Abstract
This paper intends to introduce and explore the broad conceptual background of relational justice according to the current state of the art. Relational Justice (RJ) is defined as the justice produced through cooperative behavior, agreement, negotiation, or dialogue among actors in a post-conflict situation. We found concepts stemming from at least thirty different fields, going from behavioral sciences (neurology, brain sciences, primatology, social psychology, etc.) to criminology, jurisprudence, and philosophy. One of these contributing fields is Artificial Intelligence (AI), which uses several techniques to grasp the practical knowledge of negotiators and mediators and builds tools to support both negotiation and mediation processes. However, contrary to the legal ontologies field, there are no developed ontologies of Relational Justice yet representing the conceptual richness of the domain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
McCold, P.: Primary Restorative Justice Practices. In: Morris, A., Maxwell, G. (eds.) Restorative Justice for Juveniles Conferencing, Mediation and Circles, pp. 41–58. Hart Publishing, Oxford-Portalnd (2001)
Mestitz, A., Ghetti, S. (eds.): Victim-offender Mediation with Youth Offenders in Europe. An overview and comparison of 15 countries. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)
Singer, J., Makie, K., Hardy, T, Massie, G. (Eds.): The EU Mediation Atlas: Practice and Regulation. CEDR (2004); Aertsen, I., Daems, T., Robert, L. (Eds.): Institutionalizing Restorative Justice, Devon. Willan Publishing (2006)
Dignan, J., Marsh, P.: Restorative Justice and Family Group Conferences in England: Current State and Future Prospects. In: Morris, A., Maxwell, G. (eds.) Restorative Justice for Juveniles Conferencing, Mediation and Circles, pp. 85–101. Hart Publishing, Oxford-Portland (2001)
Casanovas, P., Poblet, M.: Micro-foundations of restorative justice: a general framework. In: Mackay, R., Bošnjak, D.J., Pelikan, C., Stokkom, B., Wright, M. (eds.) Images of Restorative Justice Theory, p. 258. Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, Frankfurt am Main (2007)
de Bruijn, J., Ehring, M., Feier, C., Martín-Recuerda, F., Scharffe, F., Weiten, M.: Ontology Mediation, merging, and Aligning. In: Davies, J., Studer, R., Warren, P. (eds.) Semantic Web Technologies. Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, pp. 95–113. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2006)
Aschoff, F.R., Schmalhofer, F., van Elst, L.: Knowledge Mediation: A Procedure for the Cooperative Construction of Domain Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-2004 Workshop on Agent-mediated Knowledge Management (AMKM 2004), pp. 29–38 (2004)
Vrandečić, D., Pinto, S., Tempich, C., Sure, Y.: The DILIGENT knowledge process. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(5), 85–96 (2005)
Casanovas, P., Casellas, N., Tempich, C., Vrandečič, D., Benjamins, V.R.: OPJK and DILIGENT: ontology modelling in a distributed environment. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15, 171–186 (2007)
Bailin, S.C., Truszowski, W.: Ontology Negotiation: How Agents Can Really Get to Know Each Other. In: Truszkowski, W., Hinchey, M., Rouff, C.A. (eds.) WRAC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2564, pp. 320–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Fehr, E., Camerer, C.F.: Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. TRENDS in cognitive science 11(10), 227–419 (2007)
Bainbridge, W.S., Roco, M.C.: Manging Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations. Converging Technologies in Society. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Castelfranchi, C., Giardini, F., Marzo, M.: Relationships between rationality, human motives, and emotions. Mind & Society 5, 173–197 (2006)
Aureli, F., de Waal, F.M.B. (eds.): Natural Conflict Resolution. University of California Press (2000)
de Waal, F.M.B.: Primates – A Natural Heritage of Conflict Resolution. Science 289, 586–590 (2000)
Preston, S., de Waal, F.M.B.: Empathy: Its ultimate and proximal bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25, 1–72 (2002)
Damasio, A.R.: The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 351 1346, 1420–1513 (1996)
Singer, T., Frith, C.: The painful side of empathy. Nature Neuroscience 8(7), 845–846 (2005)
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., Gätcher, S.: Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation and the Enforcement of Social Norms. Human Nature 13, 1–25 (2002)
Murray, R.J.: Forgiveness as a Therapeutic Option. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families 10(3), 315–321 (2002)
McCullough, M.E., Rachal, K.C., Worthington Jr., E., Brown, S.W., Hight, T.L.: Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships: II, Theoretical Elaboration and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(6), 1586–1603 (1997)
Ekman, P.: Emotions Revealed. Understanding Faces and Feelings. Widenfield & Nicholson, London (2003)
Nerlich, B., Clarke, D.D.: Semantic fields and frames: Historical explorations of the interface between language, action, and cognition. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 125–150 (2000)
Levinson, S.: Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Foley, W.A.: Anthropological Linguistics. An Introduction. Blackwell Publ., Oxford (1997)
Saville-Troike, M.: The Ethnography of Communication. An Introduction. Blackwell Publ., Oxford (2003)
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., Kasper, G.: Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1989)
Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., the PDP Research Group: Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. vol. 1. Foundations. vol. 2. Psychological and Biological Models. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)
Clancey, W.J., Sachs, P., Sierhus, M., Hoof, R.V.: Brahms: simulating practice for work systems design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 49, 831–865 (1998)
Deutschmann, M.: Apologising in British English, Doctoral Dissertation. Skrifter från moderna språk 10. Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå Universitet (2003)
