Regular ArticleHox gene duplication in fish☆
References (36)
- et al.
Hox genes and chordate evolution
Dev Biol
(1996) - et al.
Hox gene complexity in Medaka fish may be similar to that in pufferfish rather than zebrafish
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(1999) - et al.
Eukaryote genome duplication—where's the evidence?
Curr Opin Genet Dev
(1998) Evolution by Gene Duplication.
(1970)- et al.
Duplication of large genomic regions during the evolution of vertebrate homeobox genes
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
(1989) Evolution of the vertebrate Hox homeobox genes
BioEssays
(1992)- et al.
Gene duplications and origins of vertebrate development
Development
(1994) - et al.
Comparable rates of gene loss and functional divergence after genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution
Genetics
(1997) - et al.
Phylogenetic reconstruction of vertebrate Hox cluster duplications
Mol Biol Evol
(1997) - et al.
Archetypal organization of the amphioxus Hox gene cluster
Nature
(1994)
Fishes of the World
Patterns and processes of vertebrate evolution,
Expansion of the Hox gene family and the evolution of chordates
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
PCR-survey of Hox-genes of the zebrafish: new sequence information and evolutionary implications
J Exp Zool
Evidence for four Hox clusters in the killifish Fundulus heteroclitus (Teleostei)
Mol Phylogenet Evol
Evolution of the vertebrate genome: clues from homeobox genes,
Organization of the Fugu rubripes Hox clusters: evidence for continuing evolution of vertebrate Hox complexes
Nat Genet
Cited by (36)
Looking beyond the genes: The interplay between signaling pathways and mechanics in the shaping and diversification of epithelial tissues
2016, Current Topics in Developmental BiologyCitation Excerpt :In that respect duplications are not fundamentally different from the process of cumulative mutations and they do not fully and convincingly explain major innovations. In fact, earlier hypotheses that gene duplication events correlated with apparent patterns of bursts in morphological complexity of vertebrates (Ruddle et al., 1994; Sidow, 1996; Stellwag, 1999) are not tenable in the light of the fossil record: the corresponding, apparent gaps between the living branches of the vertebrate tree are filled up by series of extinct but intermediate taxa (Donoghue & Purnell, 2005). In the next section, we focus more specifically on the evolution of organs derived from epithelial tissues.
Parasite histories and novel phylogenetic tools: Alternative approaches to inferring parasite evolution from molecular markers
2006, International Journal for ParasitologyGenome duplication, extinction and vertebrate evolution
2005, Trends in Ecology and EvolutionEvidence for independent Hox gene duplications in the hagfish lineage: A PCR-based gene inventory of Eptatretus stoutii
2004, Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionCitation Excerpt :All gnathostomes investigated so far with the exception of higher teleosts have four Hox clusters that are homologous and most likely derived by duplication from the single amphioxus Hox cluster (Holland and Garcia-Fernandez, 1996; Koh et al., 2003; Prohaska et al., 2004b). The higher teleosts underwent an additional duplication of the four gnathostome clusters (Amores et al., 1998, 2004; Chiu et al., 2002; Málaga-Trillo and Meyer, 2001; Prohaska et al., 2004a; Stellwag, 1999). Lampreys have three to four clusters that have no clear homology to either individual or pairs of gnathostome clusters (Force et al., 2002; Fried et al., 2003; Irvine et al., 2002; Pendleton et al., 1993; Sharman and Holland, 1998).