Skip to main content

On Words and Discourse: From Quantitative to Qualitative

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resources and Applied Methods in International Relations

Abstract

This chapter introduces two types of methods of textual analysis by dealing with an empirical case (the state of the union discourses of the Bush Jr. and Obama administrations). The first part demonstrates the interest of using statistical textual analysis to explore voluminous corpus of texts, test assumptions, identify major lexical worlds and increase methodological rigor of textual data analysis. The second set of methods comes from political theory, with a focus on specific textual dimensions: classical or Straussian approach (the exegesis of texts), neo-Marxism (the linguistic structure of hegemony), Cambridge school or Skinnerian perspective (the usage of linguistic conventions in conceptual and historical contexts). By linking these two kinds of methods, the chapter intends to show the advantages of cross-fertilization between quantitative and qualitative tools for understanding political discourses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is surprising to see that certain political analysts do not take this major aspect into consideration. On this point, see the introduction to the collective work directed by Johanna Siméant, Guide de l’enquête globale en sciences sociales (Paris, CNRS Éditions, 2015), pp. 5–11.

  2. 2.

    We deliberately chose these two contrasting methodological matrices to suggest possible links and an exchange between varying perspectives.

  3. 3.

    On the notion of assemblage, see Michele Acuto and Simon Curtis (eds), Reassembling International Theory. Assemblage Thinking and International Relations (London: Palgrave, 2013).

  4. 4.

    Max Reinert , “Mondes lexicaux stabilisés et analyse statistique de discours,” Actes des neuvièmes journées internationales d’analyse statistique de données textuelles JADT, Lyon, France, 2008.

  5. 5.

    IRaMuTeQ is an open-source software based on Reinert’s method and developed by Pierre Ratinaud. The software and instruction manual can be downloaded at: www.iramuteq.org/

  6. 6.

    Laurent Beauguitte, France Guérin-Pace and Yann Richard, “L’UE et ses voisinages: acteurs et espaces d’un discours,” paper presented at the Fronts et frontières des sciences du territoire colloquium, Paris, March 27–28, 2014.

  7. 7.

    For example, Cécile Alduy and Stéphane Wahnich, Marine Le Pen prise aux mots. Décryptage du nouveau discours frontiste (Paris, Seuil, 2015).

  8. 8.

    The texts must be written in the same language, and the researcher must have mastered it and be in a position to detect linguistic subtleties.

  9. 9.

    For example, declensions of a verb, and the singular and plural of a noun are classified under the same lexical entry (a lemma).

  10. 10.

    A concordancer is a tool proposed by software that puts words in their enunciative context.

  11. 11.

    Leo Strauss , What is Political Philosophy And Other Stories? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959), p. 10. On the context, see Leo Strauss, La Persécution et l’art d’écrire (Paris: Éditions de l’éclat, 2003 [1952]).

  12. 12.

    Corinne Pelluchon, “Leo Strauss et George Bush,” Le Banquet, 19–20, December-January 2004, pp. 238–292. For a point of debate, see Anne Norton, Leo Strauss et la politique de l’empire américain (Paris: Denoël, 2006 [2004]). Robert Howse, Leo Strauss. Man of Peace (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  13. 13.

    Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (New York: International Publishers, 1970), pp. 20–21.

  14. 14.

    Charles Beard, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (New York (N. Y.), Macmillan, 1913).

  15. 15.

    See in particular his study of Lorenzetti’s fresco (see Chap. 4 of this book).

  16. 16.

    Quentin Skinner , Visions of Politics, 1, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 86–87.

  17. 17.

    Claude Gauthier, “Texte, contexte et intention illocutoire de l’auteur. Les enjeux du programme méthodologique de Quentin Skinner,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2(42), (2004): 175–192.

  18. 18.

    Another orientation consists in identifying a great historical fresco. See R. Koselleck, “Einleitung,” in O. Brunner, W. Conze and R. Koselleck (eds), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland 1, at XIV.

  19. 19.

    For an example, see Frédéric Ramel, “Perpetual Peace and the Idea of “Concert” in Eighteenth-Century Thought,” in Damien Mahiet, Mark Ferraguto and Rebekah Ahrendt (eds), Music and Diplomacy from the Early Modern Era to the Present (New York (N. Y.): Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 125–146.

Bibliography

  • Alduy, Cécile, and Wahnich Stéphane. 2015. Marine Le Pen prise aux mots. Décryptage du nouveau discours frontiste. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauguitte, Laurent, France Guérin-Pace, and Yann Richard. 2014. . L’UE et ses voisinages: acteurs et espaces d’un discours. Communication at the Conference “Fronts et frontières des sciences du territoire,” Paris, 27–28 March 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnafous, Simone, and Maurice Tournier. 1995. Analyse du discours, lexicométrie, communication et politique. Langages 29 (117): 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W., and Timothy J. Sinclair. 1996. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, John E. 1996. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen, ed. 2011. Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel-Jorand, M.C., M. Reinert, M. Bonnon, and P. Therme. 1995. Discourse Analysis and Psychological Adaptation to High Altitude Hypoxia. Stress and Health 11 (1): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2460110105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, Max. 2008. Mondes lexicaux stabilisés et analyse statistique de discours. Actes des neuvièmes journées internationales d’analyse statistique de données textuelle JADT, Lyon, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 2014. Belief, Truth and Interpretation. Conference, University Bochum, Ruhr, 18. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJYsTJt8vxg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baillat, A., Emprin, F., Ramel, F. (2018). On Words and Discourse: From Quantitative to Qualitative. In: Devin, G. (eds) Resources and Applied Methods in International Relations. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61979-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics