Abstract
The affinities ofCyclanthaceae are discussed, and it is concluded that the sister-group to this family is most probablyPandanaceae. A hypothesis of generic relationships inCyclanthaceae, based on cladistic methods, is presented. Bootstrap analysis and Bremer support (“decay” index) have been used to test the strength of individual clades, and the result is compared with previously made phylogenetic analyses. TheSphaeradenia group (Chorigyne, Stelestylis, Sphaeradenia, andLudovia) is supported as monophyletic and acceptably resolved, while theAsplundia group (remaining genera inCarludovicoideae) may be paraphyletic, with largely uncertain relationships. A formal recognition of these groups is therefore not justified. The probable character evolution inCarludovicoideae is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bremer, K., 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstructions. — Evolution42: 795–803.
Chase, M. V., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D, Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Hills, H. G., Qiu, Y-L., Kron, K. A., Rettig, J. H., Conti, E., Palmer, J. D., Manhart, J. R., Sytsma, K. J., Michaels, H. J., Kress, W. J., Karol, K. G., Clark, W. D., Hedrén, M., Gaut, B. S., Jansen, R. K., Kim, K-J., Wimpee, C. F., Smith, J. F., Furnier, G. R., Strauss, S. H., Xiang, Q-Y., Plunkett, G. M., Soltis, P. S., Swensen, S. M., Williams, S. E., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J., Eguiarte, L. E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G. H., Graham, S. W., Barrett, S. C. H., Dayanandan, S., Albert, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.
Collinson, J. A., 1990: Plant evolution and ecology during the early Cainozoic diversification. — Adv. Bot. Res.17: 27–95.
Dahlgren, R. M. T., Clifford, H. T., Yeo, P. F., 1985: The families of the monocotyledons. Structure, evolution, and taxonomy. — Berlin: Springer.
Donoghue, M. J., Olmstead, R. G., Smith, J. F., Palmer, J. D., 1992: Phylogenetic relationships ofDipsacales based onrbc L sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 333–345.
Dransfield, J., Ferguson, I. K., Uhl, N. W., 1990: The coryphoid palms: patterns of variation and evolution. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.77: 802–815.
Duvall, M. R., Clegg, M. T., Chase, M. W., Clark, W. D., Kress, W. J., Hills, H. G., Eguiarte, L. E., Smith, J. F., Gaut, B. S., Zimmer, E. A., Learn, G. H., 1993: Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed fromrbc L sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 607–619.
Eriksson, R., 1989:Chorigyne, a new genus of theCyclanthaceae from Central America. — Nordic J. Bot.9: 31–45.
—, 1993: The rise and fall ofPseudoludovia andreana (Cyclanthaceae). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 458–460.
—, 1994: The remarkable weevil pollination of the neotropicalCarludovicoideae (Cyclanthaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.189: 75–81.
Farris, J. S., 1969: A successive approximations approach to character weighting. — Syst. Zool.18: 374–385.
—, 1989: The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. — Cladistics5: 417–419.
Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.
French, J. C., Tomlinson, P. B., 1986: Compound vascular bundles in monocotyledonous stems: construction and significance. — Kew Bull.41: 561–574.
—, 1983: Vascular patterns in stems of theCyclanthaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.70: 1386–1400.
Galeano-Garcés, G., Bernal-Gonzalez, R., 1984: NuevasCyclanthaceae de Colombia. — Caldasia14: 27–35.
Gottsberger, G., 1991: Pollination of some species of theCarludovicoideae, and remarks on the origin and evolution of theCyclanthaceae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.113: 221–235.
Grayum, M. H., Hammel, B. E., 1982: Three new species ofCyclanthaceae from the Caribbean lowlands of Costa Rica. — Syst. Bot.7: 221–229.
Hammel, B. E., 1986a: Notes on theCyclanthaceae of southern Central America including three new species. — Phytologia60: 5–15.
—, 1986b: The vascular flora of La Selva biological station, Costa Rica. — Selbyana9: 196–202.
—, 1989:Dianthoveus, a new genus ofCyclanthaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.76: 112–123.
Harling, G., 1958: Monograph of theCyclanthaceae. — Acta Horti Berg.18: 1–428, pls 1–110.
—, 1963: Notes on VenezuelanCyclanthaceae. — Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat.25: 59–69.
—, 1972:Cyclanthaceae. — In:Maguire, B., & al., (Eds): The Botany of the Guayana highlands. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.23: 107–114.
—, 1973: 216.Cyclanthaceae. — In:Harling, G., Sparre, B., (Eds): Flora of Ecuador. — Opera Bot., ser. B,1: 1–48.
Harris, P. J., Hartley, R. D., 1980: Phenolic constituents of the cell walls of monocotyledons. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.8: 153–160.
Källersjö, M., Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., Bult, C., 1992: Skewness and permutation. — Cladistics8: 275–287.
Nambudiri, E. M. V., Tidwell, W. D., 1978: On probable affinities ofViracarpon Sahnii from the Deccan Intertrappean flora of India. — Palaeontographica, Abt. B, Paläophytol.166: 30–43.
Sahni, B., 1944: Takli, near Nagpur. GenusViracarpon Sahnii. Paleobotany in India V. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India14: 80–82.
—, 1944a: On the structure and affinities ofPalmoxylon sahnii Rode. Paleobotany in India V. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India14: 67–91.
—, 1944b: A silicified member ofCyclanthaceae from the Tertiary of Deccan. — Nature154: 114.
—, 1950: The leaf ofCyclanthodendron sahnii. Paleobotany in India VII. — J. Indian Bot. Soc.29: 1–46.
—, 1953: On the structure and affinities ofCyclanthodendron sahnii (Rode)Sahni & Surange, from the Deccan Intertrappean Series. — Paleobotanist2: 93–100.
Schultes, R. E., 1959: Plantae Colombianae XV. — Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.18: 305–310.
Surange, K. R., 1949: A contribution to the morphology and anatomy of theCyclanthaceae. — Trans. Natl. Inst. Sci. India3: 159–209.
Swofford, D. L., 1991: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. — Illinois: Illinois Nat. Hist. Survey.
Thorne, R. F., 1983: Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 85–117.
Tomlinson, P. B., Wilder, G. J., 1984: Systematic anatomy ofCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae) — An overview. — Bot. Gaz.145: 535–549.
Trivedi, B. S., Verma, C. L., 1972: Silicified cyclanthaceous remains from the Deccan Intertrappean beds of Madhya Pradesh, India. — Curr. Sci.41: 29–30.
—, 1976:Cyclanthodendron remains from the Deccan Intertrappean beds of Madhya Pradesh, India. — Palaeobotanist25: 529–542.
Wilder, G. J., 1976: Structure and development of leaves inCarludovica palmata (Cyclanthaceae) with reference to otherCyclanthaceae andPalmae. — Amer. J. Bot.63: 1237–1256.
—, 1977a: Structure and symmetry of species of theAsplundia group (Cyclanthaceae) having monopodial vegetative axes:Schultesiophytum chorianthum, Dicranopygium sp. nov.,Asplundia rigida, andThoracocarpus bissectus. — Bot. Gaz.138: 80–101.
—, 1977b: Structure and symmetry of species of theAsplundia group (Cyclanthaceae) having sympodial vegetative axes:Evodianthus funifer andCarludovica palmata. — Bot. Gaz.138: 219–235.
—, 1978: Two new species and a new subgenus ofCyclanthaceae. — J. Arnold Arbor.59: 74–102.
—, 1979: Structure and symmetry of species of theSphaeradenia group (Cyclanthaceae):Stelestylis stylaris, Sphaeradenia woodsonii, andLudovia spp. — Bot. Gaz.140: 338–355.
—, 1981a: Structure and development ofCyclanthus bipartitus Poit. (Cyclanthaceae) with reference to otherCyclanthaceae. I. Rhizome, inflorescence, root, and symmetry. — Bot. Gaz.142: 96–114.
—, 1981b: Structure and development ofCyclanthus bipartitus Poit. (Cyclanthaceae) with reference to otherCyclanthaceae. II. Adult leaf. — Bot. Gaz.142: 222–236.
—, 1981c: Morphology of adult leaves in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). — Bot. Gaz.142: 564–588.
—, 1984: Anatomy of noncostal portions of lamina in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). V. Tables of data. — Bot. Mus. Leafl.30: 103–133.
—, 1985a: Anatomy of noncostal portions of lamina in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). I. Epidermis. — Bot. Gaz.146: 82–105.
—, 1985b: Anatomy of noncostal portions of lamina in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). II. Regions of mesophyll, monomorphic and dimorphic ordinary parenchyma cells, mesophyll fibers, and parenchyma-like dead cells. — Bot. Gaz.146: 213–231.
—, 1985c: Anatomy of noncostal portions of lamina in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). III. Crystal sacs, periderm, and boundary layers of the mesophyll. — Bot. Gaz.146: 375–394.
—, 1985d: Anatomy of noncostal portions of lamina in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). IV. Veins of interridge areas, expansion tissue, and adaxial and abaxial ridges. — Bot. Gaz.146: 545–563.
—, 1986a: Anatomy of first-order roots in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). I. Epidermis, cortex, and pericycle. — Canad. J. Bot.64: 2622–2644.
—, 1986b: Anatomy of first-order roots in theCyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). II. Stele (excluding pericycle). — Canad. J. Bot.64: 2848–2864.
—, 1987: Contributions to taxonomy and morphology ofSchultesiophytum chorianthum Harl. andDicranopygium mirabile Harl. (Cyclanthaceae). — Opera Bot.92: 277–291.
—, 1988: Inflorescence position as a taxonomic character in theCyclanthaceae. — Bot. Gaz.149: 110–115.
—, 1989a: Morphology ofDianthoveus cremnophilus (Cyclanthaceae). — Canad. J. Bot.67: 2450–2464.
—, 1989b: Anatomy ofDianthoveus cremnophilus (Cyclanthaceae). — Canad. J. Bot.67: 3580–3599.
—, 1992: Orthodistichous phyllotaxy and dorsiventral symmetry on adult shoots ofCyclanthus bipartitus (Cyclanthaceae, Monocotyledoneae). — Canad. J. Bot.70: 1388–1400.
—, 1982: Laticifers inCyclanthus bipartitus Poit. (Cyclanthaceae). — Bot. Gaz.143: 84–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eriksson, R. Phylogeny of theCyclanthaceae . Pl Syst Evol 190, 31–47 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937857
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937857