Nader, L. (ed.): Law in Culture and Society. Aldine Publ., Chicago (1969)
Lederach, P.: Building Peace. Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington (1997)
Theidon, K.: Justice in Transition. The Micro-politics of Reconciliation in Postwar Peru, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(3), 433–457 (2006)
Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Garfinkel, M.R., Skarpedas, S.: Economics of Conflict: An Overview. University of California (Irvine) (2006), http://ideas.repec.org/p/irv/wpaper/050623.html
Yiu, K.T.W., Cheng, C.O.: A Study of Construction Mediator Tactics. Part II: The Contiongent Use of Tactics, Building and Environment 42(I2), 752–761 (2007)
Chebat, J.C., Slusarczyk, W.: How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations. Journal of Business Research 58, 664–673 (2005)
Aquino, K., Tripp, T., Bies, R.J.: Getting Even or Moving On? Power, procedural Justice, and Types of Offenses as Predictors of Revenge, Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Avoid-ance in Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(3), 653–668 (2006)
Simon, H.A.: Making Management Decisions:The Role of Intuition and Emotion, Academy of Management Executive, February, pp. 57–64 (1987)
Kahnemann, Daniel: Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. The American Economic Review 5, 1449–1475 (2003)
Braithwaite, J.: Meta-regulation for Access to Justice: Presentation to General Aspects of Law (GALA). Seminar series, University of California, Berkeley, November 13 (2003), http://www.law.berkeley.edu/centers/kadish/gala03/Braithwaite%20Kent.pdf
Jameson, J.K., Bodtker, A.M., Jone, T.: Like Talking in a Brick Wall: Implications of Emotion Metaphors for Mediation Practice. Negotiation Journal 22(2), 199–207 (2006)
Cobb, S., Rifkin, J.: Practice and Paradox: Deconstructing neutrality in Mediation. Law and Social Inquiry 16(1), 36–62 (1991)
Fisher, R., Ury, W.: Getting to Yes. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving. Houghton Mifflin Company (1981)
Fisher, R., Shapiro, D.: Beyond Reason. Using Emotions as You Negotiate. Random House Business Books (2006)
Hoffman, D.: Paradoxes of Mediation, American Association Dispute Resolution Magazine, Fall/Winter (2002) (2005), http://bostonlawcollaborative.com/documents/2005-07-paradoxes-of-mediation.pdf
Olson, S.M., Dzur, A.W.: Revisiting Informal Justice: Restorative Justice and Democratic Professionalism. Law & Society Review 38(1), 139–176 (2004)
Uijjttenbroek, E.M.: The influence of motives and styles in mediation online dispute resolution. In: Lodder, A., Rule, C., Zeleznikow, J. (eds.) Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on ODR, Palo Alto, June 8, pp. 31–35 (2007)
Raines, S.S.: Can Online Mediation Be Transformative? Tales From the Front. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 22(4), 437–451 (2005)
De Dreu, C.K.W., Carnevale, P.J.: Disparate Methods and Common Findings in the Study of Negotiation. International negotiation 10, 193–203 (2005)
Ben-Ze’ev, A.: Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 451–467 (2003)
Walton, D., Lodder, A.: What Role can Rational Argument Play in ADR and Online Dispute Resolution. In: Zeleznikow, J., Lodder, A. (eds.) Second International ODR Workshop. Wolf Legal Publishers, Tilburg (2005)
Putnam, L.: Transformations and Critical Moments in Negotiations. Negotiation Journal 20(2), 275–295 (2004)
Lodder, A.R., Zeleznikow, J.: Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 10, 237–288 (2005)
Cohen, R.: Negotiating Across Cultures, 2nd edn. Institute for Peace, Washington (1997)
Aakhus, M.: Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation. Argumentation 17, 265–290 (2003)
Gordon, T., Märker, O.: Mediation Systems, Online mediation. In: Märker, O., Trénel (eds.) Neue Medien in Der Konfliktvermittung-Mit Bespielen Aus Politik Und Wirtschaft, Sigma edn., Berlin, pp. 61–84 (2002); Thiessen, E., Zeleznikow, J.: Technical Aspects of Online Dispute Resolution—Challenges and Opportunities, http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/thiessen_zeleznikow.htm
Katsh, E.: Online Dispute Resolution: Some Implications for the Emergence of Law in Cyberspace. International Review of Law Computers & Technology 21(2), 97–107 (2007)
Gordon, T., Märker, O.: Mediation Systems, Online mediation. In: Märker, O., Trénel (eds.) Neue Medien in Der Konfliktvermittung-Mit Bespielen Aus Politik Und Wirtschaft, Sigma edn., Berlin, pp. 61–84 (2002); Thiessen, E., Zeleznikow, J.: Technical Aspects of Online Dispute Resolution—Challenges and Opportunities, http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/thiessen_zeleznikow.htm
Walton, D., Godden, D.M.: Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution. AI and Law 13, 273–295 (2005)
Tamma, V., Phelps, S., Dickinson, I., Wooldridge, M.: Ontologies for supporting negotiation in e-commerce. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18, 223–236 (2005)
Ermolayev, V., Keberle, N., Tolok, V.: OIL Ontologies for Collaborative Task Performance in Coalitions of Self-Interested Actors. In: Arisawa, H., Kambayashi, Y., Kumar, V., Mayr, H.C., Hunt, I. (eds.) ER Workshops 2001. LNCS, vol. 2465, pp. 390–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Anumba, C.J., Ren, Z., Thorpe, A., Ugwu, O.O., Newnham, L.: Negotiation within a multiagent system for the collaborative design of light industrial buildings. Advances in Engineering Software 34, 389–401 (2003)
Bailin, S.C., Truszkowski, W.: Ontology Negotiation Between Intelligent Information Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 17(1), 7–19 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Casanovas, P., Poblet, M. (2008). Concepts and Fields of Relational Justice. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds) Computable Models of the Law. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4884. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85568-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85569-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)