Regular Article
Taking Advice: Accepting Help, Improving Judgment, and Sharing Responsibility,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2697Get rights and content

Abstract

Why do people take advice? To find out, we provided a low, medium, or high level of training on a task in which judgments varied in importance. Then, in a test session, we eliminated feedback but made advice available. Different features of our results suggest that there are three distinct reasons for taking advice. First, even experienced judges took some advice from novices: people appear reluctant to reject completely the help offered to them. Second, all judges took more advice from advisors more experienced than themselves, and the amount that they took was related to the difference in level of experience: people appeared to be trying to use advice to improve their judgments. Third, experience enabled people to distinguish judgments on the basis of their importance. Experienced judges took about twice as much advice for the most important judgments: they appeared to be sharing responsibility when the risk associated with error was high. Thus, we model advice-taking in terms of three components: accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility.

References (49)

  • R.M Hogarth et al.

    Order effects in belief updating: The Belief Adjustment Model

    Cognitive Psychology

    (1992)
  • R.E Petty et al.

    The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion

    Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • N Schmitt et al.

    Types of task information in multiple-cue probability learning

    Organizational Behavior and Human Performance

    (1977)
  • J.A Sniezek et al.

    Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making

    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    (1995)
  • O Svenson

    Are we all less risky and more skilful than our fellow drivers are?

    Acta Psychologica

    (1981)
  • D Trafimow et al.

    Perceived expertise and its effects on confidence

    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    (1994)
  • W Wood et al.

    Access to attitude relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1985)
  • J.A Adams et al.

    Feedback and practice as variables in error detection and correction

    Journal of Motor Behavior

    (1973)
  • D.C Berry et al.

    On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1984)
  • M.H Birnbaum et al.

    Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise and the judge's point of view

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1979)
  • M.H Birnbaum et al.

    Combining information from sources that vary in credibility

    Memory and Cognition

    (1976)
  • G.E.P Box et al.

    An analysis of transformations

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B

    (1964)
  • M Bulmer

    The Royal Commission and departmental committee in the British policy-making process

    Advising West European governments: Inquires, expertise and public policy

    (1993)
  • R Carbone et al.

    Evaluation of extrapolative forecasting methods: Results of a survey of academicians and practitioners

    Journal of Forecasting

    (1982)
  • Cited by (401)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Parts of this paper were presented at the Seventh Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Lisbon, 1994, and at the Sixteenth International Symposium on Forecasting, Istanbul, 1996. The research was in part funded by Economic and Social Research Council Grant R000236827.

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to N. Harvey, Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Fax: +44 171 436 4276. E-mail: [email protected].

    ☆☆

    B. G. PetersA. Barker, Eds.

    View full text