Abstract
“L’Action Française est née de l’Affaire Dreyfus”, wrote Léon de Montesquiou of the origins of the most resilient, if not the most controversial, political movement in contemporary France.1 Avowedly Catholic, royalist, and Ultranationalist, the Action Française has survived in turn the ban of the Papacy, the repudiation of the House of France, and the condemnation of its leader to national degradation for “intelligence with the enemy” during World War II. To be sure, after 1945 the movement represented little more than a shadow of its former self, and it took on all the aspects of “une chapelle”. Yet the flame continued to flicker, and in the late 1950’s the movement even showed signs of rejuvenation. The domestic career of the Action Française was a stormy one to say the least, and the second generation of Maurrassians has been true to its elders in this as in other ways. Under the Fourth Republic, Maurras’ heritage was bitterly fought over by two weeklies, Aspects de la France and La Nation Française.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. de Coudekerque-Lambrecht, Lion de Montesquiou: sa vie politique — L’Action Française (Paris, 1925), p. 28. For the important contributions of American scholars to the historiography of the Action Française, see the author’s “Charles Maurras et l’Action Française: Etat des Travaux Américains,” Revue Française de Science Politique, VIII (March, 1958).
Guy Chapman, The Dreyfus Case: A Reassessment (New York, 1955), p. 9.
D. W. Brogan, France Under the Republic (New York & London, 1940), p. 341.
When italicized Action Française refers to the daily as distinguished from the movement as a whole. All references to the review (semi-monthly until 1908; monthly 1908–1914) are made under the title Revue d’Action Française.
Edward R. Tannenbaum, The Action Française Before the First World War (Ms., University of Chicago Doctoral Dissertation, 1950), pp. 144–150. Cf. François Daudet’s eulogy of Pujo in Les Libertés Françaises, No. 3 (October, 1955); & Abel Manouvriez, “Maurice Pujo ou la fidélité,” Les Libertés Françaises, No. 4 (November, 1955). For biographical sketches of other Action Française leaders, see Professor Tannenbaum’s work, chapter V: “The Leadership of the Movement.”
Henri Vaugeois, La Fin de l’erreur Française (Paris, 1928), p. 292.
Louis Dimier, Vingt ans d’Action Française et autres souvenirs (Paris, 1926), p. 20.
Jean-Jacques Chevallier, Les Grandes oeuvres politiques: De Machiavel à nos jours (Paris, 1950) ; André Mirambel, La Comédie du Nationalisme Intégral (Paris, 1947).
Quoted in Pierre Brodin, Présences contemporaines (Paris, 1955), II, pp. 129–130. In praise of Maurras see Charles Maurras (1868–1852): Témoignages... (Paris, 1953); for a violent outburst against him see Ernest Renauld, L’Action Française contre l’Eglise Catholique et contre la Monarchie (Paris, 1936).
Au Signe de Flore (Paris, 1933), p. 1.
Michel Mourre, Charles Maurras (Paris, 1953), p. 128. For a thorough treatment of his intellectual formation: Léon S. Roudiez, Maurras jusqu’à l’Action Française (Paris, 1957).
The Félibrige was founded in 1854 by seven provençal poets. Its professed aim was to maintain the purety of the literary dialects of the Langue d’Oc.
Au Signe de Flore, pp. 43–49.
Pierre Chardon, ed., Dictionnaire politique et critique. 5 vs. (Paris, 1932–1934). Hereafter referred to as Dictionnaire. Unless otherwise indicated all quotations in the following exposition of Integral Nationalism are taken from Maurras’ writings.
Frank C. Huntington, The Ideology of the Action Française (Ms., Yale University Doctoral Dissertation, 1954), p. 86.
“Nous ne sommes pas un parti. Nous sommes le salut public,” Soleil, May 7, 1901.
Mes Idées politiques (Paris, 1937), p. 118.
Dictionnaire, III, p. 231.
Ibid., II, p. 274.
Ibid., II, p. 76.
Ibid., III, p. 202.
Ibid., II, pp. 13–14.
Maurras defined the “métèques” as “étrangers mal nés.” He often asserted that his attacks were directed against the Protestant and Jewish “Estates.” It was not impossible for individual Protestants, or even Jews, to become good Frenchmen.
