Skip to main content

The Foundational Ontology Library ROMULUS

  • Conference paper
Model and Data Engineering (MEDI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8216))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A purpose of a foundational ontology is to solve interoperability issues among domain ontologies and they are used for ontology-driven conceptual data modelling. Multiple foundational ontologies have been developed in recent years, and most of them are available in several versions. This has re-introduced the interoperability problem, increased the need for a coordinated and structured comparison and elucidation of modelling decisions, and raised the requirement for software infrastructure to address this. We present here a basic step in that direction with the Repository of Ontologies for MULtiple USes, ROMULUS, which is the first online library of machine-processable, modularised, aligned, and logic-based merged foundational ontologies. In addition to the typical features of a model repository, it has a foundational ontology recommender covering features of six foundational ontologies, tailor-made modules for easier reuse, and a catalogue of interesting mappable and non-mappable elements among the BFO, GFO and DOLCE foundational ontologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proc. of FOIS 1998. IOS Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G.: In the defense of ontological foundations for conceptual modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 18(1), 9 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: Using the unified foundational ontology (UFO) as a foundation for general conceptual modeling languages. In: Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, pp. 175–196. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keet, C.M., Artale, A.: Representing and reasoning over a taxonomy of part-whole relations. Applied Ontology 3(1-2), 91–110 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keet, C.M.: Ontology-driven formal conceptual data modeling for biological data analysis. In: Biological Knowledge Discovery Handbook: Preprocessing, Mining and Postprocessing of Biological Data. Wiley (in press, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Ontology library. WonderWeb Deliverable D18 (ver. 1.0, 31-12-2003) (2003), http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org

  7. Herre, H.: General Formal Ontology (GFO): A foundational ontology for conceptual modelling. In: Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, pp. 297–345. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Niles, I., Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Proc. of FOIS 2001, Ogunquit, Maine, October 17-19, IOS Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mizoguchi, R.: YAMATO: yet another more advanced top-level ontology. In: Proc. of AOW 2010. CRPIT, pp. 1–16. ACS, Sydney (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baclawski, K., Schneider, T.: The open ontology repository initiative: Requirements and research challenges. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Collaborative Construction, Management and Linking of Structured Knowledge, Washington DC, USA, October 25. CEUR-WS, vol. 514 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khan, Z., Keet, C.M.: ONSET: Automated foundational ontology selection and explanation. In: ten Teije, A., Völker, J., Handschuh, S., Stuckenschmidt, H., d’Acquin, M., Nikolov, A., Aussenac-Gilles, N., Hernandez, N. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS, vol. 7603, pp. 237–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Guizzardi, G.: On the representation of quantities and their parts in conceptual modeling. In: Proc. of FOIS 2010, Toronto, May 11-14. IOS Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tudorache, T., Vendetti, J., Noy, N.F.: Web-Protege: A lightweight OWL ontology editor for the web. In: Proc. of OWLED 2008. CEUR-WS, vol. 432 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Third, A., Williams, S., Power, R.: OWL to English: A tool for generating organised easily-navigated hypertexts from ontologies. In: Proc. of ISWC 2011(Poster/Demo), Bonn, Germany, October 23-27. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hartmann: J., Sure, Y., Haase, P., Palma, R., del Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, M.: OMV - Ontology Metadata Vocabulary. In: Ontology Patterns for the Semantic Web (OPSW), Galway, Ireland (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, H., Brennan, R., O’Sullivan, D.: Using the OM2R meta-data model for ontology mapping reuse for the ontology alignment challenge - A case study. In: 7th Intl. Ws. on Ontology Matching (OM 2012). CEUR-WS, vol. 946 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. d’Aquin, M., Schlicht, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sabou, M.: Criteria and evaluation for ontology modularization techniques. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds.) Modular Ontologies. LNCS, vol. 5445, pp. 67–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Borgo, S.: Goals of modularity: A voice from the foundational viewpoint. In: Proc. of WoMO 2011. FAIA, vol. 230, pp. 1–6. IOS Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: Modular reuse of ontologies: Theory and practice. J. of Artificial Intelligence Research 31, 273–318 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Grau, B.C., Hendler, J.A.: Swoop: A web ontology editing browser. Journal of Web Semantics 4(2), 144–153 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Whetzel, P.L., et al.: Bioportal: enhanced functionality via new web services from the national center for biomedical ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucleic Acids Research 39(Web-Server-Issue), 541–545 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vale, D.C., et al.: The TONES ontology repository, http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/repository/browser (accessed on December 22, 2012)

  23. Gruninger, M.: COLORE: Common logic ontology repository (2009), http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR-Ontolog-Panel/ 2009-08-06Ontology-%?Repository-Research-Issues/Colore–MichaelGruninger20090806.pdf

  24. Lange, C., Mossakowski, T., Kutz, O., Galinski, C., Grüninger, M., Couto Vale, D.: The distributed ontology language (DOL): Use cases, syntax, and extensibility. In: Proc. of Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, TKE 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, B., et al.: Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol. 6(5), 46 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khan, Z.C., Keet, C.M. (2013). The Foundational Ontology Library ROMULUS. In: Cuzzocrea, A., Maabout, S. (eds) Model and Data Engineering. MEDI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8216. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41366-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41366-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41365-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41366-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics