inter-SSR-PCR and RAPD techniques that detected abundant DNA polymorphism among melon genotypes. Cluster analysis indicated that the largest divergence was between North American and Europeancantalupensis andinodorus cultivars as one group, and the more “exotic” varieties:conomon, chito, dudaim, agrestis andmomordica, as a second group. The molecular phylogeny agreed, broadly, with the classification of melon into two subspecies, and did not contradict the division into “horticultural varieties”. It was apparent, however, that the infra-specific division is rather loose, molecular variation being distributed continuously between and within cultivar groups. We suggest that despite the morphological diversity, separation between varietal-groups may be based on a too small number of genes to enable unambiguous infra-specific classification based on DNA diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates D. M., Robinson R. W. (1995) Cucumbers, melons and watermelons. In: Smartt J., Simmonds N. W. (eds.) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific, Essex, pp. 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger S. L., Kimmel A. R. (1986) DNA fingerprinting by oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeats. Hum. Genet 74: 239–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campos L. P., Raelson J. V., Grant W. F. (1994) Genome relationships amongLotus species based on random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 417–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta S. L., Wood J., Hicks J. B. (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 1: 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquinas-Alcazar J. T., Gulik P. J. (1983) Genetic resources ofCucurbitaceae: a global report. IBPGR Secretariat, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, D. Q., Roose M. L. (1997) Identification of closely related citrus cultivars with inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 408–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J. (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), Version 3.5c, distributed by the author, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebenscikov I. (1953) Die Entwicklung der Melonsystematik. Kulturpflanze 1: 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta M., Chyi Y.-S., Romero-Severson J., Owen J. L. (1994) Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple-sequence repeats. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 998–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallden C., Hansen M., Nilsson N. O., Hjerdin A., Sall T. (1996) Competition as a source of errors in RAPD analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 1185–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer K., Hanelt P., Perrino P. (1986)Carosello and the taxonomy ofCucumis melo L. especially of its vegetable races. Kulturpflanzen 34: 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey B. K., Crowe K. R., Jones V. M., Polans N. O. (1996) A phylogenetic analysis ofPisum based on morphological characters, allozyme and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet 92: 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey C. (1980) A review of theCucurbitaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride J. H. (1993) Biosystematic monograph of the genusCucumis (Cucurbitaceae). Parkway Publishers, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S. J., Shin J. S., Park K. W., Hong Y. P. (1996) Detection of genetic diversity using RAPD-PCR and sugar analysis in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.) germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 719–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallick M. F. R., Masui M., 1986: Origin, distribution and taxonomy of melons. Scientia Hort. 28: 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millan T., Osuna F., Cobos S., Torres A. M., Cubero J. I. (1996) Using RAPDs to study phylogenetic relationships inRosa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger H. M., Robinson R. W. (1991) Nomenclature ofCucumis melo L. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Reports 14: 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudin C. V. (1859) Essais d'une monographie des espèces et des variétés du genreCucumis. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. sér. 4, 11: 5–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhausen S. L. (1992) Evaluation of restriction fragment length polymorphism inCucumis melo. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangalo K. J. (1929) Critical review of the main literature on the taxonomy, geography and origin of cultivated and partially wild melons. — Trudy Prikl. Bot. 23: 397–442 [In Russian, and translated into English for USDA by G. Saad in 1986].

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl-Treves R., Zamir D., Navot N., Galun E. (1985) Phylogeny ofCucumis based on isozyme variability and its comparison with plastome Phylogeny. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitrat M. (1991) Linkage groups inCucumis melo L. J. Hered. 82: 406–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schierwater B. (1995) Arbitrary amplified DNA in systematics and phylogenetics. Electrophoresis 16: 1643–1647.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein L., Kovalski I., Huang R., Anagnostou K., Kyle M. M., Perl-Treves R. (1999) Molecular variation inCucumis melo as revealed by RFLP and RAPD markers. Scientia Horticulturae 79: 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub J., Jeffrey B., Poetter K. (1996) Sources of potential errors in the application of random amplified polymorphic DNA in cucumber. HortScience 31: 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub J., Box J., Meglic V., Horejsi T. F., McCreight J. D. (1997) Comparison of isozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA data for determining intraspecific variation inCucumis. Genet Res. Crop Evol. 44: 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepansky A., Kovalski I., Schaffer A. A., Perl-Treves R. (1999) Variation in sugar levels and invertase activity in mature fruit representing a broad spectrum ofCucumis melo genotypes. Genet Res. Crop Evol. 46: 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford D. L. (1993) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1, Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Campaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virk P. S., Ford-Lloyd B. V., Jackson M. T., Newbury H. J. (1995) Use of RAPD for the study of diversity within plant germplasm collections. Heredity 74: 170–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walters T. W. (1989) Historical overview on domesticated plants in China with special emphasis on the Cucurbitaceae. Econ. Bot. 43: 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker T. W., Davis G. N. (1962) Cucurbits — botany, cultivation and utilization. London Leonard Hill Ltd., Interscience Publishers Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J. G. K., Hanafey M. K. Rafalsky J. A., Tingey S. V. (1993) Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Methods in Enzymology 218: 704–741.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zietkiewicz E., Rafalski A., Labuda D. (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchore PCR amplification. Genomics 20: 176–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stepansky, A., Kovalski, I. & Perl-Treves, R. Intraspecific classification of melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation. Pl Syst Evol 217, 313–332 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984373

Key words

Navigation