Dictionnaire, II, pp. 10–11.
La Démocratie religieuse (Paris, 1921), p. 482.
Revue d’Action Française, XXIX (February ist, 1908), p. 211.
Idées politiques, pp. 277–288.
Dictionnaire, III, p. 91.
Idées politiques, p. 280
Quoted in Huntington, Ideology of Action Française, p. 84.
Dictionnaire, I, p. 354.
Ibid., II, p. 6.
“La France aux Français,” was one of the Action Française’s favorite slogans.
See Charles Maurras: Témoignages... for excellent photographs of Maurras and other Action Française personalities.
Maurras et notre temps (Paris, 1951), I, pp. 12–14. See also Tannenbaum, The Action Française, p. 134. The author can only concur with Tannenbaum’s estimate of Maurras’ personality.
Tragi-Comédie de ma surdité (Aix-en-Provence, 1951), p. 8.
Tannenbaum, The Action Française, p. 129.
Action Française, May 6, 1914.
“Des armes? J’ai mes poings;” quoted in Massis, Maurras, II, p. 31.
S.N., Dossier Maurras. In a report full of spelling mistakes, another inspector once amusingly accused Maurras of pretending to be deaf. On the whole, however, the agents detailed to the Action Française appear to have been a capable lot of men.
A.N. F712861.
Maurras, II, p. 18.
William C. Buthman, The Rise of Integral Nationalism in France (New York, 1939), p. 257.
Lazare de Gérin Ricard et Louis Truc, Histoire de l’Action Française (Paris, 1949), p. 44.
Revue d’Action Française, I (August 15, 1899), p. 93.
Buthman, Rise of Integral Nationalism, p. 257.
Text of letter can be found in Charles Maurras, Enquête sur la Monarchie (Definitive Edition) (Paris, 1925), pp. 105–106.
Buthman, Rise of Integral Nationalism, p. 257.
Revue d’Action Française ,V (November ist, 1901), pp. 671–699.
A.N. F712431.
In 1896, the Sûreté estimated that only 30 out of 87 regional royalist committees were functioning regularly, A.N. F712431.
Maurras to Buffet: “Vous m’avez éclairé sur le Monseigneur, le malheur est que cela est venu bien tard... Mais quand on lui dira Sire, le Monsieur sera oublié.. .”A.N. F712861.
Jean France, Ligues et complots: Trente ans à la rue des Saussaies (Paris, 1931), p. 77.
As a result of this letter, the Duc d’Orléans was forced to resign from a number of clubs in London. A.N. F712861.
Ibid.
La Monarchie Française: Lettres et documents politiques (1844–1907) (Paris, 1907), pp. i-xviii.
Ibid., p. 239.
A.N. F712861.
Monarchie Française, pp. 241–246.
Tannenbaum, The Action Française, p. 170.
Revue d’Action Française, V (July 15, 1901), p. 169.
A.N. F712431.
Testimony of an old Maurrassian (Paris, Summer, 1957).
“Il était devenu un mécontent... Je ne parlerai pas de ce qu’il éprouva, quand après la mort du Comte de Paris il sentit s’égarer et se perdre toutes les forces nécessaires à une monarchie parlementaire,” Auguste Laugel, “L’Expulsion des Princes,” Revue de Paris, CXCVI (Sept. 15, 1926), p. 351.
Brogan, France Under the Republic, p. 367.
Paul Dresse, Léon Daudet vivant (Paris, 1947), p. 36.
When the author met Madame Léon Daudet, in 1956, she was a very old lady who had lost sight in one eye. Although they are poles apart in their political beliefs, he would like to pay tribute to her broad erudition and still very alert intelligence.
Léon Daudet, Vers le Roi (Paris, 1934), p. 14.
French Personalities and Problems (London, 1945), p. 91.
For instance, Alexander Werth, France: 1940–1955 (London, 1956), p. 77.
Brogan, French Personalities, p. 95.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Osgood, S.M. (1970). Charles Maurras: The Beginnings of the Action Française. In: French Royalism Since 1870. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5071-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5071-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5073-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-5071-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive