Regular Article
Molecular Phylogenies of Plants and Frankia Support Multiple Origins of Actinorhizal Symbioses

https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1999.0692Get rights and content

Abstract

Molecular phylogenetic trees were reconstructed from nucleotide sequences of nifH and 16S rDNA for Frankia and of rbcL for actinorhizal plants. Comparison of Frankia phylogenetic trees reconstructed using nifH and 16S rDNA sequences indicated that subgroupings of both trees correspond with each other in terms of plant origins of Frankia strains. The results suggested that 16S rDNAs can be utilized for coevolution analysis of actinorhizal symbioses. Frankia and plant phylogenetic trees reconstructed using 16S rDNA and rbcL sequences were compared. The comparison by tree matching and likelihood ratio tests indicated that although branching orders of both trees do not strictly correspond with each other, subgroupings of Frankia and their host plants correspond with each other in terms of symbiotic partnership. Estimated divergence times among Frankia and plant clades indicated that Frankia clades diverged more recently than plant clades. Taken together, actinorhizal symbioses originated more than three times after the four plant clades diverged.

References (39)

  • R.D.M. Page

    Parallel phylogenies: Reconstructing the history of host–parasite assemblages

    Cladistics

    (1994)
  • J.P. Young et al.

    The evolution of specificity in the legume–rhizobium symbiosis

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (1989)
  • V.A. Albert et al.

    Functional constraints and rbcL evidence for land plant phylogeny

    Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.

    (1994)
  • D.D. Baker

    Relationships among pure cultured strains of Frankia based on host-specificity

    Physiol. Plant.

    (1987)
  • D.R. Benson et al.

    Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from Frankia strains in root nodules of Ceanothus griseus, Coriaria arborea, Coriaria plumosa, Discaria toumatou, and Purshia tridentata

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1996)
  • J. Bousquet et al.

    The genetics of actinorhizal Betulaceae

  • J. Felsenstein

    Phylogenies from molecular sequences: Inference and reliability

    Annu. Rev. Genet.

    (1988)
  • M.S. Hafner et al.

    Cospeciation in host–parasite assemblages: Comparative analysis of rates of evolution and timing of cospeciation

    Syst. Zool.

    (1990)
  • M.S. Hafner et al.

    Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites

    Science

    (1994)
  • M.S. Hafner et al.

    Molecular phylogenies and host–parasite cospeciation: Gophers and lice as a model system

    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B

    (1995)
  • E.F. Harding

    The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation

    Adv. Appl. Prob.

    (1971)
  • J.P. Huelsenbeck et al.

    Statistical tests of host–parasite cospeciation

    Evolution

    (1997)
  • J.P. Huelsenbeck et al.

    Phylogenetic methods come of age: Testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context

    Science

    (1997)
  • S.-C. Jeong et al.

    Molecular phylogeny of the genus Ceanothus using ndhF and rbcL sequences

    Theor. Appl. Genet.

    (1997)
  • M. Kimura

    A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences

    J. Mol. Evol.

    (1980)
  • M. Lalonde et al.

    Advances in the taxonomy of Frankia: Recognition of species alni and eleagni and novel subspecies pommerii and vandijkii

  • W.-H. Li et al.

    Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution

    (1991)
  • L. Maggia et al.

    Molecular phylogeny of the actinorhizal Hamamelidae and relationship with host promiscuity towards Frankia

    Mol. Ecol.

    (1994)
  • N.A. Moran et al.

    A molecular clock in endosymbiotic bacteria is calibrated using the insect hosts

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (44)

    • A Resurrected Scenario: Single Gain and Massive Loss of Nitrogen-Fixing Nodulation

      2019, Trends in Plant Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The first hypothesis has been almost universally dismissed, whereas the latter is widely accepted on the basis of two main arguments [14–24]. First, it comprises scenarios that require fewer evolutionary events and that are supported by phylogenetic ancestral state reconstruction studies [14–16,20,22]. Second, there is considerable variation among nodulating lineages in the type of microsymbiont, nodule ontogeny, and physiology [25–28].

    • Robust Frankia phylogeny, species delineation and intraspecies diversity based on Multi-Locus Sequence Analysis (MLSA) and Single-Locus Strain Typing (SLST) adapted to a large sample size

      2018, Systematic and Applied Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This group is likely to be the most ancient branching in Frankia’s evolutionary history and could have diverged 263–285 Myr bp, long before actinorhizal plants appearance in the fossil records [25] dated between 70 Myr [115] and 100 Myr [127]. The broad host range – encompassing four phylogenetically distant families [57,116] – of Cluster 2 strains could be a remnant of a symbiotic ancestor common to present-day lineages [117]. On the opposite, Clusters 1 and 3 comprise the most recently evolved groups of strains.

    • Typing of nitrogen-fixing Frankia strains by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry

      2011, Systematic and Applied Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The first sub-group represents strains of the Alnus host infection group, including Casuarina-infective strains, the second sub-group represents yet uncultured endophytes in nodules of Dryas, Coriaria, and Datisca species, the third sub-group represents strains of the Elaeagnus host infection group and the last sub-group represents atypical, non-nitrogen-fixing strains [53]. While atypical, non-nitrogen fixing isolates are generally neglected in phylogenetic studies on the genus Frankia, the first three subgroups, also referred to as clusters 1–3 [12], have widely been confirmed by additional sequence analyses of 16S rRNA gene fragments [11,13,14] or of recA [40], glnA, glnII [12,16] or nifH gene fragments [15,33,45,61], suggesting genotypic classification reflecting physiological differences, i.e., phenotypic traits within the genus Frankia. The differentiation into these three DNA-sequence type groups is further confirmed by DNA–DNA relatedness of pure cultures that differentiate Frankia strains from different host infection groups.

    • Plant Symbioses with Frankia and Cyanobacteria

      2007, Biology of the Nitrogen Cycle
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text